Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CC💕的小窝

Channel

CC💕的小窝

@Yuer88866

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,478subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003969372348
TypeChannel
Username@Yuer88866
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yuer88866

Growth

2,3972,4782,437.56 August 2026 — 2,397 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,435 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,452 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,478 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,385–2,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:352,478+26
13 Aug 2026, 10:142,452+17
10 Aug 2026, 03:322,435+37
7 Aug 2026, 04:502,398+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:332,397first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.4%
avg views ÷ 2,478 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,892
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5079.4%
🤡711.1%
🔥69.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,230 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

又是被夸的一天,真开心🥳

1🤡1

10 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,300 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

身材:166,46,c胸,皮肤白皙光滑,A4腰无小肚子,翘臀,筷子腿 课室:整体布置的干净温馨,床单有用床钉固定,很细心。CC上班不抽烟,很敬业,有只剪短毛的拿破仑白猫儿,很可爱很好撸。 如约准时到见到CC,纯欲风妆容,白皮,吊带短裤露脐,整体很精致,讲普通话御姐音,四川话是萌妹甜妹儿音,好听爱听!聊开了情绪价值蛮高的! YyY,szx,递漱口水帮洗帮擦,眼神互动很勾魂, 上床后🐍吻很有感,🐍了好一会儿。主动提可胸推臀推,皮肤接触光滑,边滑边摸,口活无齿感全覆盖,各种旋转舔蛋蛋和深喉,期间会不断眼神互动,很销魂。女上会各种摇,diao感很紧致,主动俯身舌吻。换cjs,看着美脸美眼,DOi感觉更好,反馈很自然,呻吟声好听,主动🐍,褶皱感收缩感套环感都有,感觉到了,反馈也逐渐强烈,爽爽出水,又温存了会,亲了亲。 课后坐沙发休息想抽烟,CC很贴心拿出一次性烟灰缸和打开客厅窗户通风,她还能忍住不抽,真的厉害。又聊了会天,不舍地离

2🔥2🤡1

5 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈4,110 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

【时间】:2026-07-03 【老师】:@Ccc6636 【留名】:Hsien 【费用】:1400p 【评价】:👍 超级好评 【人照】:9.0 【颜值】:9.0 【身材】:9.0 【服务】:9.5 【态度】:10.0 【环境】:10.0 【综合】:9.41 【过程】: 偶然刷到照片感觉非常喜欢,抱着总要见见的心态 立马就预约了时间,最近上海雨大怕堵车便提前出门,但老师排课很宽松 区别很多老师不赶着催人来 一看就很注重体验 好感度一下上来。 遥控开门先见到的是小猫咪,才是CC。第一眼就放大我的瞳孔,因为是头课妆容保持的很好,人照基本无差,手臂和腿能看见皮肤包养的很好 白白的,而且是笔直的筷子腿。胸前有个小小的纹身,无伤大雅,不是符文战士那种。 进门交了水费并不着急干活,先是坐沙发很主动寒暄一番,还关心我鞋子有没有湿,谈吐间可以感觉到没有一点风尘气。 眼看正式还没办,直接携手进浴室,调水温清洗,贴贴,吃嘴子,一套全自动,还来了SZ

4🔥2

12 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC≈6,920 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

妹妹颜值高身材好,妥妥的网红女神,不聊骚不墨迹,配合度非常高,温柔又贴心,热情又健谈,有着初恋女友般的甜蜜,又有邻家妹妹的温暖,房间干净整洁,屋里温度合适,女上非常带感,两个大白兔疯狂跳跃,以后一定还会再来的,请大家善待妹妹,有福共享

1

10 Jun 2026, 05:14 UTC≈7,130 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

有没有喜欢小喵咪的~😘喵喵喵

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yuer88866. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,285,389 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CC💕的小窝” (@Yuer88866), 2,478 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yuer88866.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.