Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@᮫꒰͜͡ :₊𖥔 ⵋᗣᐯᖗᙓᖇ! ۪ ׄ໑୧ ׅ𖥔ׄ

@XavierTrope_diary2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003719746521
TypeChannel
Username@XavierTrope_diary2
Descriptionㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ۪ ׄ໑୧𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 : https://t.me/x1yden1 ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ᶦᶰᶠᵒ: https://t.me/InfoKrots ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ ᩘ𓏵 . .ᵃʳᶜʰᶦᵛᵉ : https://t.me/Arcivesdv
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 11 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/XavierTrope_diary2

Growth

267 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:1626no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3726first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54296346613179082401627.1%
custom 54292895392208323051322.0%
custom 5399828709270110330813.6%
custom 5429203403651711607813.6%
custom 542961507626703737258.47%
custom 545175669782980545146.78%
custom 537748391857437109335.08%
custom 545192708347740664523.39%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XavierTrope_diary2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 March 2026 to 22 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 17:43 UTC78 viewsread 11 August 2026

Кстати какой цвет хотите пишите под этот коммент

22 Apr 2026, 17:37 UTC81 viewsread 11 August 2026

Газуй нащуй это тип все щас делать

22 Apr 2026, 17:16 UTC102 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Писать пост и завтра делать переоформление

  1. Газуй нахуй80%
  2. Нет лучше все завтра33%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Apr 2026, 17:15 UTC86 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ну блять все у меня настроение есть хочу писать пост

22 Apr 2026, 17:13 UTC83 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я решил дать новое дыхание дневнику кто у меня был в кн отметьтесь пожалуйста

15 Mar 2026, 12:33 UTC246 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

— что.. Ты серьёзно — Ксавье подошел ближе, кисть в его руке была зажата как кинжал. — Ты — Хайд. Ты — кошмар. Я рисовал тебя месяцами, Тайлер. Я видел тебя во снах еще до того, как узнал кто ты . Мои сны всегда предупреждали меня об опасности, но я был слишком глуп, слишком одинок, чтобы понять: мой самый большой страх и мое самое сильное... Он запнулся, не желая произносить это слово. — Твое самое сильное что, К

custom 54296346613179082407custom 54292034036517116073custom 54292895392208323053custom 53774839185743710932custom 54517566978298054512custom 54296150762670373721

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @XavierTrope_diary2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Apr 2026, 17:16 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Писать пост и завтра делать переоформление

  1. Газуй нахуй80%
  2. Нет лучше все завтра33%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 22 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 986,348 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@᮫꒰͜͡ :₊𖥔 ⵋᗣᐯᖗᙓᖇ! ۪ ׄ໑୧ ׅ𖥔ׄ” (@XavierTrope_diary2), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XavierTrope_diary2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.