Channel
@ZEFIECOMSECRETS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002028580640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZEFIECOMSECRETS |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 29 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZEFIECOMSECRETS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 29 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 30 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2023 to 9 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@everyone Need a QUICK , EASY TO IMPLEMENT and FREE METHODS To Bump up your feedback scores? Keep your eyes peeled for the latest post where we will be sharing a quick Copy paste method to everyone, so you can keep your pages protected.
❤️ 🤝 GUESS WHAT EVEN MORE LONG-TERM CLIENT WINS 2.8 -> 2.9 🤝 ❤️ @everyone We've been increasing this clients scores STEADILY & CONSISTENTLY📈 2.8 to 2.9 a 0.1 INCREASE🔥 I know we haven't been posting a lot of old client wins 🥺We haven't forgotten about you all 🥺 🫰 Appreciate each and every one of you🫰 🤝 Thank you for trusting us 🤝 Here's to scaling to new heights in 2024🚀
👍1
❤️ 🙇♂️ EVEN MORE LONG TERM CLEINT WINS 1.3 --> 1.4 🙇♂️ ❤️ @everyone Again another Long-term client trusting ZEFI Because we have the TRACK RECORD and treat all clients as* family*🫰 Score went from 1.3 to 1.4 a 0.1 increase A small win but we all know what ZEFI can do
🫶 👏 ANOTHER LONG TERM CLIENT WIN 2.5 --2.7 @everyone👏 🫶 Long term client trusted with another one of their pages🤝 🦾 Because they know what results ZEFI can deliver CONSISTENTLY🦾 IN 1 week Bumped the score from 2.5 to 2.7 a 0.2 increase
🤑 🇼 ADS SCALED DOWN? SCORE STILL INCREASED? 1.6 --> 1.7 🇼 🤑 @everyone This week Zefi has been pulling some black magic for cleints scores 🧙♂️ In this case client did not communicate they scaled down ads With an eager attitude to solve the issue , We worked out the cleint scaled down their ads. 🪄 We quickly made changes and managed to bump their score up by +0.1🫰 This could've been a disaster but we TURNED IT A
🎉 🤯 NO AGENCY HAS PULLED THIS OFF (Cloaking and Running a Black Hat Offer) 1.7 --> 2.1 🤯 🎉 @everyone NAME ONE AGENCY THAT HAS SUCCESSFULLY INCREASED SCORES FOR SOMEONE CLOAKING THEIR ADS... (Cloaking Just means their ads can only be seen in certain situation) While running some shady offers... 🫥 NO other agency have been able to increase this cleints score...UNTIL... 🙏 They switched to Zefi... We care about del…
📣 📣 Can't Advertise Due to Low Feedback Score? PAGE PROTECTION IS BACK & FREE for ALL clients on a monthly package @everyone Was valued at $500 NOW FREE FOR ALL MONTHLY PACKAGE CLIENTS That means: IF YOU HAVE ORDERED MONTHLY FEEDBACKS FROM US THIS SERVICE IS FREE FOR YOU WHAT IS COMES WITH: ✅ Documents Tailored Submission ✅ Insider Push On the Backend ✅ Never Have to Cycle Pages Again ✅ Unbannable Pages For Bad P…
🥳 NEW CLEINT WIN 1.2 -> 2.5 🥳 @everyone New client was super sceptical, but he took the leap of faith👏 It paid off 📈 🏆 ZEFI delivered a quick win for our new client💸 ONLY 1 week in we took their score from 1.2 (close to being restricted)to 2.5 (Comfortable able to advertise)🤯 A HUGE 1.3 increase.
🙀 LOW SCORES LEAD TO UNPROFITABLE ADS (a 0.6 increase in score led to profitable ads?)🙀 @everyone Unprofitable ads? 🤕 MEDIA BUYING STRATEGY NOT HITTING THE SAME ANYMORE? 🥴 CREATIVE TEST DRIVING YOU NUTS? No matter what you do... your ads still remain unprofitable?📉 Well same story for this client 😕 We identified his low score was the ROOT cause, 🧐 NOT their ads or media buying strategy 🚨 We started dripping…
🚨 ANOTHER DUAL PAGE INCREASE 2.4 -> 3.2 (0.8 INCREASE) 2.5 -> 2.7 (0.2 INCREASE)🚨 @everyone 🎉 LONG TERM CLIENT WIN🎉 We set the expectation that Feedback scores progress will NOT be linear. Client understood this, stuck by us and TRUSTED the process. Even when scores were dropping After 3 weeks of ups and downs 💹 We hit INCREASES for BOTH PAGES:🤑 📈 2.4 -> 3.2 (0.8 Increase) 🔥 2.5 -> 2.7 (0.2 Increase) 💸 In t…
🐳 🤑 ROUGH START IN DECEMBER 3.3 Drop --> back to 3.8 @everyone 🤑 🐳 ☔️ Dips will happen especially during busy periods when customer service is overwhelmed😟 Or uncontrollable factors like random shipping delays😮💨 and manufacturing errors...🙄 This client was overwhelmed with orders, and their team couldn't respond to enquiries in time...😵💫 Dropping their score from 3.9 to 3.3 ... 😥 Panic set in because througho…
❤1
😱 🚨 HOURS AWAY FOR BAN 1.1 -> 1.5 @everyone🚨 😱 Yellow box of doom ' Your business is close to having it's advertising disabled'😶🌫️ 😬 Never fails to give us cold sweats... thinking ' damn is this it for my page? '😮💨 Especially for this client with a score of 1.1 (literally hours away from a restriction)🫥 Our team jumped into action QUICKLY...🦸♂️ 💉 Revived their score from 1.1 -> 1.5 🚀 MOST IMPORTANTLY the YE…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ZEFIECOMSECRETS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZEFI ECOM SECRETS 🚀” (@ZEFIECOMSECRETS), 29 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZEFIECOMSECRETS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.