Channel
@ZXZH12
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
218subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003042238348 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZXZH12 |
| Description | 珠海大群 @xc14555 珠海公开榜 @hxjc01 全国联盟总频道- @xc881122 上榜广告业务合作 @xiuche4421x_bot |
| Created | 8 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZXZH12 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 218 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 218 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (8 November 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 194 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出击SOP流程图，请按流程操作！ 【验证留名】：珠海陈冠希 【验证时间】：7.20 【老师艺名】：#果果 【所在位置】：#香洲 【上课学费】：600p 【身高身材】：160左右，身材也棒 【颜值相似】：人照一致 【凶器罩杯】：C 【服务内容】：XCZ…… 【服务详情】:一眼相中榜上的果果老师，还是个嫩妹，这得赶紧约起，立即约时间，开车出发，到了地方果果妹妹指导上楼，一见真人远比照片好看，妹妹现实里的颜值更惊艳，进门就拿水。闲聊了一会，给了课费。然后一同来到浴室洗澡，妹妹帮洗，这个时候可以看见妹妹的身材，身形纤巧瘦弱，身段曲线丰盈玲珑，稚气的容貌搭配错落有致的体态，甜美的少女韵味浑然天成。到了床上，我先躺下，妹妹舔胸开始，我双手开始游走，口完以后，我让妹妹躺下，妹妹可以kiss，管她呢，先亲亲。然后吃奶玩奶，妹妹有些敏感。然后69，妹妹反应大了起来，开始挣扎，一顿舔，妹妹流水潺潺。最后妹妹身体颤抖，我心满意足。开始正戏，戴上…
【验证留名】：lei yu 【验证时间】：5.8 【妹子艺名】：#暖 【所在位置】：#坦洲 【 安 全 性 】：商圈公寓 【上课学费】：600P 【身高身材】：1.65米 85斤左右 【颜值相似】：8.5成 【凶器罩杯】：B 【服务内容】：洗吹做 【服务详情】：地点是公寓，遥控上楼后，真人好看，和照片比较一致，身材苗条。交完学费，一起洗浴，洗干净擦干身子后，开始服务，看得出来是刚做没多久，服务不算熟练但该做的都会询问你需不需要做，会返食 【机车行为】：无 【优点缺点】：无 优点： 1. 年轻嫩妹 2. 女友feel ，很温柔，說話小聲 3. 身材瘦小，皮肤白，摸起来很滑 缺点：无 【推荐程度】：5星 老师链接：https://t.me/hxjc01/1035 修车交流群： https://t.me/xc14555 提交报告请附截图 @xiuche4421x_bot
❤2
珠海报告榜 pinned «出击SOP流程图，请按流程操作！ 【验证留名】： 【验证时间】： 【老师艺名】： 【所在位置】： 【上课学费】： 【身高身材】： 【颜值相似】： 【凶器罩杯】： 【服务内容】： 【服务详情】：#详细描述 【机车行为】： 【优点缺点】： 【推荐程度】：#最高5星 老师链接🔗: 修车交流群： https://t.me/xc14555 提交报告请附截图 @xiuche4421x_bot»
出击SOP流程图，请按流程操作！ 【验证留名】： 【验证时间】： 【老师艺名】： 【所在位置】： 【上课学费】： 【身高身材】： 【颜值相似】： 【凶器罩杯】： 【服务内容】： 【服务详情】：#详细描述 【机车行为】： 【优点缺点】： 【推荐程度】：#最高5星 老师链接🔗: 修车交流群： https://t.me/xc14555 提交报告请附截图 @xiuche4421x_bot
❤3
出击SOP流程图，请按流程操作！ 【验证留名】： 【验证时间】： 【老师艺名】： 【所在位置】： 【上课学费】： 【身高身材】： 【颜值相似】： 【凶器罩杯】： 【服务内容】： 【服务详情】：#详细描述 【机车行为】： 【优点缺点】： 【推荐程度】：#最高5星 老师链接🔗: 修车交流群： https://t.me/xc14555 提交报告请附截图 @xiuche4421x_bot
😈1
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ZXZH12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 986,105 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“珠海报告榜” (@ZXZH12), 218 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZXZH12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.