Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2,126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103,843–106,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:57
104,162
-260
13 Aug 2026, 06:57
104,422
-132
12 Aug 2026, 07:02
104,554
-229
11 Aug 2026, 04:36
104,783
-323
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
105,106
-225
9 Aug 2026, 08:03
105,331
-193
8 Aug 2026, 09:10
105,524
-363
7 Aug 2026, 07:05
105,887
-401
6 Aug 2026, 08:31
106,288
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 104,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,500
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
23 (9 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
92,870
Reactions total
1,446
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Videos
5
Links
36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,784 reactions across 20 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
9,499
38.3%
🖕
3,037
12.3%
🤣
2,125
8.57%
🔥
2,116
8.54%
👍
2,082
8.40%
💩
1,529
6.17%
👎
1,382
5.58%
🤡
979
3.95%
😁
663
2.68%
🤬
248
1.00%
👌
154
0.621%
🥱
128
0.516%
👏
121
0.488%
🥰
108
0.436%
😭
79
0.319%
🙏
76
0.307%
💯
67
0.27%
🫡
44
0.178%
🎉
35
0.141%
🤔
33
0.133%
22 further kinds
279
1.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,977reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Temporary Suspension of Vault Deposits/Withdrawals and Upgrade to Vault V2
We would like to share an important notice with all Vault service users.
1. Temporary Suspension of Vault Deposits/Withdrawals and Upgrade to V2
- Deposits and withdrawals for Vault will be temporarily suspended sometime tomorrow (August 11)
- After the suspension, Vault will be upgraded to Vault V2.
2. Claim Guide for Existing Withdrawal …
XAX VAULT Migration Scheduled
XAX VAULT is scheduled to migrate to XAX V2 in the future in order to accommodate the
Xeffy_io APP integration update and security-related feedback from CertiK
Users currently staking in XAX VAULT do not need to take any additional action, as the V2 migration will proceed automatically!
https://x.com/xaxtrading/status/2085647711135760791
CertiK's overall security score for Xeffy has been made public.
It achieved a security score of A by obtaining a score of 80 or higher.
Please check the detailed internal data and scores on the CertiK website.
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2085314749525623132
The security audit results of XAX VAULT, carried out in collaboration with Certik have been released
Skynet-related scores will also be released soon You can safely use XAX VAULT
Check the report
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2084471200055759200
Xeffy ($Xef) has been listed on CoinMarketCap. 🔥
From now on, you can check Xef-related information through CoinMarketCap.
The Xeffy team is currently working hard to integrate Xeffy with many crypto infrastructures ahead of the upcoming major update!
Keep an eye on Xeffy.
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2080647379272028516
All is going smoothly with the construction.
Many things will be revealed in the massive update arriving soon.
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2079049734388650282
**XAX Vault Boosting Event Reminder**
https://xax.trading
There are 10 days left until the winner announcement.
Enjoy 19% returns and additional rewards!
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2077044971866341415
Xphere Content Challenge Event is just D-2 away!!
You can join the event by posting Xeffy content within the Xphere ecosystem!!
EVENT GOOGLE FORM
Create awesome content about Xphere and Xeffy and win prizes!!
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2073826186300703077
The distribution of Xeffy's first airdrop incentives has been completed. 🎉
1.5% of Xef's total supply (90 million tokens) has been distributed for this community incentive.
The distribution was made considering product usage, contributions to project content, campaign participation, and other related activities
Additionally, Season 2 will start right away!
Please keep participating!
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status…
Xeffy 1st Community Incentive Airdrop is scheduled to be executed within the next 2 hours. 🔥
UTC: July 3, 2026, 12:00 PM (12:00 UTC)
Please add the Xphere network according to the information below.
https://x.com/Xeffy_io/status/2072993655393317182
Incentive Airdrop UpdateThe first incentive community airdrop has not yet been conducted!!
We apologize for the delay, as the staking site renewal and Sybil process have not been completed yet.
We plan to proceed with the airdrop within the next 48 hours at the latest, and we are currently taking measures to ensure it can be carried out reliably.
We apologize once again for the delay.
👎1,020❤696🤡311🤣286🖕181💩176🤬94😭58
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Xeffy_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 574,550 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Xeffy_Official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pixie_pocket_ named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xeffy Announcement” (@Xeffy_Official), 104,162 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xeffy_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.