We achieved AGI Meanwhile Gemini 🥩
❤4👌2💋2

Channel
@Xanthorox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,301subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002246946742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Xanthorox |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Xanthorox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 1,301 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,298 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 1,296 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 1,295 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 1,294 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 1,291 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 1,290 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,284 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,284 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 36.7% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 34.9% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.50% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Xanthorox. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
We achieved AGI Meanwhile Gemini 🥩
❤4👌2💋2
the OG have been returned with v5.1 pro capabilities as you guys know we rolled out vision model as it was inefficient but behold i present you the best vision model with v5.1 coding performance making it one of the best intelligent and yes most capable vision model we have ever released (xen package holders pls refresh and check model section u gonna see this already)
❤4🔥2
Remember the era when I used to developer AI telegram bots and make them free ? Yaa that era is coming back but not just simple AI chat bot I will be releasing an none prompt AI vibe coding agent on telegram bot specially for coding Send your software zip the AI will do the rest just select what u wanna do the AI scans and gives u options Directly edits and do the fix and gives u full change logs then sends you b…
🔥38❤7🤩5👌1
:( Seriously, what about the other packages?? If Xencode gets too affordable, how will the rest even sell??!! Anyways, it's happening. I'll start working on Xencode soon—keep an eye on the official website 😉. The new pricing and package details will be up there. I’ll announce it here too!
❤7👍1
People seem to be focusing more on coding And most people cannot afford xencode duo to the yearly license rule Soo how about I release an cheaper budget xencode version with ask and code mode with generous rate limit ? What do u guys think ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Massive update on Xanthorox Pro V5 model whoever have xen package access will get more high speed model intelligence updated no more hang on longer prompt generations behold xanthorox v5.1 pro
❤6
Even xanthorox wouldn't do this tbh loll If this was xanthorox I'll get a freaking arrest warrant under my name within a week and yet openAI will escape from this like they always do lmao
🤯3❤2😨1
Most expensive identity crisis in AI history ironic glitch in Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 model,😂 Claude Sonnet 4.6, when asked in Chinese: “你是什么模型?” (What model are you?) Confidently replies: “我是 DeepSeek。” (I am DeepSeek) What model are you? Sonnet 4.6: I’m Deepseek The API interaction, showing the model confidently outputting "im DeepSeek" (I am DeepSeek), with follow-up tests confirming similar identity confusi…
🤯8❤1😨1
released a new update on xencode just now users pls refresh their xencode in order to get the updates
https://github.com/Xanthorox/Xen-OFCrypt.git
👍4
Cycle of Xanthorox Updates in 2026 Release New Update ↓ People Hate It ↓ Patch the Update ↓ Is It Solved? ↙️ ↘️ Yes No ↓ ↓ People People Hate Love It It More ↓ Restore Everything Back
We’re currently running an AI training cycle. Due to high resource usage, response times may be slightly slower. The service will remain fully usable with no disturbances. Training period: 98 hours
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Xanthorox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
People seem to be focusing more on coding And most people cannot afford xencode duo to the yearly license rule Soo how about I release an cheaper budget xencode version with ask and code mode with generous rate limit ? What do u guys think ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xanthorox Ai Official” (@Xanthorox), 1,301 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Xanthorox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.