A literal friend of the Robinhood team is pushing this, hearing today is going to be a big day Best meme to follow Cashcat 100% 0x485f166A5FcC3A523f683B681d194c8FE2b91b03
🔥1

Channel
@ZENO_CALLS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,273subscribers
-510 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001767944576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZENO_CALLS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZENO_CALLS |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 1,273 | -48 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 1,321 | -42 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 1,363 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 1,387 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,410 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,463 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 1,492 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 1,516 | -40 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 1,556 | -74 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 1,630 | -46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 1,676 | -75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,751 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,783 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,783 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
80 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 33 | 41.3% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 21.3% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 13.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 7.50% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A literal friend of the Robinhood team is pushing this, hearing today is going to be a big day Best meme to follow Cashcat 100% 0x485f166A5FcC3A523f683B681d194c8FE2b91b03
🔥1
SOL CAT I like the chart and name lets see 300k https://dexscreener.com/solana/eg1iwgeakrmm967er9f4pogmnbdcvvwnxkozuxpxybve
🔥1
$WIFCASH SOL just launched! Cat Wif Cash No longer broke. Absolutely stacked. The wealthiest feline on the Solana blockchain, wifcash https://t.me/cat_wifcash https://x.com/cat_wif_cash 7NmEq1b5ho9NcUoL6qXxYiN7n5XzicGNwASJiBvXpump
❤1👍1🔥1
Just bought a lot of $BOW on this dip at 800k They are a new launchpad on Robinhood, fully integrated with gmgn , axiom and more on the first day Ran hard and now in a dip but hearing they have some really good things they’re shipping soon Expecting this token to fly as people realize this is the best launchpad for Robinhood who are actually working 0x6f271710Cf296827E1249d305F9d3Ab8b77BBb03 https://dexscreener.…
👍2❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2❤🔥1👌1
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev jokingly described a pint of Guinness as "a meal in and of itself". He used this as a metaphor for robust things that stand on their own without needing extra parts. The Metaphor Tenev was comparing thick, hearty Guinness to heavy, complicated financial tech. He meant that sometimes you don't need fancy, extra layers (like "on-chain issuance" in crypto) to get the job done. Just like a dark…
🔥2👍1
I think this will run hard since we are on cat meta, Cashcat is the main runner so I bided the first crypto cat 0x4df3de9bd907f8cc2273beac2bd9448535c633e2 6k mcap
👍2❤1🔥1
ZENO CALLS 📈{ALL NETWORK} pinned «https://t.me/boost/ZENO_CALLS Can you guys boost my channel? Show me some love yall»
https://t.me/boost/ZENO_CALLS Can you guys boost my channel? Show me some love yall
❤1👍1🔥1
SOL HOBBES just launched. Ansem’s Cat as Ansem said it’s the 100M Cat. Ansem holding. FELg5ha73U3MTXJp2vtwZfNdJEMujVaCZPRVpun4pump https://t.me/hobbes_ansems_cat prof https://x.com/blknoiz06/status/1775539958113075375?s=46 https://x.com/hobbesansemcat
❤2👍1🔥1
Aped https://pump.fun/coin/6tNrGAXV8AKk7kUshEcMrBTL2uMbMYL8A3ViTVapump Real life Pink Bull Website: https://vietnamnews.vn/life-style/902929/large-pink-bull-in-cu-chi-district-captivates-locals.html X: https://x.com/i/communities/2008190944307499167
🔥2❤🔥1👍1
NICE GOAL ENGLAND 🏴 🙌
🔥7❤🔥1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ZENO_CALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ZENO_CALLS named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZENO CALLS 📈{ALL NETWORK}” (@ZENO_CALLS), 1,273 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZENO_CALLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.