Channel
@XunhuaGKB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16,416subscribers
+201 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001573523197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XunhuaGKB |
| Description | 海量抽奖，自由沟通，尽在寻花群！ 主群： @Xunhua0731 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XunhuaGKB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 16,416 | +62 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 16,354 | +76 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 16,278 | +63 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 16,215 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
92 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 79 | 85.9% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 14.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #点点 【标签】#嫩妹 #态度车 #大蟒蛇 车牌： @Linlin1117 硬件条件：B 身高164，体重85，还没完全长开的小女孩身材，因为很介意自己的平胸所以做了隆胸。其实柳三劝过，但是没劝住，但是怎么说呢，毕竟自己开心才是最重要的吧。 性方面还是比较懵懵懂懂的，配合是挺配合的，但是有时候假叫床让人出戏，但有时候又敏感到失禁，我也搞不懂她，可能还是太小孩了吧。 课表及服务：B 三件套加上管保的大蟒蛇，其他会一点简单服务，虽然快感聊胜于无，但是做的一板一眼，颇有过家家的感觉。 定价600p900pp，价格适中。 特色：B 紧张的时候有点话痨，所以总是说个不停。她是那种完全不会察言观色的小孩子性格，所以有时候不能太往心里去，个性比较敏感的老哥就别去她那里了，容易被气死。 最终评级：B 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/994 柳三秒的报告
👎10👍4
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #苏萌 【标签】#少妇 #态度车 #浅吻 #六九 车牌： @sm223368 硬件条件：A 身高160，体重48kg，胸围D，特别注明是天然的。苏萌是瑜伽老师，形体是真的好看，胸大屁股翘的，而且气质也比一般的土少妇好得多。资料年龄写的25岁，应该是实打实的。 长相的话在老师里面也是第一梯队了吧，之前的上榜资料里有个视频应该算比较真实了，比较来看其他照片P得也不大。 课表及服务：A 有69，有简单的92服务，唯一的遗憾就是只有浅吻没有舌吻。从之前的报告来看，苏萌的口活这些也是量大管饱的，所以去了的都是好评。 定价上面，虽然是600p1100pp，但是p是50分钟，看看现在到处都是各种三件套也敢挂600甚至700的，这个单p的性价比还是很高的。 特色：A 情绪价值给的很足，性格也是那种很柔和的（有一种说法就是，真大胸的妹子，一般都是这种好性格，母性很足），这点去过的狼友普遍都这么认为。 最终评级…
👍5
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #静怡 【标签】#御姐 #态度车 #舌吻 #六九 车牌： @jingyi066 硬件条件：B 身高162，体重102，胸围B，硬件不算多亮眼，但是日感很好，下面的构造比较特别，洞口特别紧，这个没日过不知道，日过一次绝对难忘。 身材方面，静怡属于那种有肉但不显胖的身材，肉都长在了该长的地方，体脂率不高，除非是真的白幼瘦审美，静怡这样的身材是干起来很舒服的那种了。 课表及服务：B 三件套加上69和亲嘴，但一般都能蛇到，其他服务基本就没有了，但是属于相处非常舒服的那种。 定价500p900pp，价格适中。 特色：B 没有什么太多特点，可能最深的印象还是性格好，人很温柔，又大方实在，不玩那些花花肠子，直来直去。 最终评级：B 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4918 柳三秒的报告
👍4👎1
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #小夕 【标签】#御姐 #敏感型 #舌吻 #六九 车牌： @xiaoxi36457 硬件条件：A 身高163，体重45kg，胸围34c，是那种非常苗条但是有料的身材，两只小白兔的手感很不错，因为本身就偏瘦的身材，尤其显得很大。 照片磨皮美白了，真人是御姐的类型了，但是气质非常好，很像那种良家的真老师。 课表及服务：B 因为是良家下海的类型，服务基本上是不会的，但是有舌吻有69，这就够了。 定价5p9pp，还是挺值的。 特色：S 超级敏感的体质，干起来非常有满足感，做爱的时候很配合，而且全情投入，每次去体验都非常顶。 最终评级：A 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/1138 柳三秒的报告
👍2
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #思语 【标签】#御姐 #服务型 #炮架 #六九 车牌： @nvyouzhu333 硬件条件：A 身高170，体重108，胸围34C，有胸有屁股，炮架的类型，泼群确实老嫂子多一点，所以思语刚刚出道就嘎嘎乱杀，成了群内红牌。 照片只有艺术照，不过真人身材是对版的。 课表及服务：B 有部分92服务，做得也还算到位，此外还有个69，课表中规中矩。 定价7p11pp，一两年前这个价算偏贵，但如今长沙电报各种金逼横着走，倒显得不算那么贵了。 特色：A 相处很舒服的妹子，两度成为甲帝女主角，甲帝为了推思语也是费心了哈哈哈哈 最终评级：A 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/6357 甲帝拍的
👍3
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #奶芙芙 【标签】#嫩妹 #颜值车 #女友感 #六九 #亲嘴 车牌： @xxe568 硬件条件：A 身高165，体重92斤，胸围34B，属于那种还没完全成熟的少女身材，很苗条，不过该有肉的地方还是有肉的，下面天生入口紧，也会夹，日感很不错，技术也比一般的嫩妹好一点。 人照基本对版，颜值属于楼凤第一档了，只不过气质上反而偏御姐一些。 课表及服务：B 三件套加69，还可以亲嘴，服务的话就简单一点，但也不是敷衍的那种。 定价6p，没开pp，中规中矩吧。 特色：A 情商很高的妹子，也挺懂怎么哄男人的，虽然有一些小心思但不惹人烦，基本上还在可爱的范畴里。这个度挺难把握的，再多一点就显得油了。 最终评级：A 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/3384 柳三秒的报告
👍2
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #七月 【标签】#御姐 #服务型 #炮架 #舌吻 #六九 车牌： @qiyuemeimei 硬件条件：S 身高172，胸围36C，模特身材，见面让人眼前一亮，属于走大街上回头率都很高的类型。 妹子肯定是有健身习惯的，核心力量很强，有可以大战三百回合的体能储备，女上还能桩一会儿。 课表及服务：S 莞式服务，而且一招一式都是专业的，服务意识也特别好特别卖力，从见面聊天开始就如沐春风，抽空还吹吹彩虹屁，更是能把男人哄得飘飘欲仙。 定价6p9pp，个人觉得物超所值。 特色：A 能提供不错的情绪价值，相处非常舒服，课室安全性还很高。 最终评级：S 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4456 柳三秒的报告
👍6
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #米莎 【标签】#少女 #女友感 #美腿 #六九 车牌： @Semyo053 硬件条件：B 身高168，体重98，胸围36C，修长苗条的少女身材，属于是养眼也好日的身材。柳三去的时候她才刚刚下海，那时候就感觉她有点脆，不是很耐操的那种。桩一点的老哥就别去了，她应该扛不住。 课表及服务：B 嫩妹三件套加了个69，在去年远洋炮楼里出道的那一堆三件套妹子里，算是比较有诚意的了。 定价5p10pp，摆明了就是不想接pp了，建议去的话也只约个一水就行了，不折磨彼此。 特色：B 女友感挺强的，相处自然舒服。 最终评级：B 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4605 柳三秒的报告
👍4
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #蕊蕊 【标签】#嫩妹 #大长腿 #炮架 车牌： @ruirui_1122 硬件条件：A 身高168，体重110，胸围C，是那种发育不错的长腿妹，但是又有肉感，粗糙一点地说，日起来最舒服的那种炮架身材。 妹子夹技相当不错，夹得非常自然且舒服，不过好像不是太耐操的那种。 课表及服务：C 三件套，课表写的那些简单服务反正我没体验到，情绪价值也聊胜于无，不是很爱讲话的那种。 原来开6张的时候我不推荐任何人去，但是现在降价到5p8pp了，日感这么好的妹子值得去试一下。 特色：C 没什么太多特色的妹子 最终评级：C 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/1712 柳三秒的报告
👍2
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #仙人掌 【标签】#嫩妹 #可爱型 车牌： @xianrenzhang18 硬件条件：B 身高160，体重45kg，胸围36B，硬件上没有特别亮眼的地方，就是普通的小妹子，但是下面非常紧致，夹的时候半真半假，身体反应和技巧浑人天成，让人着迷。照片基本对版，主要是P图风格有点非主流。 课表及服务：B 三件套，但是因为妹子性格好，所以PP间隙的时候可以抱着聊天，女友感很强，情绪价值也给得很足，柳三去过几次，她从来不会偷玩手机。 价格是5p9pp，价格不错。 特色：S 可爱爆棚，该品类天花板，而且是自然的呆萌可爱，而不是装出来的那种，如果你吃这一款的话，她就是你的天命之女。 最终评级：A 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4797 柳三秒的报告
👍3
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #酱酱紫 【标签】#嫩妹 #态度车 #亲嘴 车牌： @hdkd235 硬件条件：B 身高162，体重45kg，胸围C，小巧玲珑型，但麻雀虽小五脏俱全，有胸有屁股。真人和照片基本一致，不过P图风格有点奇怪。 课表及服务：B 只能亲嘴，有部分92服务，服务意识很好，口活更是又久又耐心，技术也还不错。 价格是5p8pp，属于非常良心的定价。 特色：B 有良家女友感，个性温柔，属于难得那种绝对不会下头的那种嫩妹。 最终评级：B 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4756 柳三秒的报告
👍5
🌸🌸🌸长沙必吃榜🌸🌸🌸 #小玉儿 【标签】#嫩妹 #大蟒蛇 #六九 车牌： @yuer533 硬件条件：A 身高160，体重90斤，胸围36D，小只马的嫩妹，因为身材娇小所以罩杯惊人，脱了衣服有胸有屁股。 没化妆的情况下可能没那么精致，但是基本还算是对版的，缺点就是肤色不白。 课表及服务：A 有蛇有69，而且舌吻基本是大蟒蛇管饱，做的时候也配合，女上还能稍微桩一会儿。 定价是5p10pp，一水价格就挺好了，二水没必要，因为妹子本身是话很少那种，基本提供不了情绪价值。 特色：C 性格内向，基本上是个小哑巴。有些老哥本身也腼腆，可能就会觉得妹子冷漠不理人，这种就不适合去。 最终评级：B 相册及具体课表转跳至《长沙总榜》：https://t.me/fk0731/4587 柳三秒的报告
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XunhuaGKB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,235,766 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@XunhuaGKB named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“长沙必吃榜” (@XunhuaGKB), 16,416 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XunhuaGKB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.