Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

八重堂

@YaePub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,079subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433674128
TypeChannel
Username@YaePub
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YaePub

Growth

2,0792,0872,0837 August 2026 — 2,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,087 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,085 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,079 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,078–2,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:022,079-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:432,085-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:482,087no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:172,087first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

448 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24855.4%
10222.8%
🎉8318.5%
🕊51.12%
🥰40.893%
😢30.67%
👎20.446%
10.223%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2022 to 10 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Dec 2023, 09:07 UTC≈12,700 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

如果对 Telegram Premium 专属的自定义 emoji 感兴趣的话,可以参考由 Nahida🍃 整理的自定义 emoji 列表: https://t.me/AkashaTerminal/855 https://t.me/AkashaTerminal/856

👍183👎1

3 Feb 2023, 14:00 UTC≈21,600 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

推荐几个由他人维护的贴纸包 纳西妲表情包 作者不详 心海动态表情包 by Karako 希儿静态贴纸包 希儿动态贴纸包 布洛妮娅贴纸包 暗黑希儿贴纸包 by AleKarl 崩坏3· 终焉归始 光辉矢愿 雷鸣彻空 / 派蒙小零食 by Karako Nahida's Pack by Nahida🍃

👍2410🎉3

3 Feb 2023, 14:00 UTC≈22,800 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

频道下偶尔会有人留言问下载贴纸包的途径,我往往会推荐 @GIFDownloader_bot , 但这BOT最近下载整个贴纸包的功能好像有点抽风,不知道有没有更好的BOT选择?若有,欢迎留言。 顺带问一下,有没有由他人维护的较全的原神官方表情?

👍32🎉32

21 Jan 2023, 16:00 UTC≈20,500 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏮各位旅行者兔年春节快乐~🎇 频道主在这里祝各位身体健康,万事如意! 配图 团圆 by CAISENA

🎉68👍116🕊5😢1

27 Oct 2022, 05:38 UTC≈23,400 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

49👍11

27 Oct 2022, 05:38 UTC≈22,600 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

纳西妲表情包 原作者: Morlvoid 感谢 豆丁 的投稿

👍282😢2

22 Aug 2022, 06:12 UTC≈24,500 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍225

22 Aug 2022, 05:56 UTC≈22,800 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

崩坏3 贴纸包② 之前的包1满了,现创建包2

👍1941

22 Jun 2022, 07:26 UTC≈23,600 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

考虑整合一个 Seseren 的贴纸包,采用 Video Stickers 形式而不是 Animated Stickers 形式,并横向增添空白以达到 512px 要求。 贴纸来源我大概看了下,感觉 B站的 和 Discord的 差不多,具体使用哪个未定。 如果有建议,或是已有由他人维护的且较为完全的 Seseren 贴纸包,欢迎留言。 才发现 Seseren 只有后边发的贴纸才带透明背景 懒得抠图 想鸽了 🕊了

👍361👎1

17 Jun 2022, 07:34 UTC≈20,200 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍11🥰43

17 Jun 2022, 07:34 UTC≈18,600 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

崩坏3贴纸包 其实是挺久以前创建的,不过当初贴纸比较少,就没发。 后来就忘记了..

👍51

17 Jun 2022, 07:34 UTC≈17,900 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

3👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @YaePub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 196,573 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“八重堂” (@YaePub), 2,079 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YaePub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.