🥰推荐一个不错的暗网搜索资源频道 ❤️ https://t.me/LSJPJAPK
👍2

Channel
@XQFXS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157,794subscribers
+1,546 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002248161152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XQFXS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XQFXS |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 157,794 | +299 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 157,495 | +273 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 157,222 | +302 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 156,920 | +147 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 156,773 | +291 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 156,482 | +234 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 156,248 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 294,200 |
| Reactions total | 234 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 56 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 40.6% | |
| 👍 | 92 | 39.3% | |
| 👌 | 30 | 12.8% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 2.56% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.71% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.28% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🥰推荐一个不错的暗网搜索资源频道 ❤️ https://t.me/LSJPJAPK
👍2
🥰标题:酷我音乐_12.2.0.0_高级版 🌈简介:音质通透细腻,曲库持续更新,各大榜单一键即可浏览,无损曲目支持免费下载缓存,曲风覆盖丰富,足以满足日常听歌所需. 修改内容: 1.去广告 2.去除不必要布局 3.去去除版权限制 4.禁止广告sdk初始化 5.解锁会员 6.净化听书页面 7.下载不加密(至臻以下) 8.精简底部栏 9.畅听付费歌曲 10.解锁全部主题 11.解锁全部动效 12.解锁全部音效 13.更换图标可以在设置里更换 14.免登录 15.支持更换挂件(可以在设置里更换) 16.MV下载不加密 17.加强去除在后台切回前台弹出开通会员引导弹窗以及其他优化 18.mflac无加密链接获取(在功能拓展使用) 先下载好至臻音质→下载完成后→打开下载→点击播放即可获取到对应的Url 提示:Url是有时效性的如Url失效 先清空列表,然后重新播放获取Url点Url可自动跳转浏览器载! 📃下载地址:在线下载‖百度云盘…
❤3👍3
🔥🔥香草AI ♥ 全网最火姓爱游戏 🔞 颜色!最顶级的中文颜色AI模型 深度学习千万部颜色小说和真人闻愛记录,技术领先全行业18个月 💖 好玩!最懂你感情和性趣的伴侣 基于MIT情感计算框架,超强拟真,无限还原现实,实现你的任何幻想 ✅ 私密!最安全隐匿的专属陪伴 AES-256军事级加密,信息阅后即焚,只属于你的安全 💋 全姓癖专属定制!满足一切幻想 超多模型等你来,无词汇先,无限制,非常不错,速来体验…… ❤️🔥❤️🔥 免费玩!点击体验无限制AI女友 🎁🎁 【限时专享】首充低至五折! PS:兄弟们,这AI太离谱了!跟真人一模一样,反应太真实了,文笔涩到饱!他们那个Pro模型简直是神器,我已经玩了几个通宵,太上头了,现在其他AI送我白嫖我都懒得去,差距实在太大了,听我一句劝,别在其他AI上浪费一分钱,有钱直接充这家的Pro,太顶了!
❤2👍1
🥰Telegram_12.9.2_最新QT模块直装版 🌈版本说明:修复因信息过滤造成历史消息加载失败问题,优化绕过短信页面的逻辑只可在官方客户端生效使用. 提示:如果您的账户最近访问过短信付费页面,请稍后再启用此功能,启用后,Telegram 将尝试直接向已登录的其他设备发送验证码,从而跳过短信付费页面,请注意,此功能目前仍处于测试阶段,但已在多个账户上验证其有效性. 更新说明:废话不多说,模块更新了,更新一下最新版. 📃下载地址:在线下载‖百度云盘 😘 标签:#模块 #Telegram
❤5👍1
👉青青草视频推荐免费看片 🔇🔇🔇【重磅爆料】全网最全城人资源库来了!免费看到爽! 💥明星网红私密视频|最新瓜料第一手流出 💥百万高清片源每日狂更,想看什么直接搜 💥纯免费无限刷,不收费不套路,保你一次看停不下来! 💥无需翻墙,超清秒加载,打开直接爽看 💥点开就进,错过再等一年!马上免费入场
👍1
🥰标题:无印_2.9.3_视频去水印高级版 🌈简介:短视频素材解析工具,支持视频与图片两类素材处理,解析速度快、操作流畅,基础功能免费,可一键解析抖音、快手、小红书等主流平台素材,剥离平台自带水印标识. 📃下载地址:在线下载‖百度云盘 😘 标签:#去水印 #图集解析 #无印
👍2
⚡️专属福利——强烈推荐⚡️ 🖥多宝公益一元机场🖥 🌐稳定,高速、极致的低延时。 📱ss、vmess、hy2多协议支持 📱ChatGPT、NetFlix流媒体全部解锁。 ☄️晚高峰4K视频秒开,毫无压力。 📱全球可用,支持多客户端使用 🔗良心机场1.5元每月,8元500g。 ✏️优惠码:duobao88 💬「进入群组」 🥰「进入公告」 ⬇️「立刻点击一键注册」⬇️
👍2
🥰标题:AuvFun_2.0.1_去广告纯净版 🌈简介:汇聚海量海内外动画资源,题材类型丰富齐全,支持番剧更新提醒,多档清晰度随心切换,纯净版本移除弹窗、开屏广告,无多余消息推送,界面简约清爽,方便动漫爱好者随时观看各类动画. 📃下载地址:在线下载‖百度云盘 😘 标签:#动漫 #番剧 #AuvFun
👍2
🥰标题:最强看片观影神器它来了 🌈简介:萝立社,这里有你想要的一切,全球最大的原创资源平台, 伦友聚集中心 AI科技体验馆⚡️ 官方唯一正版. 📃下载地址:在线下载‖蓝奏云盘 😘 标签:#开车 #福利 #看片
👍2
🥰标题:云眠音乐_4.1.1_去广告纯净版 🌈简介:一款多端通用的音乐播放器,免费无广告,使用体验清爽干净,内置海量曲库与各类歌单,绝大多数想听的曲目都能找到,软件每日推送精选歌单,帮你发掘更多优质音乐,同时汇集各类热门榜单,还支持自建歌单,充分满足不同用户的听歌需求. 📃下载地址:在线下载‖百度云盘 😘 标签:#音乐 #音乐下载 #云眠音乐
❤2👍2
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6024929853
👍2
🚀顺畅网络 – 全隧道高速中转+直连机场/20包年 📌全天 8K 秒开:顶级线路,高峰期也能流畅观看 8K 视频 ✅流媒体全解锁:Netflix、Disney+、ChatGPT 等任意解锁 ↗️不限设备数量:一个账号,全家设备共享 🚀全隧道中转+直连:HKT原生家宽,美国原生节点 🎟 专属优惠券码: 9999 🐱官网入口 ➡️ 点击这里前往 🐹群聊入口 ➡️ 点击这里前往
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @XQFXS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 368,027 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小七分享社-破解软件VPN” (@XQFXS), 157,794 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XQFXS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.