Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᯏ ‌⃘᳣⵿ִׅ֯ؔؔ᷍ᩨ‌‌𝄞‌۫۫ ‌‌ࣲ⃰᷄‌᷏ꫭ⃟፝‌𐇽⃔᷼ᩘ᷼𝓶ᩧ᷼ᩧᩚᮢᰰᩨ‌͡𝔂‌⃔ 𝓲͡ᩘ𝓷ᩚᮢᰰ𝓯ᩨ‌𐇽𝓸𓏼‌‌፝֟‌‌ꨲ᳟ۣ.ྀི፝֟ຼ᷐ꨵ𑪋𑪊⃕ 𝇃𝇂𝇄ִ 𞋯ᰰ

Channel

ᯏ ‌⃘᳣⵿ִׅ֯ؔؔ᷍ᩨ‌‌𝄞‌۫۫ ‌‌ࣲ⃰᷄‌᷏ꫭ⃟፝‌𐇽⃔᷼ᩘ᷼𝓶ᩧ᷼ᩧᩚᮢᰰᩨ‌͡𝔂‌⃔ 𝓲͡ᩘ𝓷ᩚᮢᰰ𝓯ᩨ‌𐇽𝓸𓏼‌‌፝֟‌‌ꨲ᳟ۣ.ྀི፝֟ຼ᷐ꨵ𑪋𑪊⃕ 𝇃𝇂𝇄ִ 𞋯ᰰ

@Yuihirasovaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003937093457
TypeChannel
Username@Yuihirasovaaa
Created3 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yuihirasovaaa

Growth

104229166.527 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 104 subscribers28 Aug 2026, 05:58 — 229 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 16:1528 Aug 2026, 05:58
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 05:58229+125
27 Aug 2026, 16:15104first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 229 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total1,166
Reactions total141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 7 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52021404527860534513614.2%
custom 5202163473810755272239.09%
custom 5201941020274627250187.11%
💘166.32%
custom 5425138041012382757145.53%
🎉145.53%
custom 5201726843140483062135.14%
🦄124.74%
custom 5422873888872758210114.35%
🥰103.95%
custom 547208668071228142293.56%
❤‍🔥93.56%
custom 520195363459358075572.77%
custom 539549368281416045572.77%
custom 520211750907076011162.37%
custom 520646923435957234062.37%
custom 522657862342673254762.37%
custom 521983538303809197751.98%
custom 539534597459388440851.98%
🍓51.98%
7 further kinds218.30%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Yuihirasovaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC2 viewsread 27 August 2026

Ребят дайте красивые гифки оч надо

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC17 viewsread 27 August 2026

смотрет.

Signed .𝖼݃‌⃔𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌ჩ⃪᮫ؔ⃗‌𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕ 𝖼݃‌⃔ჩ⃪᮫ؔ⃗‌𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕𝐧⃪ֵֶׂۭ֘֯ۚ.

27 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC12 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @cathachanPhoto

🌟🌟 🌟 🐏🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷❕🤩🤩 🤩📡:: ❤️ата чан в поиске людей для поста "love list..." 📃 🌟 🐏🌟сё, что вам нужно сделать, это отправить в комментарии. . 🐏 ㅤㅤㅤㅤсвой ник в моно‼️ ㅤ🤍🦄 :: До 11:00 по мск. 29.08. 🥂🩷🩷юбой может поучаствовать в этом, прошу, не стесняйтесь! мы ждём всех инфокмщиков. 🩷

Signed .𝖼݃‌⃔𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕𝐭᪰‌⃔‌ܵۜ‌︪‌‌ჩ⃪᮫ؔ⃗‌𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕ 𝖼݃‌⃔ჩ⃪᮫ؔ⃗‌𝐚̶๊𝆋𐇽᳕𝐧⃪ֵֶׂۭ֘֯ۚ.

27 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC17 viewsread 27 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC12 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @sairissainfoVideo

ㅤㅤ 𝓲nteractive from . . 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐚 ㅤ🎶 ♔ㅤ𝔀𝔀 . ㅤㅤ𝓴ак𝐚я вы ㅤㅤㅤㅤ г𝐚ча 𝓒траш𝐮лк𝐚 ? ִㅤ︶ִّ֯᤺⏝֯ؔۜ.ㅤㅤ𝓨слов𝐮я :: 𝟏. пдп на м𝐞ня 𝟐. 𝐩т любым 𝐜п𝐨с𝐨бом 𝟑. д𝐨к𝐮 𝐩т + юз моно шр𝐮фт𝐨м ㅤㅤ𝐦ест𝐚 :: 13 / 10 ㅤ♯бронь — икджо、бомбом、локьюм、мефиша、мираи、ашра、 зкз ㅤ 𝓞тк𝐩ыт𝐨 || закрыто、 жду брони

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC35 viewsread 27 August 2026

УРА 100 ПДП

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC67 views14 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Poll

🤍🤍🤍 🔤

  1. 🤍iller 🔴35%
  2. 🔤nnocent ✅71%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 52021404527860534516custom 52021634738107552722custom 52039471007143445042custom 52041328967045971012custom 52063119526572039061custom 52064567231198358381

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC73 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Считаете ли вы меня тру ирл Юи? Если да! Нажми на кнопку

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC60 viewsread 27 August 2026

Достаточно нишевое оформление поста

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC68 views15 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤➖✏️➖🤩☺️⚫️🤩🎀 🅰️🅰️ 🌟🌟 🔆🔆🔆 🔹🔠🤍🔤🔤 🌟💕 🗝🤩🤩🔤🔡🔤 🔠➖🥬 ✏️✏️➖🤩☺️ ⚫️ Условия : 1️⃣🤩быть подписанным на канал без дальнейшей отписки 2️⃣🤩Рт в свое инфо / активный канал 3️⃣🤩доки в комм , фото своего профиля и юз 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ : 8️⃣❎1⃣5⃣ Бронь : сеня , аспирин 🅰️ткрыто / закрыто

custom 52021404527860534516custom 52064692343595723405custom 52021634738107552724

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

27 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC69 viewsread 27 August 2026

Сам интерактив будет на 10-15 человек

Signed ˚₊‧꒰ა 𝑀𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒾 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

26 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC98 views36 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🎀➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖🎀 Предлагайте мне мью под постом!

custom 520214045278605345112custom 520194102027462725010custom 520216347381075527210custom 52063119526572039062custom 52041328967045971011custom 52064692343595723401

Signed ꒰ঌ 𐙚₊˚ 𝑴𝒊𝒓𝒂𝒊˚₊𐙚 ໒꒱

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yuihirasovaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

🤍🤍🤍 🔤

  1. 🤍iller 🔴35%
  2. 🔤nnocent ✅71%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᯏ ‌⃘᳣⵿ִׅ֯ؔؔ᷍ᩨ‌‌𝄞‌۫۫ ‌‌ࣲ⃰᷄‌᷏ꫭ⃟፝‌𐇽⃔᷼ᩘ᷼𝓶ᩧ᷼ᩧᩚᮢᰰᩨ‌͡𝔂‌⃔ 𝓲͡ᩘ𝓷ᩚᮢᰰ𝓯ᩨ‌𐇽𝓸𓏼‌‌፝֟‌‌ꨲ᳟ۣ.ྀི፝֟ຼ᷐ꨵ𑪋𑪊⃕ 𝇃𝇂𝇄ִ 𞋯ᰰ” (@Yuihirasovaaa), 229 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yuihirasovaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.