Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 伊蕾娜端口主频道

Channel

伊蕾娜端口主频道

@YLNDK

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,532subscribers

+605 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001713602397
TypeChannel
Username@YLNDK
Description负责人 @nuomi_6 交流群 @qiumi0 伊蕾娜:一款用于测试基础防御的工具软件 ,可能我们的行为可能侵犯了您的权益,如果希望改进安全性
Created23 December 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/YLNDK

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,90415,53215,2187 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net +605. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,810–15,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:1115,532+15
10 Nov 2026, 00:5715,517-2
8 Nov 2026, 18:1115,519+20
7 Nov 2026, 15:1515,499+32
6 Nov 2026, 17:3615,467+5
5 Nov 2026, 17:3415,462+3
4 Nov 2026, 19:0915,459+5
3 Nov 2026, 17:3515,454-8
2 Nov 2026, 16:4515,462+14
1 Nov 2026, 13:3915,448+17
31 Oct 2026, 12:2815,431+25
30 Oct 2026, 12:0915,406+3
29 Oct 2026, 11:0715,403+2
28 Oct 2026, 10:2715,401+9
27 Oct 2026, 10:2815,392+12
26 Oct 2026, 12:5615,380-4
25 Oct 2026, 13:3015,384+74
24 Oct 2026, 16:1115,310+41
23 Oct 2026, 16:5615,269+2
21 Oct 2026, 18:0715,267first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 23 December 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.27%
avg views ÷ 15,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held105 (23 December 2022 – 11 November 2026)
Views total34,685
Reactions total825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
249
Videos
12
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,797 reactions across 103 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,50683.8%
❤1317.29%
😍362.00%
🥰251.39%
👏201.11%
👌170.946%
🌚150.835%
😁130.723%
🍌80.445%
😱70.39%
🔥60.334%
🤡50.278%
❤‍🔥30.167%
🌭30.167%
🍓10.056%
🤓10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2022 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 23:06 UTC559 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026

新版本端口依旧可玩😛 已适配新版本

👍16😱2

8 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,030 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🔗伊蕾娜端口2.4已推送 1.修复了软件已知问题 2.更新启动动画提升观感 🤕点击伊蕾娜2.4下载

👍28❤6👏2

8 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC853 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍33

8 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC812 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🔗伊蕾娜和平公益内核2.1更新公告 1.新增车辆绘制燃烧瓶铝热弹预警 2.优化布局 3.优化模拟漏打 下载链接:https://drive.uc.cn/s/78285ed93efc4?public=1

👍25

8 Nov 2026, 05:54 UTC833 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍33

8 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC776 views46 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍46

7 Nov 2026, 22:17 UTC789 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026

服务器卡顿导致没效果问题已处理☺️

👍25❤3

7 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC925 views39 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍39

7 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC918 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍33

3 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,610 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍20❤3👌1

1 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,650 views47 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🔗伊蕾娜端口2.3已推送 1.修复了已知问题,优化封包 2.更新启动动画提升观感 🤕点击伊蕾娜2.3下载

👍43❤2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @YLNDK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@YLNDK edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @YLNDK as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
31 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll195 voters

端口防高不

  1. yes63%
  2. no37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2022 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“伊蕾娜端口主频道” (@YLNDK), 15,532 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YLNDK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.