Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حَمِيد

Channel

حَمِيد

@YESHAMED

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,437subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795197186
TypeChannel
Username@YESHAMED
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YESHAMED

Growth

1,4371,4491,4437 August 2026 — 1,447 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,447 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,446 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,449 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,437 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 15 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,435–1,451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 05:141,437-12
15 Aug 2026, 13:181,449+8
11 Aug 2026, 15:061,441-5
8 Aug 2026, 07:541,446-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:021,447no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:031,447first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 1,437 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,507
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تصبحون على خير - عدا من يبيع عقله - 🌹 - الصورة عشان جماعة صابر وعدد ممن تابعهم من أدعياء الأثرية زورًا يقولون البخاري لا يثبت خلافة علي - ( استراتيجية الكذب ما يحتاج فلوس ولا علم ولا فهم )

7 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

احتراااااام وتوقير 🌹🌹🌹🌹 عَنِ الزُّبَيْرِ بْنِ عَدِيٍّ قَالَ : أَتَيْنَا أَنَسَ بْنَ مَالِكٍ فَشَكَوْنَا إِلَيْهِ مَا نَلْقَى مِنَ الْحَجَّاجِ فَقَالَ : اصْبِرُوا فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَأْتِي عَلَيْكُمْ زَمَانٌ إِلَّا الَّذِي بَعْدَهُ شَرٌّ مِنْهُ حَتَّى تَلْقَوْا رَبَّكُمْ سَمِعْتُهُ مِنْ نَبِيِّكُمْ ﷺ ( رواه البخاري 7068 ) قال البخاري : قَالَ عارمٌ : حدَّثنا مُعتمَرٌ حدثَ أَبِي عنْ عبدِ الرَّحمنِ صاحبِ السِّقايةِ قالَ :

7 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC176 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

أتدري من شر من النبطي إذا استعرب ؟ قال محمد بن عثمان بن أبي شيبة في مسائله : 89- حدثنا عبد الله بن محمد بن سالم قال سمعت محمد بن سعيد بن زائدة أو عبد الرحمن القطان أو غيرهما قد شككت فيه ولا أعلمه إلا عبد الرحمن قال : جاء محمد بن الصباح الأشعثي يخاصم إلى شريك فقال له محمد بن الصباح : أصلحك الله إنه نبطي مستعرب فقال شريك : ألا أدلك على من هو شر من ذلك ؟ عربي مستنبط

7 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC240 viewsread 7 August 2026

تغيير النبي ﷺ الأسماء للأحسن قال أبو داود في باب تغيير الاسم القبيح : حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ صَالِحٍ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ عَنْ مَعْمَرٍ عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنْ جَدِّهِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ لَهُ : مَا اسْمُكَ ؟ قَالَ : حَزْنٌ قَالَ : أَنْتَ سَهْلٌ قَالَ : لَا , السَّهْلُ يُوطَأُ وَيُمْتَهَنُ. قَالَ سَعِيدٌ : فَظَنَنْتُ أَنَّهُ سَيُصِيبُنَا بَعْدَهُ حُزُونَةٌ.

7 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC278 viewsread 7 August 2026

الحرص على متابعة النبي ﷺ قَالَ ابْنُ وَهْبٍ : أنا مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ عَنْ رَجُلٍ حَدَّثَهُ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَتْبَعُ أَمْرَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ وَآثَارَهُ وَحَالَهُ وَيَهْتَمُّ بِهِ حَتَّى كَانَ قَدْ خِيفَ عَلَى عَقْلِهِ مِنَ اهْتِمَامِهِ بِذَلِكَ ( غرائب مالك لابن المظفر 116 ) عَنْ مُوسَى بْنِ عُقْبَةَ عَنْ نَافِعٍ قَالَ : لَوْ نَظَرْتَ إِلَى ابْنِ عُمَرَ إِذَا اتَّبَعَ أَثَرَ النَّبِيّ

4 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC367 viewsread 7 August 2026

قَالَ ابْنُ وَهْبٍ : حَدَّثَنِي مَالِكٌ أَنَّ زَيْدَ بْنَ أَسْلَمَ كَانَ يَقُولُ : ابْنَ آدَمَ اتَّقِ اللَّهَ يُحِبَّكَ النَّاسُ وَإِنْ كَرِهُوا ( مسند الموطأ للجوهري 1 / 309 )

3 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

عامة الروايات التي ذكرتها عن مالك بين الصحيح والمقبول إن شاء الله

2 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC583 viewsread 7 August 2026

مهما كان التابعي أو العالم فاضلًا فقول الصحابة مقدم على من بعدهم احتج الإمام أحمد بأثر عن سعيد بن المسيب في عدم التسوية بين الشفتين في الدية فرد عليه إسحاق بن راهويه وقال : هما سواء لأنَّ قولَ علي وابن مسعود رضي الله عنهما أولى أن يتبع ( مسائل الكوسج 2507 ) ليس قصدي تحرير الخلاف في المسائل المذكورة إنما قصدي منهجية العلماء في ترتيب الأدلة فقول الله ﷻ ثم رسوله ﷺ مقدم على قول كل أحد وقول الصحابي مقدم على من بعده وق

2 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC504 viewsread 7 August 2026

مهما كان الصحابي أو العالم فاضلًا فقول رسول الله ﷺ أولى أن يتبع من قول أحد قال الإمام أحمد رحمه الله : لَا يَمْسَحُ عَلَى خُفَّيْهِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ ثَلَاثَةٍ وَلَيَالِيهِنَّ أَمْرُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ﷺ أَوْلَى أَنْ يُتَّبَعَ مِنْ قَوْلِ عُقْبَةَ بْنِ عَامِرٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ ( مسائل أبي داود 60 ) قَالَ الْمَرُّوذِيُّ : قِيلَ لأَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ : إِنَّهُمْ يَقُولُونَ : إِنَّ عَائِشَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهَا قَالَ

2 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC594 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الإمام أحمد كان كثيرًا ما يتبرأ من أقوال تنسب إليه ولم يقلها وهذا في حياته فما بالك كيف سيكون الكذب عليه بعد مماته ؟ إن شاء الله ننفي الكذب عن الإمام المبجل

2 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC469 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هذا نقل من الرسالة الكلام فيه يخالف جميع روايات الإمام أحمد أنه لا يوجب قضاء صيام التطوع بل أقصى ما يراه أن من قضاه فهو احتياط منه أما في هذه الرسالة كاتبها يوجب القضاء وهذا يخالف كل روايات أحمد في المسألة فيما أعلم وبالعموم الرسالة لا تشبه طريقة أحمد وفيها احتجاج بكثير أحاديث وآثار لا أصل لها ولا توجد في مصدر غير هذه الرسالة وأسلوبها ركيك ليس كلغة السلف في الكلام وقد سمعت من ينسبها إلى سهل التستري الصوفي لأنه موج

1 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC499 viewsread 7 August 2026

قال الذهبي عن كتاب الصلاة المنسوب إلى الإمام أحمد : هُوَ مَوْضُوْعٌ عَلَى الإِمَامِ ( سير أعلام النبلاء 11 / 330 ) وقال : وَكَذَلِكَ رِسَالَةُ المُسِيءِ فِي الصَّلاَةِ بَاطلَةٌ ( المصدر السابق 11 / 287 ) هو كما قال

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @YESHAMED. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,577 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حَمِيد” (@YESHAMED), 1,437 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YESHAMED.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.