Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1,432. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,934–21,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:55
20,646
-39
15 Sept 2026, 09:39
20,685
-35
13 Sept 2026, 16:21
20,720
-36
11 Sept 2026, 19:55
20,756
-41
9 Sept 2026, 06:35
20,797
-64
5 Sept 2026, 19:14
20,861
-26
3 Sept 2026, 18:17
20,887
-26
2 Sept 2026, 12:36
20,913
-6
1 Sept 2026, 15:33
20,919
-20
31 Aug 2026, 13:28
20,939
-27
30 Aug 2026, 17:03
20,966
-30
29 Aug 2026, 14:28
20,996
-19
28 Aug 2026, 16:37
21,015
-33
27 Aug 2026, 13:16
21,048
-33
26 Aug 2026, 12:23
21,081
+13
25 Aug 2026, 15:42
21,068
+23
24 Aug 2026, 13:15
21,045
+19
22 Aug 2026, 21:25
21,026
+61
21 Aug 2026, 13:18
20,965
-3
20 Aug 2026, 09:52
20,968
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.17%
avg views ÷ 20,646 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
59 (17 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
10,118
Reactions total
711
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45m 15s
Average length
9m 03s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,375 reactions across 54 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,890
53.8%
❤
1,447
26.9%
❤🔥
461
8.58%
👍
248
4.61%
⚡
95
1.77%
👏
93
1.73%
🙏
75
1.40%
🥰
33
0.614%
🎉
15
0.279%
😍
12
0.223%
👌
6
0.112%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как сбываются мечты сильной женщины?
В мультфильме «Душа» есть один из самых жестоких моментов, которые я видел в кино.
Главный герой всю жизнь мечтает сыграть с великой джазовой группой. И вот мечта сбывается: свет, музыка, полный зал, аплодисменты.
А потом он выходит на улицу и понимает: внутри ничего не изменилось.🤷
Будто Вселенная должна была прислать уведомление:
«Поздравляем! Теперь вы счастливы», - но при…
СБРОС СТАРОЙ ВЕРСИИ.
Перед тем как сбросить кожу, змея начинает видеть хуже. Её глаза мутнеют, тело тускнеет, она прячется. Если не знать, что происходит, кажется: животное заболело и потеряло силу.
Это похоже на сильную женщину в кризисе.
И прежде чем кто-нибудь напишет: «Тален, ты сейчас сравнил женщину со змеёй?» - спокойно 😅
Во многих традициях змея - символ силы, мудрости и обновления: она оставляет оболочку…
Одиночество и потеря интереса, это редкая стадия пробуждения
В анкетах перед разборами мне регулярно встречается фраза:
«Последнее время я вообще никого не хочу видеть».
А следующей строкой человек начинает оправдываться 😅
«У меня хорошие друзья».
«Я люблю семью».
«Меня никто не обидел».
Человек ещё не отключил телефон, а уже выступает адвокатом всех людей, от которых хочет спрятаться.
Потому что внутри появляе…
Тень сильной женщины…
Начну с того, что Вы знаете, что я никого не рекламирую.
Но у меня есть бриллианты, которых я могу с гордостью вам представить
Есть очень мало людей, которым я готов доверить свою аудиторию. Мне важно быть уверенным не только в упаковке, но и в человеке и его работе.
Но есть эксперты, которых я рекомендую в закрытых кругах.
И одна из них завтра проведёт эфир: Kate_Miter
Эфир: «Как Тень Сил…
Неожиданное откровение пришло😏
Хотим такой эфир? 🤔
- «Как тень СИЛЬНОЙ ЖЕНЩИНЫ приводит к кризису и внутренней пустоте»
Дайте знать реакцией 🔥 ..Собираем 400 и делаю.
ЧЕМ ОБУЧЕНИЕ Система Внутреннего Прайда
ОТЛИЧАЕТСЯ ОТ КЛУБА
«МЕСТО СИЛЫ 11:11»?
Мне часто задают вопрос:
«Если я уже в клубе, зачем идти на обучение? Разве там не те же Тотемы, Тени и практики?»
Объясню разницу честно.
«Место Силы 11:11» - это живое пространство: эфиры, практики, разборы и сильное окружение.
Мы работаем с отдельными Тенями и частями личности, движемся за тем, что поднимается сейчас: отношения, …
Я ОДИН НЕ СПРАВЛЮСЬ
И это не про слабость.
Многие думают, что «Система Внутреннего Прайда» - просто трёхмесячное обучение: прошли уроки и разошлись.
❗️Но для меня это начало гораздо большей истории.
Годами я собирал Тотемы, Тени, Лики, роли, проявление, деньги и влияние.
Сейчас всё это впервые сложилось в систему, которая помогает не «чинить» себя, а понять:
- Из чего я собран? Где моя сила? Почему я способен н…
🜂 ОТКРЫТ НАБОР НА ОБУЧЕНИЕ «СИСТЕМА ВНУТРЕННЕГО ПРАЙДА» 🜂
Я подготовил для вас сильнейший путь перехода: в деньги, силу, уверенность и реализацию.
Отдельно хочу обратиться
к участникам клуба.
Если вам кажется, что в клубе вы уже получили всю Систему - это не так.
Клуб дал вам сильную базу: эфиры, практики, работу с Тенью, тотемами и отдельными частями метода.
Но обучение - это новая ступень знаний и практик.
З…
Спасибо большое, Тален!🔥🔥🔥
Во многом благодаря твоим эфирам позволил себе улететь в Бразилию.
Сейчас в долгой дороге, участвовать было сложно технически.
Как только будет стабильная связь, обязательно посмотрю!!!
Ты делаешь важное дело и семена твоих трудов прорастают во мне день ото дня!✊️🤓
❗️ЗАПИСЬ ЭФИРА «ТЕНЕВЫЕ ЛИЧНОСТИ 2.0»
Созданный специально под коридор затмений для перехода в новую ветку реальности
🔗Ссылка для просмотра- https://kinescope.io/rL6fKL3rcjc1rMPcZPqi73
😅ВЫ МЕНЯ УГОВОРИЛИ)
Эфир был настолько сильный, что я решил выложить запись на 32 часа в знак уважения к вам и вашим запросам. О чём был эфир?
Для любого перехода, требуется большой обьем психической энергии.. Это объясняется... П…
❤46👍9🙏8🥰6⚡3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @Y1_XgRaORZJkZjAy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Y1_XgRaORZJkZjAy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто завтра будет на эфире. Дайте знать пожалуйста 🤝
✅ Я буду96%
Пропущу. Следующий похожий цикл подожду лет 18 🫠4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TALEN” (@Y1_XgRaORZJkZjAy), 20,646 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Y1_XgRaORZJkZjAy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.