Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Хard Money

@XardMoney

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,891subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720200092
TypeChannel
Username@XardMoney
DescriptionЭкосистема: @XardDegen | @XardCode | XardAmba По всем вопросам: @Ehsbeu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/XardMoney

Growth

4,8914,9024,896.57 August 2026 — 4,902 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,891 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,889–4,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:134,891-11
7 Aug 2026, 06:264,902no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:454,902first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 4,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 September 20257 August 2026)
Views total2,602
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
236
Videos
17
Links
245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,438 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆33723.4%
31121.6%
🔥27519.1%
👍24717.2%
custom 52538383943074126471228.48%
custom 5253875635968835353886.12%
302.09%
🐳281.95%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,438reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
325
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 19 we hold a reading for · 84%
Most on one post
123
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XardMoney. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 September 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC882 views70 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Зачем зарабатывать, если оно не так? 🤩

🏆4420👍6

27 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,720 views48 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🏆2910🔥9

2 Jun 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,600 views50 reactions84 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Купил TON пару дней назад по 1.73$. А еще вынес проект на ляяяяяяяяям двести, а еще… крч пост читай. Как то хорошо заладилось у меня с тончиком. В прошлый раз купил его за день до пампа, заработал кучу денег. В этот раз купил за день до пампа, тоже заработал. Хорошее подтверждение тому, что стоит инвестировать в те активы, которые тебе самому интересны. По базе для безопасности как будто хочется купить ETH и держат

👍27🏆10🔥9🐳211

28 Mar 2026, 14:38 UTC≈3,240 views40 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

lifemaxxxing или как прожить жизнь на полную? «Если на каждый заданный вопрос ты пытаешься найти правильный ответ, то вся твоя жизнь это экзамен. В какой момент в школе у тебя больше всего стресса и тревоги? – на экзамене. Я не пытаюсь найти правильный ответ, я отвечаю то, что я чувствую» Kanye West Всегда нужно помнить, что второго шанса не будет. Не будет еще одной жизни, которую ты сможешь прожить так, как ты за

🏆2585🐳2

9 Mar 2026, 18:29 UTC≈3,070 views47 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @XardDegenPhoto

Всем ку! Сегодня у меня день рождения, 23 исполнилось. Счастлив, доволен жизнью, благодарен Богу! Сорри, еще никому не отвечал, весь день в делах! Полный газ, короче 😘

🏆2611custom 52538383943074126479🐳1

29 Jan 2026, 11:25 UTC≈4,820 views41 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Помните портфель на 100к$, который я собирал 4 месяца назад? Можете смело забыть. -67%, из 100.000$ осталось 34.200$. Так что же произошло? А ничего особенного, рынок нагрел очередного гойчика (хоть я и еврей) на кучу тысяч. Обидно, досадно, ожидаемо. И так будет с каждым. С каждым, кто надеется, что своими силами и своим умом выйдет что-то заработать. Еще раз повторю – ТАК БУДЕТ С КАЖДЫМ. Рынок создан для того, чт

22custom 52538383943074126478🏆7👍3🐳1

19 Jan 2026, 11:38 UTC≈3,280 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2025 прошел результатов не будет. Планов на 2026 тоже. Честно – вообще не хочется писать банальный спич о том, что этот год был тяжелый, но вот в новом году мы обязательно покажем и бла бла бла. Если ты ничего не делал в 25 году, то шансов, что ты начнешь что-то делать в 26 – ничтожно мало. Это не вопрос усилий, потенциала и времени. Это вопрос решения. Пора прекращать думать о том какой у тебя невероятный потенци

🏆21custom 52538383943074126471181🐳1

12 Dec 2025, 09:23 UTC≈3,420 views34 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

Решено, FCFS не будет. Глупо метать бисер перед свиньями, так же глупо давать инвайты самым шустрым. Здесь ценна не скорость, а готовность и заинтересованность. Я не просил, но ребята уже организовались и начали под прошлым постом писать почему именно они должны получить инвайт, здесь мы продолжим. Хочешь инвайт – напиши зачем он тебе, насколько активно ты планируешь торговать вообще что угодно, свой бекграунд, ка

🏆15🔥7🐳64👍2

11 Dec 2025, 15:54 UTC≈3,200 views78 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Щас читай внимательно, очень внимательно. Этот пост изменит твою жизнь, потому что информация, о которой я тебе расскажу уж точно изменила мою. На трейдинге и инвестициях за последние пару лет я потерял больше $100k, зарабатывал все с ретро и бизнесов, а нес в «Казино», чтобы заработать больше) Пора признаться честно – я ненавижу трейдинг. Нужно быть дисциплинированным, не лудоманом и обладать огромным багажом зн

🏆49custom 5253838394307412647139custom 52538756359688353533🐳2🔥2

9 Nov 2025, 11:04 UTC≈3,420 views34 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

У меня очень щедрые друзья… Кто они такие? – Самый лучший прокси сервис для криптанов из всех существующих. ЛУЧШЕ ПРОСТО НЕТ, Я НЕ ШУЧУ! А совсем недавно они стали еще лучше, потому что добавили новый вид прокси. HTTP – круто, но UDP во много раз быстрее и стабильнее. Технология на уровень выше. Не сказал бы, что у меня когда-то были претензии к обычным HTTP от ProxyWing, но если можно улучшиться – почему бы и нет?)

🏆15🔥8custom 525383839430741264765

26 Oct 2025, 11:24 UTC≈3,960 views108 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

$LINEA очень дешево. 230 млн$ рыночная капитализация. 1.1 B$ FDV. Открываю лонг по 0.0153$ с 3 плечом. Консенсус, метамаск, иксы неизбежны. Я заработал на линее единожды, планирую заработать и еще раз. Продал линею на споте и открыл на фьючерсах. Всем сопричастным удачи 🙏

custom 525387563596883535337custom 525383839430741264724👍13🔥1211🏆74

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @XardMoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 431,973 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хard Money” (@XardMoney), 4,891 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XardMoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.