Channel
@YPJInformation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,808subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001790041464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YPJInformation |
| Created | 12 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YPJInformation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 1,808 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 1,809 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,811 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 1,812 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 1,812 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (13 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,078 |
| Reactions total | 139 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 69.4% | |
| 🕊 | 23 | 15.6% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 6.12% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.08% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.68% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.68% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The braids of the fighting woman are not only a symbol of resilience and the free will of women, but a reminder that justice, peace and freedom are only achieved through struggle and women's organisation.
❤2🕊2
Statement regarding the ongoing discussions Within the framework of the 29 January 2026 Agreement, our negotiations, as the Women’s Protection Units (YPJ), with Damascus are continuing. In April, we held a meeting with Minister of Defense Murhaf Abu Qasra, during which we also submitted a written draft outlining our vision and proposals. To this day, we have not been informed of any official proposal or decision by …
❤7😢1
Statement of the General Command of YPJ "It must be clearly understood that the threats directed against Shengal are not merely attacks on a particular geographical area; they are a direct assault on the political and social existence and authentic identity of the Kurdish people as a whole. The only genuine guarantee for protecting our Yazidi community lies in strengthening the system of democratic self-administrati…
👍4🕊3❤2
We remember the genocide and the historic resistance.against this. This must not happen again. Therefore: Self-defense is a natural right!
🕊9
In Remembrance of the 12th anniversary of the genocide in Shengal On August 3, 2014, ISIS attacked the region of Shengal and carried out a massacre. The forces of YPJ, YPG, and the guerrillas from the Free Mountains of Kurdistan, HPG, stood up to ISIS and saved thousands of lives. In order to answer these attacks the Self-defense Units of Shengal were formed and a counterattack was launched, liberating the region fr…
🕊6❤3👍2
"We remember with profound gratitude and love the revolutionaries, fighters, and commanders who came to the aid of our people, as well as the members of YJA Star, HPG, YPG, and YPJ who gave their lives on our land. In honor of their sacrifices and the blood they shed, we pledge to strengthen our organizational power." On the occasion of the 12th anniversary of the August 3, 2014, genocide in Shengal (Sinjar), the Th…
❤8👏1
In the beginning of 2026 a historical resistance took place in the neighborhoods of Aleppo, Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafiye. Now a new brochure was released, covering the urban warfare in Aleppo, including Interviews with YPJ Commanders and fighters. To read the full brochure in English, German or Kurdish: https://ypj-info.org/resources/
❤11
Yesterday the first Wheat Festival took place in Qamishlo. Wheat is part of the culture and life and has a deep-rooted tradition throughout Syria. And at a festival dedicated to the culture of life and women, YPJ naturally was part of it. YPJ, a life-giving force deeply intertwined with society.
❤9
Statement of Kongra Star Today, Kongra Star issued a statement condemning the attacks and divisions targeting the Kurdish people and women. Among other things, the women demanded that Rami al-Dahesh—who boasted about cutting off a YPJ fighter’s braid and remains at large—be held accountable for his actions.
🕊3🤝1
Kobane - a story of resistance Kobane, a small town in northern Syria on the border with Bakur (Northern Kurdistan, Turkey), has made history. The revolution of 19 July 2012 began in Kobane. And it was 2015 in Kobane that ISIS was defeated for the first time. With this video, we commemorate all those who lost their lives in the struggle for humanity and dignity, and pay tribute to 14 years of revolution. Even thoug…
❤7👏2⚡1
Today marks the 14th anniversary of the Rojava Revolution - a women's revolution, a people's revolution. A spark of hope and a flame of resistance in times of nationalism and war. A people building up their own institutions and defining their own way of a more free life. This spark glims until today and we congratulate all peoples, women and commemorate the martyrs, who payved the way so that we, the ones still stru…
❤15🔥2
The July 19 Revolution: A Global Model "The Rojava Revolution, which began on 19 July 2012, was presented to the world as a vision and conviction in free life. During the years that became known as the Spring of Peoples, authoritarian regimes responded to every demand for rights and freedom with repression and violence, seeking to exploit those movements for their own interests. In Rojava, however, the peoples of th…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @YPJInformation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 416,370 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YPJ Information & Documentation Office” (@YPJInformation), 1,808 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YPJInformation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.