Channel
@XXOOTVB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21,627subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001887064565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XXOOTVB |
| Created | 9 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XXOOTVB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 21,627 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 21,635 | +28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 21,607 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 21,595 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 21,572 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 21,580 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 9 June 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,315 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 661 | 50.3% | |
| 🤔 | 132 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 128 | 9.73% | |
| 🎉 | 125 | 9.51% | |
| 🤩 | 113 | 8.59% | |
| 😁 | 74 | 5.63% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 2.21% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 1.90% | |
| 😍 | 20 | 1.52% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.608% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2023 to 2 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎈 🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈 🎈 🎈 淫领全球💥 @AVTVB 🎈 热门精品AV @XOATV 🎈 小湿妹TV @XXOOTVB 🎈 男女那点事儿 @XOMWS 🎈 口交奶子后入 @XOWKZ 🎈 少妇人妻熟女 @XOGND 🎈 吃瓜娱乐骚货 @XOEGV 🎈 国产自拍短片 @XOMFR 🎈 精品偷情福利 @XODSV 🎈 探花约炮绿帽 @XOWBI 🎈 成人出轨情侣 @XORHG 🎈 小湿妹猎奇 @XODYF 🎈 🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈 🎈 小湿妹合集 @XXOOVIP 🎈 资源库合集 @XXOOSVIP 🎈 小湿妹反差 @XXOOLV 🎈 小湿妹视频 @…
👍299🥰62🤔61🎉59🤩36💯29👏20😁20
解决IOS用户，无法查看成人频道方法 Telegram 如果你进入某个群或频道遇到如下提示： This channel can't displayed because it was used to spread pornographic content. ✅解决办法： 登录Telegram Web网页版链接： https://web.telegram.org （复制到浏览器打开） ⚡️操作： 登录网页版后 ➊点击「Settings/设置」 ➋点击「Privacy and Security/隐私和安全」 ➌找到「Sensitive content/敏感内容」并勾选「Disable filtering/禁用过滤」 ➍ 重启 iOS 客户端即可正常访问， ❓评论区问题汇总: 找不到「Disable filtering」选项； 用伊斯兰国家的电话号码注册的电报都无法禁用过滤，只能换个手机号码，从新注册尝试 登录网页版时收不到验证码…
👍57🤔8🤩6😁6👏5😍5
无法私信 ✅解决办法 首先关注 👉 @spambot 然后点击start后、依次按顺序点击 But I can't message non-contacts! No,I'll never do any for this! 最后打字输入👇（可点击复制） I cannot write to my non-contacts. 等待半小时就正常私信啦
👍145🤩7🥰3😁2🎉1
简体中文语言包 直接点击链接汉化 Telegram : https://t.me/setlanguage/zhcncc 官网网页版不能使用语言包 如果不能更改语言包, 把客户端升级新版, 官网下载: https://telegram.org/apps
👍160🎉65🤩64🤔63🥰63😁46
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @XXOOTVB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@XXOOTVB edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 1,103,547 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@XXOOTVB named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小湿妹TV” (@XXOOTVB), 21,627 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XXOOTVB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.