Channel
@YANfintech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,929subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001823158302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YANfintech |
| Description | Инсайты, цифры, кейсы — всё, чтобы вы продавали много и счастливо. Финансовые и рекламные сервисы для бизнеса: https://pay.yandex.ru/business Чат канала: https://t.me/+p_0-qnvPDaZmZjk6 Поддержка: partners@pay.yandex.ru |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YANfintech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 4,929 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 4,933 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 4,933 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (13 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,806 |
| Reactions total | 237 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
243 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 29.2% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 21.8% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 3.70% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 3.70% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.06% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.412% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.412% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про The Вlack Swan, Bambule и Masa Madre слышали? Денис Бобков создал. А в интервью рассказал о трёх правилах, которые помогают ему строить такой успешный бизнес. Советуем досмотреть до конца. Там Денис задаёт вопрос, на который, по-хорошему, должен ответить любой предприниматель. 🍿 Смотреть интервью 😴 Подписаться на такой же острый канал Дениса
❤9🔥9🥰4👍1
Ставим медиапроект «Говорит дело», или разговоры, которые обычно не выходят за стены переговорных. 👏👏👏 На сцене: 👨🍳 Денис Бобков, The Вlack Swan и другие заведения 🤴 Андрей Мигунов, Poison Drop 🏃 Григорий Лазарев, Gri 🐶 Олег и Евгений Артёмовы, Staya 🏃♀️ Дарья Беззубцева, The Flex 🧑💼 Гузель Санжапова, Малый Турыш 🧑🎨 Роман и Александр Бычковы, base.dikiy Обсудили с ними, почему иногда лучше не расти быст…
❤8🔥6👍3
Помните, месяц назад мы показывали, как готовим интервью с предпринимателями? Что ж, пора распахнуть занавес… 🥁🥁🥁
🔥2❤1👍1
Чекаут Яндекс Пэй тем временем: https://pay.yandex.ru/business/checkout
🔥4👍3❤2😁1
Это снова «Это или то» — игра, в которой мы предлагаем на выбор два варианта ответа. Что вы предпочтёте сейчас: 😁 — продолжать тестировать свой чекаут в погоне за недостижимым идеалом ❤️ — один раз установить чекаут Яндекс Пэй
❤9😁5
В этом месяце будет четыре пятницы — и все с приставкой Пэй. 7, 14, 21 и 28 августа для клиентов наших партнёров — кешбэк до 10% баллами Плюса при оплате с Яндекс Пэй Завтра кешбэк начисляем так: 💸 10%, до 500 баллов — при оплате картой Пэй 💸 5%, до 300 баллов — при оплате другой картой или по СБП Так же будем начислять кешбэк за онлайн-покупки в остальные пятницы. А вот платить в офлайне станет ещё выгоднее: ке…
🔥6❤3👍2
На безналичную оплату приходятся 87% платежей в России, а значит, 87% клиентов надеются, что вы прочтёте нашу статью об эквайринге. Из статьи вы узнаете: 🟣 какой эквайринг предлагает самые низкие комиссии 🟣 с каким эквайрингом можно рабоать в любом месте 🟣 для какого эквайринга нужна ещё и онлайн-касса А вообще, мы рассказали обо всём, что важно знать в 2026 году. 🍿 Читать статью
👍3🔥2❤1
Posted without readable text
🔥9❤5👍5😁3
#как_там_со_статьями последние две недели: 4️⃣ поведали, чем так хорош Сплит для бизнеса 0️⃣ объяснили, что такое слип-чеки 🛍 рассказали, как заработать на перепродаже товаров 🍜 прикинули, с чего начать бизнес в маленьком городе и с чего — бизнес на дому 💻 разобрали также, как работает облачная касса 🔒 и расписали, как подключить стандарт PCI DSS для защиты платежей С любовью, ваш Яндекс Пэй для бизнеса 🏦
❤4👍2🔥2
Сегодня пятница, пора обрадоваться Сервис в ритейле высоко оценили: 🟣 на 88,3 пункта — в магазинах хлеба и выпечки 🟣 на 87,9 пункта — в аптеках 🟣 на 85,3 пункта — в строительных и хозяйственных магазинах Это всё — показатели выше среднего. Лидеры по качеству сервиса при этом — онлайн-магазины в целом Что особенно приятно, и там и там выше всего оценили этап оплаты: 🟣 на 4,55 балла из 5 — в офлайне 🟣 на 4,62 …
❤2👍1🔥1
Секонд-хенд в России превращается из чего-то маргинального в обычную историю: 🟣 это уже сложившийся рынок — его объём в 2025 году приблизился к 1 трлн ₽ 🟣 он растёт вровень с мировым рынком подержанной одежды — на 10% год к году 🟣 такими же темпами растёт и средний чек — сейчас он составляет 1245 ₽ Новая одежда становится дороже, а решения о покупке — вдумчивее, но дело не только в экономии. За самой низкой ценой…
👍3❤2🔥2
Мы рассказывали о ссылках на оплату то тут, то там, а теперь решили собрать всё в одной статье. Прежде чем идти к вам, прочитали статью ещё раз — и да, собрали всё: 🟣 как работает оплата по ссылке 🟣 в чём её преимущества для бизнеса 🟣 какие вообще бывают платёжные ссылки 🟣 где их использовать 🟣 как управлять платежами и возвратами 🟣 сколько это стоит и насколько соответствует закону Инструкция по созданию ссы…
❤3🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @YANfintech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А каким был самый крупный чек при оплате по QR-коду в 4️⃣ Сплит?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Каким был самый крупный чек при оплате по QR-коду?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 163,328 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яндекс Пэй для бизнеса” (@YANfintech), 4,929 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YANfintech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.