Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 28 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,121–1,140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 00:17
1,123
-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:57
1,124
-1
20 Oct 2026, 09:39
1,125
-3
16 Oct 2026, 23:35
1,128
-2
13 Oct 2026, 23:57
1,130
-5
8 Oct 2026, 15:14
1,135
-3
4 Oct 2026, 15:22
1,138
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 43s
Average length
2m 13s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,649 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,522
41.7%
👍
1,331
36.5%
👏
354
9.70%
🤬
144
3.95%
😡
79
2.16%
💯
72
1.97%
😁
41
1.12%
🥰
17
0.466%
🤔
16
0.438%
🙏
15
0.411%
🏆
10
0.274%
😱
8
0.219%
🔥
7
0.192%
😢
7
0.192%
❤🔥
6
0.164%
🤝
3
0.082%
🥴
3
0.082%
👌
2
0.055%
🕊
2
0.055%
😍
2
0.055%
6 further kinds
8
0.219%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,649 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2024 to 12 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Se confirma: hubo elección de Estado.
El TEPJF reconoce que el Presidente violó abiertamente la ley y utilizó los programas sociales para coaccionar el voto.
Lamentablemente seguirá impune y no tendrá consecuencias.
Nunca hubo piso parejo.
Desde nuestras trincheras, seguimos defendiendo a los candidatos de la oposición que ganaron en sus municipios y ahora enfrentan intentos de despojo electoral.
Es vital hacer valer la democracia y respetar la voluntad del pueblo. No vamos a permitir que se nos arrebate este triunfo.
La popularidad no debe sustituir al mérito.
Lo digo fuerte y claro y que se escuche hasta Palacio Nacional: la experiencia no es igual a corrupción.
Por eso, no estoy de acuerdo en que se elijan por voto popular a ministros de la SCJN, ni a los jueces y magistrados de la Federación.
No caigamos en la trampa de que Morena va a escuchar posibles procedimientos que garanticen la capacidad y profesionalismo de los perfiles que busquen formar parte del Poder Judicial.
Se los digo por experiencia. Como senadora fui testigo de cómo votaron perfiles sin experiencia y con clara militancia o simpatía partidista.
Ejemplos hay de sobra: Ministras de la SCJN, integrantes de la Comisión Reguladora de Energí…
Señor Presidente, le tomo la palabra.
Si en verdad está de acuerdo en que cualquier Presidente que intervenga en una elección sea sancionado por traición a la patria, pídale a los legisladores de Morena y sus aliados que aprueben la iniciativa que presenté ayer.
https://x.com/politicomx/status/1806336853575868861?s=48&t=hPuc_VSj__YriK5fyQSSxg
El Presidente López Obrador intervino a todas luces en el proceso electoral para favorecer a Morena y sus candidaturas.
Por eso presenté una reforma al Código Penal para tipificar y sancionar como traición a la patria las conductas del titular del Poder Ejecutivo Federal, cuando éstas violen la ley electoral.
Nunca más una elección de Estado. Es momento de hacer valer los principios de imparcialidad y neutralidad e…
No se confunda, secretaria Rosa Icela no se trata de campañas en su contra.
Al menos 35 aspirantes a cargos de elección fueron asesinados en este proceso electoral. Efectivamente, no llegaron a ser candidatos porque los mataron antes de registrarse en la contienda.
No intenten lavarse las manos.
Ustedes siempre tienen otros datos.
Todo violentador político de mujeres es multado por el TEPJF y obligado a tomar un curso de violencia política de género, ¿por qué el Presidente no?
Por eso le envío a López Obrador material para que asuma su responsabilidad.
❤97👍51👏11🏆2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XochitlGalvezMexico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
López-Dóriga Digital @LopezDorigaCom · 18,757 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xóchitl Gálvez” (@XochitlGalvezMexico), 1,123 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XochitlGalvezMexico.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.