Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хайрли Тонг 💐 Xayrli Tong

Channel

Хайрли Тонг 💐 Xayrli Tong

@XayrliKunlar

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30,683subscribers

-173 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467442952
TypeChannel
Username@XayrliKunlar
DescriptionАссалому алейкум Бу ерда сиз кунлик табриклардан бахраманд бўласиз🌸☺️ Биздан узоқлашманг🤗 Реклама учун:👉 @Tabobatadmin
Created2 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/XayrliKunlar

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@XayrliKunlar/13282 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 23:27 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/1012627 Jul 2026, 23:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@XayrliKunlar/13283 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/1012728 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@XayrliKunlar/13284 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 23:19 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/1012928 Jul 2026, 23:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@XayrliKunlar/13286 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/1013230 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@XayrliKunlar/13288 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 23:29 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/1013530 Jul 2026, 23:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@XayrliKunlar/13296 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC@juma_tabriklari_muborak/101473 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@juma_tabriklari_muborak18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@juma_tabriklari_muborak (171)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @juma_tabriklari_muborak. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far above this size band

61,600 average views per post against 30,683 subscribers — an engagement rate of 200.8%. Across the 540 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,011–31,543 subscribers, posting mainly in Belarusian — the middle half sit between 7.33% and 25.8%, with a median of 15.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured62 of 62 published in the window (0 exact, 62 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,819,230
Mature posts only210.9% over 56 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers30,683 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:bel · 540 channels · p10 3.29% · p25 7.33% · p50 15.2% · p75 25.8% · p90 41.2%
Position in cohort99.814th percentile · 13.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.095% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageBelarusian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

30,68330,85630,769.56 August 2026 — 30,856 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,856 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,840 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,850 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,845 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,832 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,824 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,818 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,800 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,760 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,747 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,715 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,720 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,739 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,752 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,726 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,725 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,711 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,705 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,715 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,774 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,775 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,762 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,755 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,739 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,731 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,797 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,753 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,714 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,740 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,735 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,712 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,683 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,657–30,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:0130,683-29
15 Sept 2026, 14:3830,712-23
14 Sept 2026, 02:1530,735-5
12 Sept 2026, 05:5630,740+26
10 Sept 2026, 03:0030,714-39
6 Sept 2026, 17:4130,753-44
4 Sept 2026, 06:1930,797+66
2 Sept 2026, 17:1530,731-8
1 Sept 2026, 15:5630,739-16
31 Aug 2026, 13:3430,755-7
30 Aug 2026, 12:0430,762-13
29 Aug 2026, 10:3430,775+1
28 Aug 2026, 09:0330,774+59
27 Aug 2026, 08:4530,715+10
26 Aug 2026, 10:2730,705-6
25 Aug 2026, 12:3730,711-14
24 Aug 2026, 15:3330,725-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:5930,726-32
21 Aug 2026, 10:3430,758+6
20 Aug 2026, 10:5330,752first reading

Engagement

125 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
200.8%
avg views ÷ 30,683 subscribers
Avg views / post
61,600
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
62
of 125 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held125 (27 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total3,819,230
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,330
Videos
7,910
Links
7,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 51s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 119 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC≈47,100 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

ХАЙРЛИ ТОНГ! ⛅️ Ассалому алайкум! Сешанба тонги муборак бўлсин Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва барокатли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! Соғ–саломат уйғотган Роббимизга ҳамдлар бўлсин 🤲👇 ❗️Яқинларга Ҳам Улашинг 👉🏼 @XayrliKunlar

22 Sept 2026, 00:03 UTC≈49,900 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Хайрли_тонг 🌤 Aссалому алайкум. Сешанба тонги муборак бўлсин. ⚡️Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва барокатли бўлсин. Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! 👉 @XayrliKunlar

21 Sept 2026, 01:34 UTC≈36,500 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#ХАЙРЛИ_ТОНГ ☀️ 🌸 Aссалому алайкум. Душанба тонги муборак бўлсин 😊 Бошланган янги кун барчага баракали келсин! ❗️Яқинларга Ҳам Улашинг 👉 @Xayrlikunlar Уланинг☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

20 Sept 2026, 23:59 UTC≈72,400 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Хайрли_тонг Ассалому алайкум! Душанба тонги муборак бўлсин! Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва баракотли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! 😊 Дуоларингиз ижобат, ниятларингиз амалга ошсин! Юзингиздан табассум, қалбингиздан эзгулик аримасин! @Xayrlikunlar ☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

20 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC≈40,000 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Хайрли_тонг 🌤🌹 Ассалому алайкум! Якшанба тонги муборак бўлсин! Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва баракотли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин! 😊 ✨Дуоларингиз ижобат, ниятларингиз амалга ошсин! Юзингиздан табассум, қалбингиздан эзгулик аримасин! 👉 @XayrliKunlar

19 Sept 2026, 23:44 UTC≈58,100 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

☀️ Aссалому алайкум. Якшанба тонги муборак бўлсин. ✨Асл саодат нафас олиб турган ҳар онимизга шукр қила олишдир... ✨Шукр ва зикрга бой кун бўлсин! Дам олиш кунингиз мазмунли ўтсин! 👉 @Xayrlikunlar Уланинг☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

19 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC≈45,800 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

🌱Aссалому алайкум. Шанба тонги муборак бўлсин 😊👍 Соғ–саломат уйғотган Роббимизга хамдлар бўлсин! 🍃Асл саодат нафас олиб турган ҳар онимизга шукр қила олишдир... 🍃Шукр ва зикрга бой кун бўлсин! 🌱Кунингиз мазмунли ўтсин! 👉 @Xayrlikunlar Уланинг☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

18 Sept 2026, 23:49 UTC≈61,600 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#ХАЙРЛИ_ТОНГ ☀️ 🌱 Aссалому алайкум. Бугунги Шанба тонги барчамиз учун хайрли бўлсин 😊 Соғ–саломат уйғотган Роббимизга ҳамдлар бўлсин! Бошланган янги кун барчага омадли келсин! 👉 @XayrliKunlar

18 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC≈70,300 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Жума_муборак 🌙✨АССАЛОМУ АЛАЙКУМ Жума айёми муборак бўлсин ҚАДРДОНЛАРИМ! ✨Азиз диндошим Жуманинг файзи ва барокати сизга бўлсин 🌙 Кунларнинг саййиди, Ҳажжул масокин бўлган Жума ҳайр ва баракага тўла бўлсин! 👉 @Xayrlikunlar Уланинг☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

17 Sept 2026, 23:59 UTC≈90,100 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Жума_муборак 🕋 Ассалому алайкум! Жума айёмингиз муборак бўлсин қадрдоним! 🕌 Улуғ кунда сўранг не бўлса керак! 🕌 Нолаларингиз йиғади фалак. 🕌 Аллоҳ рози бўлсин сиздан диндошим, 🕌 Жума айёмингиз бўлсин муборак! Хар бир қилган ибодатингиз қабул бўлсин, Илоҳим! 🤲 📨 Яқинларни биринчи бўлиб табрикланг! 👉 @Xayrlikunlar

17 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC≈54,100 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Жума_муборак ✨Азиз диндошим муборак Жуманинг файзи барокати сизга бўлсин 🌛 Энг яқин инсоним кириб келган “Жума” куни муборак бўлсин. ♾ ЯҚИНЛАРИНГИЗНИ БИРИНЧИЛАРДАН БЎЛИБ ТАБРИКЛАНГ 👉🏼 @XayrliKunlar

17 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC≈54,700 viewsread 22 September 2026
Video

#Хайрли_тонг 🌱Ассалому алайкум! Пайшанба тонги муборак бўлсин! Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва барокатли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият тарк этмасин🤲 Яқинларни янги тонг билан табрикланг. @Xayrlikunlar ☑️ 👉 https://t.me/joinchat/bqb1CGbAzuM4OWEy

Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @XayrliKunlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хайрли Тонг 💐 Xayrli Tong” (@XayrliKunlar), 30,683 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XayrliKunlar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.