هنوز چنلمو دارن بررسی میکنن😂
Signed Amir

Channel
@XRealmen
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,671subscribers
-255 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001848033580 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XRealmen |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XRealmen |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 5,671 | -23 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 5,694 | -19 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 5,713 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:20 | 5,730 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 5,742 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 5,751 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 5,759 | +2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:57 | 5,757 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 5,767 | +10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 5,757 | -23 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 5,780 | -17 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 5,797 | -15 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 5,812 | -29 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 5,841 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 5,839 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 5,852 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 5,861 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:11 | 5,872 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 5,887 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 5,891 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,057 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
هنوز چنلمو دارن بررسی میکنن😂
Signed Amir
سلام میخواستم دوره روان زنان رو تهیه کنم پنل اسنپ پی اوکی شده؟!!
Signed Amir
این چه سوالیه اخه😂
Signed Amir
https://t.me/XRealmen/9419 نمیشه خوشتیپ باشیم و موفق؟
Signed Amir
پسر خوشتیپ و زیبا میشه مدل برای تبلیغات یک محصول اما پسر متوسط میاد میشه صاحب اون محصول
Signed Amir
شاید بخوای غر بزنی که خب چرا باید یکی هیچ تلاشی نکنه ولی من بکنم این کجاش عدالته؟ اما من اینو میبینم وقتی تو میای صحبت کردن و شخصیتتو درست میکنی همه جا خفن میشی هم توی بیزینس هم پول دراوردن هم جایگاه اجتماعی پسری که زیباست و هیچ تلاشی نمیکنه چن بار دیدین بیزینس خیلی خفن و توپ داشته باشه؟ اما هرچی پسر با ظاهر متوسطه انقد رو خودش کار کرده شده کار افرین پس حواستون به ورودی های ذهنتون باشه
Signed Amir
من خودمم قدم متوسطه اما تاثیری داره؟ به هیچ وجه شما اگه ظاهر و قدتون متوسطه باید عوضش جای دیگه قوی تر شید یعنی قدرت صحبت کردن و شخصیت پسرای مدل و جذاب و خوش قیافه نیازی به اموزش روان زن ندارن ، هرکاری کنن دختر کنار میاد و میمونه اما شما باید بتونین شخصیتتونو رشد بدین تا بتونین با اون پسرای خوش فیس رقابت کنید و کارگاه روان زن برای همینه
Signed Amir
سلام آقا امیر وقتتون بخیر واقعیتش میخواستم یچیزی بگم اینکه این قد و قیافه و این چیزا الان خیلی زیاد ملاک روابط شده و احساس میکنم چیزایی ملاک قرار گرفته میشن که اونقدرا شاید چیز خیلی زیاد مهمی نباشن. از روی همین موضوع خیلی از پسرایی که حالا به هر دلیلی قد و هیکل متوسط یا کوتاهی دارن واقعا زیر یجور فشار روانی میرن چون اصلا با اینجور ملاک ها و تفکرات توی جامعه احساس میکنن دیده نمیشن و نمیتونن اصلا در آینده رابطه با فرد …
Signed Amir
صفر تا صد مشکل شما اعتماد به نفسه و من داخل این دوره کمکتون میکنم ناخودآگاه رو مثل موم تو دستتون بگیرید و اعتماد به نفستون رو صد پله بیشتر کنید
Signed Amir
سلام در خصوص دوره روان زنان چند تا سوال داشتم امکانش هست راهنمایی کنید مطمعن نیستم این دوره به درد من میخوره یا نه!! ۱۹ سالمه و تا حالا با کسی رابطه نداشتم و کلا رفتارم با خانوما متفاوته با مردا خیلی راحت و اوکی ارتباط بر قرار میکنم ولی با خانوم ها که مواجه میشم اضطراب اجتماعیم چند برابر میشه و کارمم طوریه که با خانوما ممکنه زیاد بر خورد داشته باشم و این خیلی آزار دهندست کلا در جمع هایی که خانومای غریبه هستن نمی…
Signed Amir
متاسفانه پسر ها گاهی از سر لج هم شده مخالفت میکنن از سر شکست هایی که خوردن اما معمولا خانم ها عاقلانه تر تصمیم میگیرن توی زندگی واقعی گاهی دیدید که پدرتون تصمیم احساسی شاید گرفته اما مادرتون هی سعی کرده پدرتون رو منصرف کنه خانم ها برای مسائل بی اهمیت احساسی برخورد میکنن اما برای تصمیمات مهم از اقایون عاقل تر میشن
Signed Amir
پیام هاتون انرژی بخش و باعث لطف گفتم که علم من رو خانم ها میتونن تایید کنن ، برای همین با خیال راحت تدریس میکنم
Signed Amir
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @XRealmen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شکارچی” (@XRealmen), 5,671 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XRealmen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.