интерактив от канала Śerp. Задача: ваши мью под этим постом пишут мнение о вас и вашем канале, скрытым сообщением. Приняла от: @Lia_diaryy Передаю: Всем желающим.

Channel
Выходной. | Леди Мафия.
@ZWJR7_YK8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
113subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004318424680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZWJR7_YK8 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZWJR7_YK8 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 113 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 104 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 104 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 108.6%
- avg views ÷ 113 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 123
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 19.7%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,331 |
| Reactions total | 278 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
278 reactions across 8 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429369421317586929 | 58 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5422737811423918818 | 35 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5397896618232019713 | 29 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5422738288165286717 | 23 | 8.27% | |
| custom 5220083559133378061 | 15 | 5.40% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 5.40% | |
| custom 5220179225234928550 | 14 | 5.04% | |
| custom 5280547666344833864 | 14 | 5.04% | |
| custom 5274166865361397249 | 11 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5429422519998252699 | 11 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5462971192447103480 | 11 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5314683559607300694 | 10 | 3.60% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5426844590432882384 | 6 | 2.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.80% | |
| custom 5314281013797485338 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5335038878501855657 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5429574201063279918 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5429570395722253001 | 2 | 0.719% | |
| custom 5199638380933046705 | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.36% |
Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZWJR7_YK8. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Так ладно, не будем о грустном. Пойду разберусь с некоторыми делами и потом приду к вам. Не скучайте тут.
Рк/рп мнение по желанию. (Если взаимно хотите то пишите). + Набор. One the vzrp channel.
Sticker, posted without a caption
С̸Т̸О̸П̸ И̸Г̸Р̸А̸ И̸ Б̸У̸Д̸Ь̸ Ч̸Т̸О̸ Б̸У̸Д̸Е̸Т̸, П̸О̸Б̸Е̸Д̸И̸Т̸Е̸Л̸Е̸Й̸ Н̸Е̸ С̸У̸Д̸Я̸Т̸.
custom 527416686536139724911custom 542942251999825269911custom 546297119244710348011custom 54268445904328823846custom 53142810137974853383❤🔥2custom 51996383809330467051custom 54270678943725339891
Sticker, posted without a caption
100. ✅ Сказать честно, я и не думал что смогу снова вернуть такую цифру ведь после переезда всё это казалось просто чем то не сбыточным наверное. Многие к сожалению ушли не продолжив сотрудничество но знаете мои хорошие, я безумно благодарен тем кто даже во время переезда просто подписался не прося чего то сверхъестественного. Я искренне надеюсь что заветная цифра в 200 человек снова будет красоваться тут как нап…
custom 542936942131758692913custom 539789661823201971310custom 54227378114239188189
Sticker, posted without a caption
БЭЙ1БИ Opps. Н1 МНЕ ТЯЖЕЛ7Й ЛЮКС. 🤩
custom 542273781142391881815custom 542273828816528671714custom 542936942131758692914
Sticker, posted without a caption
Итоги июля от Мафиозницы. 1. Ты в отношениях.? — Нет. 2. Тебе нравится кто то.? — Я не знаю. 3. Хочешь ли ты отношений.? — 50/50. 4. Нравишься ли ты кому то.? — Всё может быть. 5. Ты худшая или лучшая версия себя.? — Даже не знаю, пусть будет лучшая. 6. На сколько процентов ты счастлива.? 80%. 7. Хочешь ли изменить что то в себе.? — Да. 8. Пьёшь/куришь.? — Нет. 9. Есть ли близкие друзья.? — И нет и да. 10. …
custom 539789661823201971310custom 54293694213175869299custom 54227378114239188188❤1
90. ✅
custom 53978966182320197136custom 54227382881652867176custom 54293694213175869295
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ZWJR7_YK8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 881,452 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Выходной. | Леди Мафия.” (@ZWJR7_YK8), 113 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZWJR7_YK8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.