Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Your Time🇨🇭

@Yourtime_tma

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,003subscribers

-578 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003988380827
TypeChannel
Username@Yourtime_tma
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 16 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yourtime_tma

Growth

17,00317,58117,2927 August 2026 — 17,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,581 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,557 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,490 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,304 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,147 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,003 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -578. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,916–17,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:0717,003-144
12 Aug 2026, 08:5217,147-49
11 Aug 2026, 09:0617,196-108
10 Aug 2026, 08:2017,304-186
9 Aug 2026, 05:0417,490-67
8 Aug 2026, 07:0817,557-24
7 Aug 2026, 17:1517,581no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:0317,581first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 17,003 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,910
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (16 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total40,170
Reactions total885
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

885 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36240.9%
custom 587282834227253088418520.9%
custom 535726666999348563617619.9%
custom 519737180213689297613114.8%
👌313.50%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 885reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 21 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
59
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Yourtime_tma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC377 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

11custom 53572666699934856369custom 51973718021368929766custom 58728283422725308846

6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC518 views55 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇨🇭 ❤️ A message to YOU ❤️ You walk. Your watch mines $TIME You stake that $TIME and it pays you in TON The TON comes from three places, and only these three: · people minting their watches as NFT · royalties and fees when watches are traded · Badge sales 80% of mint and royalty revenue goes to the staking pool. 20% of every Badge sale goes there too. That's the whole engine WHAT IT DOESN'T COME FROM There

28custom 535726666999348563611custom 587282834227253088410👌3custom 51973718021368929763

5 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC683 views40 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19custom 535726666999348563611custom 587282834227253088410

4 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC872 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇨🇭 SOLD OUT in 1 minutes 💰 BTC Case - Boost Claim combining up to 20 watches ; 60% discount on x2 claim! 🎞 You Tube Case - Boost Claim combining up to 10 watches ; 40% discount on x2 claim! 😖 Diablo Case - Boost Claim combining up to 10 watches; 40% discount on x2 claim! °We work exactly like a swiss watch

9custom 58728283422725308847custom 53572666699934856364

3 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,110 views31 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

🇨🇭 TOMORROW °We work exactly like a swiss watch

custom 53572666699934856361110custom 58728283422725308846👌2custom 51973718021368929762

2 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,300 views45 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🇨🇭 This time, it is you who will decide what goes into the fire! BASIS °We work exactly like a swiss watch

21custom 519737180213689297614custom 587282834227253088410

1 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,300 views33 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇭 THE GRAIL · ROLEX ⌚️ Want to claim the most valuable and high-end prize? Take part in an exclusive lottery featuring a genuine Rolex watch from our partner and make your mark! To participate, you’ll need the project’s branded badge; beyond granting entry to the main Rolex giveaway, it offers a host of utilities that boost your potential in the upcoming Airdrop! A real Rolex Datejust, and 900 vaults still sealed O

13custom 58728283422725308848custom 53572666699934856367custom 51973718021368929765

31 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,120 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 535726666999348563617custom 587282834227253088486

30 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,360 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 535726666999348563615custom 51973718021368929766custom 587282834227253088454

29 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,580 views55 reactions59 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

26custom 587282834227253088416custom 519737180213689297610custom 53572666699934856363

28 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,800 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇭 We are launching a daily lottery with a prize pool and fair rules! Currently, only badge holders can participate, but anyone who uses the Burn (Forge) function can accumulate tickets for future participation 🎁 To take part, a badge holder needs to go to the "Grail" section on the app's main page and select a box from the game board. There are 100 boxes on the board in total. Participants can choose any available

18custom 58728283422725308848custom 53572666699934856365custom 51973718021368929764

26 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,860 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🇨🇭 We congratulate all project participants on a new, important achievement: the Genesis watches are fully assembled! The principle of causality prevents us from returning to the past! However, the Your Time project takes a fair approach to its community and is launching the Reclaim feature! Project participants who received our unique mining watches more than 30 days ago but failed to mint or use them for mining -

15👌10custom 58728283422725308849custom 53572666699934856364

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Yourtime_tma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 165,210 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Your Time🇨🇭” (@Yourtime_tma), 17,003 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yourtime_tma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.