Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کنکور زبان | رضایی

Channel

کنکور زبان | رضایی

@ZabanPlus_ir

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,772subscribers

-312 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001569137904
TypeChannel
Username@ZabanPlus_ir
Description👨‍🏫در روبیکا: Rubika.ir/RezaeeAc @RezaeeAc Rezaeiac.ir 💣 مشاوره و تدریس زبان تخصصی کنکور 💣 📌رزرو مشاوره و اطلاع از دوره‌ها: 💣 @Rezaeeac_support ☄️ تا کنکور و بعد کنکور در کنارتون هستیم☄️
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZabanPlus_ir

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RezaeeAc/227 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC@ZabanPlus_ir/4685 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC1.0076 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RezaeeAc7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0040 minutes@RezaeeAc (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 66 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @RezaeeAc. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,7727,1666,9697 August 2026 — 7,084 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,084 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,094 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,122 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,140 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,166 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,150 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,016 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,998 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,979 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,965 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,947 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,929 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,913 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,872 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,856 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,853 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,843 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,820 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,806 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,794 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,798 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,793 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,788 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,774 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,772 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,713–7,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:596,772-2
6 Nov 2026, 15:106,774-14
3 Nov 2026, 06:316,788-5
30 Oct 2026, 23:446,793-5
28 Oct 2026, 00:146,798+4
24 Oct 2026, 17:276,794-12
21 Oct 2026, 22:496,806-14
18 Oct 2026, 22:386,820-23
15 Oct 2026, 22:186,843-10
12 Oct 2026, 15:406,853-3
5 Oct 2026, 16:016,856-16
28 Sept 2026, 02:016,872-41
18 Sept 2026, 18:416,913-16
14 Sept 2026, 13:406,929-18
6 Sept 2026, 06:206,947-18
1 Sept 2026, 14:146,965-14
29 Aug 2026, 21:046,979-19
27 Aug 2026, 02:276,998-18
24 Aug 2026, 07:487,016-134
20 Aug 2026, 15:347,150first reading

Engagement

123 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 6,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
616
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 123 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held123 (23 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total25,271
Reactions total210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,350
Videos
≈104
Links
≈897

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
20m 07s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,109 reactions across 99 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤72265.1%
🔥1109.92%
👍817.30%
🎉322.89%
😍302.71%
💔252.25%
🍓221.98%
👀191.71%
🥰151.35%
🆒131.17%
🤩121.08%
❤‍🔥80.721%
💯70.631%
💘40.361%
🙈40.361%
🤷‍♀30.271%
🤝10.09%
🫡10.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

گرامر با جزوه شما ۱۰۰ میشه 💆🏻‍♀🎀

🤩1

10 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC313 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcVoice message

🙂کیفیت تست کتاب‌های آبی قلمچی، مبتکران، سیگنال ۱۰۰، خیلی سبز و‌.. . برای چه کسی مناسبه و برای کی مناسب نیست؟ . آیا می‌شه با تکیه به یکی از این منابع از سطح پایین رتبه برتر شد؟ #جواب_با_ما ❕➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖❕ کـنکـور زبــان • آکـادمی رضـایـی 🎓 📎 RezaeiAc.ir • @RezaeeAc

❤6

10 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC298 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcVoice message

🙂منابع وکب رو به چه ترتیبی باید خوند؟ #جواب_با_ما ❕➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖❕ کـنکـور زبــان • آکـادمی رضـایـی 🎓 📎 RezaeiAc.ir • @RezaeeAc

10 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC420 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

یک ارزیابی از کتاب های بازاری مبتکران، خیلی سبز، سیگنال ۱۰۰، کتاب آبی و‌‌... داشته باشیم

👍11🤷‍♀1

10 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC315 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAc

یه سوال: برای شروع یادگیری رانندگی، از 🚚 شروع می‌کنید؟ 🚌 یا پراید؟

10 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC319 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcPhoto

⁉️ برای تقویت دامنه لغت از GRE شروع کنیم یا ۵۰۴؟ ❕➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖❕ کـنکـور زبــان • آکـادمی رضـایـی 🎓 📎 RezaeiAc.ir • @RezaeeAc

10 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC304 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcPoll

The threat of war has hung over the region like the ............... for nearly a decade. 1100 | Week 2 | Day 5 Rezaee

  1. pyrrhic victory13%
  2. wet blanket27%
  3. sword of Damocles38%
  4. flash in the pan22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC392 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAc

بلهههههه استادددد درست میبینید 🤍 رئال مادرید بخشی از خاطرات من از هفت‌ سالگیه تا امروز از همون روزهایی که شاید معنای واقعی پیرهن سفیدو نمیدونستم ولی یادش گرفتم جنگیدن تا آخرین ثانیه باور داشتن وقتی همه‌ چی از دست‌ رفته به نظر میرسه و ساختن غیرممکن‌ هاااا قطعا رونالدو بیش از هر کسی این فلسفه رو برا من معنا کرده کسی که نشون داد استعداد بدون انضباط و رویا بدون تلاش به جایی نمیرسه اما درباره برگه‌ های روی دیوار از نظر…

❤‍🔥8🤩2❤1🫡1

9 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC342 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAc

شمام دوست دارید بدونید رئال اونجا چی‌کار می‌کنه؟ یا اون برگه‌های رو دیوار چه کارایی داره؟

👍6

9 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC369 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcPhoto

تصویر صبح خیلی خیلی زود؟ یا شب خیلی خیلی دیر؟

❤7

9 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC359 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAcPhoto

《یه کنکوریه ۴۰۷ دیوونه که روز شمار کنکور هم دارههه》 . چه عکس خیلی جذابی😍، از میز مطالعه اون پی دی افی که رو لپتاپ بازه، بانک تست فوکس یکمونه😁

❤8

9 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC311 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @RezaeeAc

نشانی از رئال مادرید🥇؟ درست می‌بینم؟ نارسان لطفا داستان اون برگه‌های رو دیوار رو هم برامون بگو

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @ZabanPlus_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz151 voters

The threat of war has hung over the region like the ............... for nearly a decade. 1100 | Week 2 | Day 5 Rezaee

  1. pyrrhic victory13%
  2. wet blanket27%
  3. sword of Damocles38%
  4. flash in the pan22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz224 voters

The garden in which stands my humble .................. is separated only by a lame from Rosings Park. 1100:Week 1 - Day 2 | R. Rezaee

  1. automaton17%
  2. prognostication21%
  3. abode28%
  4. habitat33%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کنکور منحصرا زبان | مشاور زبان
@Moshaverezaban · 24,376
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 September 2026
زبان انگلیسی با ارشنیا نیا
@RezaArashniaOfficial · 19,724
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 September 2026
سایت کنکور | Konkur.in
@konkur_in · 77,687
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
فرهنگ یارم ● فرهنگیان
@FarhangYaram · 34,032
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
زبان دهم تا کنکور (ویژن)
@visionch · 24,715
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
مشاوره کنکور | فرهنگ‌‌ یار
@farhangyargroup · 67,499
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
فرهنگیان نیوز | آموزش و پرورش🎯
@CfuNewz · 20,599
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 September 2026
شیمی و فیزیک| دکتر میلاد قادری
@drmiladghadery · 21,882
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
کتابخانه فرهنگیان
@CFUketab · 38,395
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کنکور زبان | رضایی” (@ZabanPlus_ir), 6,772 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZabanPlus_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.