Про меня

Channel
Анна Милюкова || семейный консультант
@XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,488subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001669665214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 2,488 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 2,489 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 2,495 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 2,506 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 2,513 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 2,516 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,522 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 2,523 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 2,526 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 2,529 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,535 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 2,543 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 2,550 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 2,550 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 62.6% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 18.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.32% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.60% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Про многих сестра, просто не каждая может осмелиться это признать…
🌿🌿🌿🌿 И тогда проблема уже не только в том, что делает муж. Возникает второй вопрос: «Почему я настолько эмоционально включена в отношения, которые происходят не со мной?»
❤2
Представьте: Муж поссорился с другой женой. Вы начинаете замечать его настроение. Он молчит — вы думаете, что случилось. Он раздражён — вы анализируете. Они помирились — вам тревожно. Они снова поссорились — вам спокойнее. Он к ней поехал — вам плохо. Он от неё приехал в хорошем настроении — вам снова нужно понять, почему. 💔 И постепенно получается очень странная вещь: ваше эмоциональное состояние начинает жить …
❤2
Начну с очевидного. Если мужчина поссорился с одной женой, это не означает, что он получает право быть несправедливо холодным, грубым или пренебрежительным с другой. Конфликт с одним человеком не даёт нам разрешения причинять боль другому. 🥀 🥀Но… если мы остановимся только на этом выводе, мы упустим самое важное.
❤2💯2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4
Эта история ⬇️
- Моя21%
- Не моя5%
- Даже слушать не хочу так триггерит11%
- Интересно послушать74%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Разбираем?
🌟Разве я должна страдать от того, что муж поссорился с другой женой? 🌟Почему его настроение на моей семье должно отражаться? 😡 ✨✨✨ Боль болючая многих, верно? С разрешения сестры разберу этот вопрос на канале ин ща Аллах. А вы пока поддержите ❤️❤️❤️
🔥2❤1
🌙 Мысль на ночь: Мы часто просим у Аллаха изменить обстоятельства. А Он меняет нас — чтобы обстоятельства перестали ломать.
❤5👍4💯1
Posted without readable text
❤3💯3🔥1
🔤еня мучает одна мысль... Честно. У меня есть столько информации, я будто бочка, которая вот вот рванет. И есть у меня такой недостаток: если я знаю, то кажется будто все знают. А потом когда в работе проговариваю, у большинства круглые глаза: «ааа, вот так это работает оказывается». 🕊Возвращаюсь к душемучительной мысли: как бы моя деятельность могла принести большему количеству сестер пользу? Я делала дуа и ответ …
❤8🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Эта история ⬇️
- Моя21%
- Не моя5%
- Даже слушать не хочу так триггерит11%
- Интересно послушать74%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Для меня счастье👇
- Крепкая семья и любящий муж.53%
- Финансовая свобода и достаток.21%
- Здоровье – свое и близких.29%
- Внутренний покой близость к Аллаху.66%
- Реализация, дело жизни.18%
- Напишу свое в комментариях.0%
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sanochkina_anna · 24,789
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Милюкова || семейный консультант” (@XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy), 2,488 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XuHyWeeo9klmOGUy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.