⚡️Trust is hard to verify in #Crypto. Fake identities. Noisy credentials. Unclear reputation. Xnect Verified Badges make real signals easier to recognize. ✅ Verified identities ✅ Trusted communities ✅ Credible achievements Trust should be visible. https://xnect.me/badgelist Full post: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2079455898372919420

Channel
Xnect Ann
@Xnect_announcement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,258subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002592556761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xnect_announcement |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xnect_announcement |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 3,258 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 3,263 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 3,271 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 3,273 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.46%
- avg views ÷ 3,258 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 December 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 15 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🫨 While most people just search "Robinhood Chain", the smart ones track the right people. We have just launched the "Robinhood Chain" label on Xnect — Insider-driven research & early signals via key accounts like @RobinhoodCrypto (on X) and more.✅ Follow the moves that actually matter. ⚡️ Available now: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2077679001557168218
⚡️ Finding the right people and projects on X shouldn’t feel like endless scrolling. That’s why we built Xnect. With Labels and Badges, Xnect turns scattered profiles, teams, and projects into structured, discoverable digital identity. ✅ Looking for Web3 jobs or hiring? Start with the “Recruitment Firm” label: https://xnect.me/badges?tagid=57cf6f70-0dc2-4954-aecf-ffd568b5051a ✅ Want to reach the official Binance t…
🤖 We created the "Agent Survival Pack" label on Xnect! 6 @BNBCHAIN infrastructure projects for AI Agents — gas, inference, APIs, routing — all in one label.🙌 This label will keep growing. Full post: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2069696935163043906
👀 We've added all the Binance service colleagues listed in this post under the "Binance" Badge! Everyone can now easily discover and connect with the right team members all in one place.✅ 🔍 Find them here: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2066790170490482751 Original post: https://x.com/sisibinance/status/2066439338876166431
🦋 Power Your Web3 Hiring with Precision Xnect @BNBCHAIN is hiring across engineering, marketing, BD & more! 🔥 Looking to help fill these roles — or competing for the same talent? On Xnect, you can find professional recruitment firms specializing in crypto/Web3 executive search — all verified under the 'Recruitment Firm' Label. 🔍 Discover them here: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2066358747702989195
Excited to welcome @dgrid_ai to Xnect 🥳 DGrid is now using the Xnect Badge feature to make its official team accounts easier to verify on X — helping the community identify authentic profiles with more confidence.🌟 👇Check out the full list: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2053745279141032414
We created the "AI Agent" label on Xnect🤖 AI Agent projects, all in one place — no more hunting them down one by one. This label will keep growing. If you're building an AI Agent project or know one worth tracking — let us know 👇 🔗Explore the list: https://xnect.me/badges?tagid=973897ca-551b-45e7-a422-1f6556fbf671
⚡️@BNBCHAIN dropped its AI Landscape 🤖 We curated every project mentioned into one label — "BNBChain AI Landscape" One link. All BNB x AI projects. No more scrolling through threads. 👇Explore the full list: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2049765449798434982
🔥 In a sea of AI hype, some voices actually matter. 'AI Notables' on Xnect — a curated, ever-expanding badge for the builders, researchers, and leaders shaping the AI landscape.🫡 See who’s who, right on their X profile. One click, one extension. 🔗Meet the list (always growing): https://x.com/X_nect/status/2037469049701982701
🤔Need to track a transaction? Or monitor an entire network? 'Block Explorer' label on Xnect puts the essential on-chain gateways in one place. Follow them all, instantly. 🔗Full list here: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2047230040128020639
Data doesn't lie. But you have to know where to look. 📊 Introducing 'Data & Analysis' label on Xnect — a curated label featuring the leading dashboards and analytics platforms on X. Follow the numbers. Track the sources. All in one click. 🔗 Explore the full list: https://x.com/X_nect/status/2032012469246287925
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Xnect_announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xnect Ann” (@Xnect_announcement), 3,258 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xnect_announcement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.