Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Yya_remont

@Yya_remont

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,417subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002572099647
TypeChannel
Username@Yya_remont
Description«Развалины-Дар, руины -путь к преображению» По вопросам сотрудничества @msktsnkmee
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yya_remont

Growth

18,41718,45718,4379 August 2026 — 18,456 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,452 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,448 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,429 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,417 subscribers9 August 202614 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,411–18,463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:4918,417-12
13 Aug 2026, 11:2418,429-17
12 Aug 2026, 12:0418,446-2
11 Aug 2026, 09:4418,448-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:1718,452-5
9 Aug 2026, 10:5218,457+1
9 Aug 2026, 03:4718,456first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 18,417 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,840
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held13 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total62,890
Reactions total1,597
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
388
Videos
441
Links
178

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,597 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72045.1%
🔥35522.2%
👍21613.5%
😁1408.77%
❤‍🔥553.44%
🥰483.01%
👀201.25%
🥴120.751%
👻100.626%
👏90.564%
🤮60.376%
😱40.25%
👎10.063%
🙈10.063%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,980 views232 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

150🥰45👍29❤‍🔥8

8 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈6,180 views72 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, пора всерьёз задуматься о будущем. Хочется понимать, что будет дальше, какие у меня есть перспективы и что можно сделать уже сейчас, чтобы в будущем чувствовать себя спокойно и независимо. Что со мной будет в 50, 60, 70 лет? Зная себя, мне всегда будет хотеться большего. И я понимаю, что рассчитывать только на один источник дохода в будущем — не лучший вариант. Села гуглить, что вообще с этим делать. И ту

43🔥13❤‍🔥9😁3😱3🙈1

8 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈4,970 views139 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

По возвращении будем с вами класть фартук на кухне вот этой плиточкой. Я заказала её перед отъездом и надеюсь, что она уже ждёт меня в магазине. Приеду, заберу — и предстоит нам красиво её выложить. Надеюсь, всё получится!

94👍35❤‍🔥10

8 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC≈4,790 views129 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

А это уже сегодня) Покой нам только снится😁

👍8336🔥6❤‍🔥2😁2

8 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈4,040 views143 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Вчера я приехала в Москву))

🔥8142👍17❤‍🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈5,120 views80 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

И вот этооо😁😁

😁5410👻10❤‍🔥4🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈4,620 views74 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Почему они так любят куриные лапки ?😁😁

😁5414❤‍🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈5,250 views192 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как теперь покупать вещи в России, я вообще не представляю. Цена и качество здесь просто поражают. Какие местные бренды продаются в Китае и по каким ценам — это что-то невероятное. Такого качества вещей в России практически нет. А если и есть что-то действительно хорошее, то стоит это каких-то безумных денег. Поэтому я искренне считаю, что есть большой смысл приезжать сюда хотя бы раз в полгода и обновлять гардероб

127🔥41👍20❤‍🔥3😱1

5 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈4,440 views108 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

70👍24🔥11🥰3

5 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC≈5,110 views106 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Если будете в Гуанчжоу, обязательно загляните в этот ресторан. На фото выше — не он, а уличная еда. Здесь вам точно не подадут куриные лапки. 😄 Это невероятно вкусный ресторан вьетнамской кухни с огромными порциями. Всё, что мы здесь пробовали, было просто потрясающим. Если закажете два блюда на двоих, скорее всего, даже не сможете всё доесть. Обычно у входа стоит большая очередь. Но мы просто с каменными лицами пр

68👀20🔥12❤‍🔥5👎1

5 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC≈4,360 views99 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кому куриных лапок?)))

🔥37😁2716🥴12🤮6❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈5,520 views100 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7517👏8

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Yya_remont. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 698,134 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yya_remont” (@Yya_remont), 18,417 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yya_remont.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.