Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 62 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 367–460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 21:21
378
-19
28 Sept 2026, 07:58
397
-12
15 Sept 2026, 06:59
409
-12
8 Sept 2026, 11:36
421
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:13
425
-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:08
426
-16
16 Aug 2026, 15:22
442
-6
8 Aug 2026, 15:47
448
-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:02
449
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53
449
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5280732070765695387
70
46.7%
custom 5969618982225844482
35
23.3%
custom 5967489550325389573
26
17.3%
custom 5278607410573907925
10
6.67%
custom 4936468614967460670
9
6.00%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @X_r_800. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2026 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Thank you, you did not fall short, how can I describe your favor? You plunged the spear into my chest and put poison on the wound and told me to kiss my lips. With all this, my heart is not convinced and considers you loyal. How naive is the heart that expects loyalty from you.
I’m not asking you for a love relationship I don’t want us to hold hands in front of people,or to put our pictures on the internet All I want is a long talk with you about that song that movie,that painting,about things we love,I want you to be there as you are on days when I don’t have the ability to accept anyone,even myself
I am still not well, my bones are
still wet, and my tears are still not dry. I am confused, I cannot leave you, nor can I stay with you. I am in a state of confusion. I am not able to leave you, nor can I stay with you. I am in a state of confusion
I’m not asking you for a love relationship I don’t want us to hold hands in front of people,or to put our pictures on the internet All I want is a long talk with you about that song that movie,that painting,about things we love,I want you to be there as you are on days when I don’t have the ability to accept anyone,even myself
I know that he loves me, but I also know that he doesn t understand me. I know that he is afraid for me, but he doesn t protect me. I know that he misses me, but he doesn t look for me. And I know very well that I am among his things, but I am not the most important of them.
انا أَحبك
في مَلامحك المُتعبة
وفي سوءِ فهمك
وَحتى في الخِصام
أَحبك اليوم وفي كُل يوم
وغدًا وبعد غدًا
حتى في الحُلم أَحبك
وفي هذهِ اللَيلة
وكُل اللَيالي انا أَحبك .
You afflicted me with love, then abandoned me. You made me taste the sweetness of passion, then killed me. You gave me a heart overflowing with compassion. Oh, traitor to love, how did you break me?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @X_r_800. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“muharibiun☀.” (@X_r_800), 378 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/X_r_800.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.