Channel
@XiamenWanglin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,419subscribers
+50 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003574637103 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XiamenWanglin |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XiamenWanglin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 2,419 | +33 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 2,386 | +17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:30 | 2,369 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (24 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,855 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2026.9.# 日志2 出击汤圆，出门偶遇的邻家妹妹一样，毫无风尘气。人照几乎一模一样，如果觉得照片好看去了就不会失望，颜值上等，非常清纯。身高160左右，体重不到90，胸A+，很坚挺，手感很好，细腰大屁股，身材很不错。皮肤白嫩滑，没有纹身，三点还算粉。态度非常好，女友感比较高，每天接得很少，身体很敏感，前戏亲亲摸摸就湿了一片，嘟感很好，非常紧，可以一直亲，但是不能🐍。 综合评价：清纯系颜值嫩妹，可惜不能🐍，不然情绪价值就拉满了，嘟感很好，乖巧配合，综合评分9.6分，给到顶级。
❤1
2026.9.# 日志 出击柠柠，高个嫩妹。照片原相机出的，人照10分，真人看着自然好看一点。身高大约165，体重90左右，胸B，看着挺，摸着软，细腰大屁股，后入炮架非常养眼。皮肤略有点黑，只有轻微纹身，三点不粉。态度非常好，可以愉快聊天，姿势配合，口活慢条斯理，可以一直🐍，没异味，做的时候反馈也很好，和泡泡有点像。 综合评价：刚下的嫩妹，乖巧配合，很听指挥，炮架身材。缺点就是皮肤略黑。综合评分9.5分，给到顶级。
8月有点沉寂，不过基本上比较🔥的都去了，绝版顶中顶彤彤，超佛系乖妹尔尔，宛如瑶瑶两逗逼姐妹，反差拉满的泡泡，还有羊村三幻神前二，嫩到出水的呆妹和喵小糯，高挑炮架桃酥，也算各具特色，有四个给到夯，算是平均质量最高的一个月了。 彤彤除外，在尔尔，瑶瑶和泡泡间经过艰难的内心os，最喜欢的新人还是瑶瑶，乖到让人心疼的妹子，双飞全程积极主动，单飞也是服务全能，泡面家小小的平替，除了纹身外没有缺点。个人心中8月最佳新人。
2026.8.# 日志2 瑶瑶单独写一下，第一次出击瑶瑶时是晚上，排我前面的大名鼎鼎的桩机界三幻神，到我的时候瑶瑶已经风雨飘摇的状态了，尽管她尽力做好了服务，但体验确实打了折扣。在此奉劝诸位，珍爱生命，绕道养乐多。 故事紧接上回，闺蜜双飞完意犹未尽，立马再约瑶瑶，满血的瑶瑶，极品嫩妹。人照9.5分，长得非常甜美可爱，化妆也化得很精致。身高155左右，体重不到80，胸A➕，一手握住刚好，细腰翘臀。黄白皮肤，光滑细腻，单臂单腿纹身，三点非常粉。情绪价值拉满，无论是双飞还是后面的单飞，配合度都非常高，各种细节都很舒适，最后洗完澡还温柔的帮忙擦拭，乖巧得让人心疼。 综合评价：如果你因为错过了小小而惋惜，再错过瑶瑶就是活该了。乖巧可爱女友感爆棚的瑶瑶，除了纹身外没缺点，综合评分9.9分，给到夯！
❤3
2026.8.# 日志 闺蜜双飞瑶瑶宛如，刚好两个都熟悉。二人刚组的队，可能刚好我是熟人，气氛比较轻松。简单寒暄洗澡，三人挤一个小浴室，搂着宛如边亲边摸，瑶瑶在侧帮洗。洗完坐床边，瑶瑶帮口，搂着宛如啃，双重刺激下差点被秒了，赶紧戴套开干。二人挨着躺着，先从宛如开始，插着宛如🐍着瑶瑶，手也没停着，爱抚到瑶瑶也湿了。接着换插瑶瑶，拉着宛如三人🐍吻，差点笑场，就第一次来说这个配合度已经很高了。抠着宛如看她扭动着身体，翻身后入宛如，手搂着瑶瑶的细腰抚着翘臀，瑶瑶配合的大蟒🐍和舔胸，实在太享受了，进门第13分钟就被秒了。眼看时间充裕，左拥右抱休息了二十分钟，宛如后面有课先走了，临走再三人相拥了一会，上下其手，左右轮番🐍，一下又来反应了，问了一下瑶瑶还有时间，二人相视一笑。 先总结一下闺蜜双飞：宛如非常紧，一线天准白虎，包裹感十足，后入更是紧得鸡鸡生疼，但宛如比较害羞，不如瑶瑶主动热情。瑶瑶堪称六边形战士，除了纹身外，没有缺点，双飞结束立马…
❤1
2026.8.# 日志 出击喵小糯，确实刚下水的嫩妹，妹子说前天刚破的处，我一般不信这个，不过敢这么说的说明很紧。颜值方面，人照9分左右，颜值中等偏上一点点，胜在可爱，满满胶原蛋白，非常幼态。身材方面，身高160+，体重90左右，胸A+，还没怎么发育，屁股挺大，肉肉的，没有游泳圈。皮肤方面，黄白皮，没有纹身，光滑细腻，三点非常粉。服务方面，非常娇羞的大蟒🐍，因为生疏反而别有一番滋味，口活没试，非常乖巧配合，脸上一直挂着甜美的笑容。缺点是身材曲线一般，可能是还没发育吧。 综合评价：刚下水，非常嫩，乖巧配合，综合评分9.5分，给到顶级。
❤2
2026.8.# 日志 出击桃酥，高挑嫩妹。身高174，体重100，胸C都没有水分，非常高，看着比我还高。颜值方面，人照9分吧，妆容有差，颜值中等偏上。身材方面，顶级，坚挺的大C，细腰大屁股，纯天然优质炮架。皮肤非常白，没有纹身，手臂有疤，其他地方都很光滑，三点非常粉。态度方面，乖巧，刚下海不久，比较拘谨，放不大开，但是聊开之后还是挺爱笑的，姿势配合，大蟒蛇🐍到饱。 综合评价：高挑丰满，皮肤白皙，穿上高跟鞋绝杀，综合评分9.5，给到顶级！
❤2
2026.8.# 贤者有感： 麻子漂泊半生，只恨未逢明主，若召小蛋糕，愿拜为义父
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @XiamenWanglin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“wanglin的修炼日志🌸” (@XiamenWanglin), 2,419 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XiamenWanglin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.