Channel
@Xiaohui_123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,482subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003948206199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xiaohui_123 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xiaohui_123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 1,482 | +29 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 1,453 | +13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 1,440 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 1,435 | +18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 1,417 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 1,417 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,034 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎟 抽奖标题: ❤️沪上嫩妹甄选府《浦东 小慧》【@xiaohui_01】❤️ 本次活动由【沪上嫩妹甄选府】倾情赞助！ 1️⃣本次活动将开启无限加成模式！叠加次数越多，中奖几率越大 2️⃣请24小时内联系老师兑换，3天内出击完成提交报告因炸号，退群，注销账号等原因，超时未兑换等原因的，不予兑奖！ 3️⃣活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 ⚠️刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、删除消息、撤回内容等，一律视为无效发言，取消中奖资格！请用心交流！ 兑奖请联系：@xiaohui_01 消耗积分: 50 积分 定时开奖 2026-09-07 15:00:00 参与关键词: 府有佳人三千，独宠小慧一天 已参与: 22人 🎁 奖品列表： 单P6折优惠券 X 1 「乐透抽奖」 每消耗 50 积分 兑换一张乐透券 🎟 可多次参与抽奖提高中奖率 🎉 参与要求: ➕加入 - 小慧同学的频道🦄 ➕加入 - 【上海】沪…
好奇！那些要约课的哥哥哎
可以上课了哦！
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
可以上班了要约的哥哥快点哦！
地陪业务没有一个啊
哥哥们可以约课了！ 小慧上班了！
最近不舒服！养身体！可以约地陪哦
我是安全慧！每天都检查！
Photo, posted without a caption
【验证时间】：2026-08-21 【联系老师】：@xiaohui_01 【老师艺名】：小慧同学 【验证留名】：波吉·J 【颜值评分】：9 【人照评分】：9 【身材评分】：9.5 【科室环境】：9 【服务评分】：8.8 【态度评分】：9 【出击金额】：1800pp 【推荐指数】：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 【约课记录】： 【服务过程】复刷小慧，又一次三十多公里的出击，约上了小慧的头课。 课室是浦东沿街的老小区，上下方便，停车有点麻烦。 开始以为是在小区里面找了一会儿，然后遥控上楼，门一打开小慧鬼头鬼脑的探着头。和我说：其实挺好找的，快进来吧。 课室不大，还挺整洁，第一眼就看到了她穿着白色吊带牛仔短裤，小慧这家伙，好像又变大了。 随后我自然的在沙发坐下，小慧对比第一次相见少了一些局促和尴尬。才发现她也是个小话痨，她来到沙发坐我旁边，和我说了好多，还给我展示七夕节点外卖附赠的玫瑰，看得出还是小女孩心思。 一边聊天一边给小慧简单检查一下身体，也是聊的…
❤2
起床了可以约哦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Xiaohui_123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小慧同学的频道🦄” (@Xiaohui_123), 1,482 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xiaohui_123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.