Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝖸𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗉 𝖲𝖾𝖼 𝖶𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽ᨳଓ

@Yolipsec

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

339subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003738840706
TypeChannel
Username@Yolipsec
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yolipsec

Growth

2953393177 August 2026 — 295 subscribers8 August 2026 — 295 subscribers15 August 2026 — 339 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:47339+44
8 Aug 2026, 08:05295no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:02295first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 339 subscribers
Avg views / post
99.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,997
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51972537764355936015322.0%
custom 54337908882853338594920.3%
custom 53235061955273948372912.0%
custom 5915914358969340814249.96%
custom 5434092751471796775197.88%
custom 5307841543560784456177.05%
custom 6068832421820767505124.98%
custom 592501134451540542393.73%
custom 616818779290495241293.73%
custom 606911913665757882362.49%
custom 607098004290772024352.07%
custom 607138952938468835041.66%
custom 607106135093360078920.83%
custom 531022668922410908010.415%
custom 606915984006264323010.415%
custom 627407382067649865710.415%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Yolipsec. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

50k - @yolili17 t.me/nft/JellyBunny-62082

custom 53235061955273948371

5 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Add post Prices- 1Link Sub 50 - 3500ks Sub 100- 6000ks 1Bear - 1000ks 2bear+ - 900ks(rate) Dm - @yolili17 #yoli

custom 54337908882853338595custom 54340927514717967753custom 59250113445154054232

3 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC51 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Fandango Collection🍓 65K t.me/nft/IceCream-36045 45K t.me/nft/TimelessBook-63484 55K t.me/nft/BunnyMuffin-49278 55K t.me/nft/BunnyMuffin-36206 55K t.me/nft/JellyBunny-62082 45K t.me/nft/MoodPack-64070 45K t.me/nft/MoodPack-155736 45K t.me/nft/IceCream-294359 40K t.me/nft/SnowGlobe-53080 55K t.me/nft/SpringBasket-123805 55K t.me/nft/SpringBasket-78078 50K t.me/nft/SnowGlobe-47476 30K t.me/nft/BigYear-33824 25K t.me/nf

custom 51972537764355936014custom 54337908882853338593custom 54340927514717967752

3 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC48 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Channel ရောင်းဖို့ရှိ Userစျေး sub 2.7K - ❗️❗️ sub 300+Gp - 13K(lv7) Dm - @yolili17 #Yoli

custom 53235061955273948373custom 53078415435607844562custom 54340927514717967751

1 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC65 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ t.me/nft/PartySparkler-7910

custom 51972537764355936016custom 54337908882853338594

1 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC63 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

25K🌟ပြီး t.me/nft/InstantRamen-171010

custom 59159143589693408147custom 53078415435607844563

30 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC88 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

28Kstarပြီး 25Kစတားစိုက် ❗️❗️❗️❗️ t.me/nft/LolPop-21176 @yolili17

custom 53235061955273948375custom 54340927514717967754custom 51972537764355936012custom 54337908882853338591custom 59250113445154054231

29 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC115 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 📎 @nftgroup26 ⏰1 to 100 #yoli

custom 519725377643559360117custom 53235061955273948377custom 54337908882853338592custom 54340927514717967752custom 59159143589693408142custom 61681877929049524121

29 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC113 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

" 🧁 " လေးယူ ss ချ #Yoli

custom 54337908882853338598custom 51972537764355936015

29 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC121 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

rec choice 🧸U

custom 61681877929049524126custom 51972537764355936013custom 53078415435607844563custom 53235061955273948373custom 54337908882853338593custom 54340927514717967753custom 59159143589693408143custom 59250113445154054233

29 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC163 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Prices- 55K t.me/nft/BunnyMuffin-36206 Dm - @yolili17

custom 543379088828533385914custom 51972537764355936016custom 53235061955273948376

28 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC146 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

38Kနဲ့ အလှလေးကို ရမယ် t.me/nft/RestlessJar-62641 Cmပိစိတော့ပါတယ် Dm - @yolili17

custom 59159143589693408147custom 51972537764355936013custom 59250113445154054233custom 53078415435607844562custom 61681877929049524122custom 54337908882853338591

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Yolipsec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 429,471 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖸𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗉 𝖲𝖾𝖼 𝖶𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽ᨳଓ” (@Yolipsec), 339 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yolipsec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.