Channel
@Yusra_institute
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,029subscribers
+1,759 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002677346372 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yusra_institute |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yusra_institute |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 2,029 | +901 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 1,128 | +15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 1,113 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 1,131 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 1,145 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 1,166 | +896 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 270 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 272 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 270 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 86.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وقتی یک لباس یا اثر هنری زیبا میبینی معمولاً چه چیزی بیشتر توجهت رو جلب میکنه؟
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3
الهام گرفتن یا کپی کردن؟ در مسیر یادگیری طراحی لباس، خیلیها با یک سؤال روبهرو میشن: «اگه از کار طراحهای دیگه الهام بگیرم، یعنی دارم کپی میکنم؟» پاسخ اینه: نه. الهام گرفتن، بخشی از مسیر رشد هر هنرمند و طراحه. هیچ طراح حرفهای در یک فضای خالی رشد نمیکنه. ما از طبیعت یاد میگیریم. از فرهنگ. از تاریخ. از معماری. از کار طراحهای دیگه. اما تفاوت در یک مرحله اتفاق میافته: جایی که اونچه دیدیم رو با نگاه خ…
❤4
الهام گرفتن یا کپی کردن؟ مرز این دو کجاست؟ مدرسه طراحی لباس یسرا | @Yusra_Institute
❤4
اگر قرار باشه یک لباس برای یک نفر خاص طراحی کنی اولین چیزی که درباره اون فرد میخوای بدونی چیه؟
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤🔥3
یک طراح حرفهای، اول انسان رو میبینه؛ بعد لباس رو.
❤3❤🔥1👍1
طراح لباس برای چه کسی طراحی میکنه؟ گاهی وقتی درباره طراحی لباس صحبت میکنیم، تمام توجه ما به خود لباس میره. رنگ. فرم. پارچه. جزئیات. اما پشت هر لباس، یک سؤال مهمتر وجود داره: این لباس برای چه انسانی طراحی شده؟ یک طراح حرفهای فقط به این فکر نمیکنه که یک لباس زیبا باشه. اون فکر میکنه: آیا این لباس راحته؟ آیا با سبک زندگی فرد هماهنگه؟ آیا باعث میشه کسی احساس بهتری نسبت به خودش داشته باشه؟ آیا شخصیت و…
❤🔥3❤2
هدف طراحی لباس، چه چیزیه؟ مدرسه طراحی لباس یسرا | @Yusra_Institute
❤2
طراح لباس برای چه کسی، طراحی میکنه؟ مدرسه طراحی لباس یسرا | @Yusra_Institute
❤5
سلام و وقت همگی بخیر آمادهاید پستهای امروز رو شروع کنیم؟ فقط همزمان اینکه من دارم پستها رو آماده میکنم، بهم راجب دغدغه هاتون توی آموزش بگید، اینکه چه چیزی رو بیشتر دوست دارید، چرا از شروع میترسید و .... میتونید بهم توی ناشناس، آیدی که در بیو نوشتم بگید
❤5
امروز اگر بخواهی از یک چیز الهام بگیری کدام را انتخاب میکنی؟
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خلاقیت، یک هدیه محدود نیست؛ یک مهارت قابل رشد است.
❤5
من خلاق نیستم؛ میتونم طراح لباس بشم؟ یکی از بزرگترین ترسهایی که جلوی شروع خیلی از افراد رو میگیره، این جمله است: «من خلاق نیستم.» اما واقعاً خلاقیت یعنی چی؟ آیا یعنی اینکه یک نفر ناگهان یک ایده عجیب و کاملاً جدید به ذهنش برسه؟ نه. در طراحی، خلاقیت بیشتر از اینکه پیدا کردن چیزی از هیچ باشه، یعنی دیدن ارتباطهایی که دیگران کمتر میبینن. یک طراح از طبیعت الهام میگیره. از معماری. از فرهنگ. از یک خاطره. از یک …
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yusra_institute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وقتی یک لباس یا اثر هنری زیبا میبینی معمولاً چه چیزی بیشتر توجهت رو جلب میکنه؟
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر قرار باشه یک لباس برای یک نفر خاص طراحی کنی اولین چیزی که درباره اون فرد میخوای بدونی چیه؟
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
امروز اگر بخواهی از یک چیز الهام بگیری کدام را انتخاب میکنی؟
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
یک لباس که همیشه دوست داشتی رو به یاد بیاور. به نظرت چه چیزی باعث شده برات جذاب باشه؟
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yusra Fashion Institute” (@Yusra_institute), 2,029 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yusra_institute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.