Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for XPEPE to the Moon 🌔

Channel

XPEPE to the Moon 🌔

@XPepe_Ann

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001906775485
TypeChannel
Username@XPepe_Ann
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 2 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/XPepe_Ann

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

128129128.512 August 2026 — 129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 129 subscribers20 August 2026 — 128 subscribers13 September 2026 — 129 subscribers12 August 202613 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 32 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 23:22129+1
20 Aug 2026, 07:35128-1
12 Aug 2026, 18:33129no change
12 Aug 2026, 17:33129first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

971 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰32733.7%
❤19820.4%
🔥17317.8%
👏10711.0%
👍919.37%
🤩737.52%
❤‍🔥10.103%
👌10.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2023 to 3 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 May 2023, 03:04 UTC≈1,250 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Biggest Buy Contest Result 1. 0x48b5…4248 ➖ 10.0525 BNB 2. 0x4c3a…fbe6 ➖ 5.1121 BNB 3. 0xbdeb…94dd ➖ 3.8133 BNB This is the winners list. Please DM @George_Xpepe to receive the prize

👍12❤2🔥1

2 May 2023, 19:25 UTC≈1,250 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@lawlee93 https://unblemished.marketing/ He support me list cmc and cgk. People can dm him for confirm Xpepe fast track !!!

🔥19👍6❤2

2 May 2023, 17:46 UTC986 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

534 holder right now 🔥🔥🔥 New Ath coming !!!

🔥14❤2👏2❤‍🔥1

2 May 2023, 17:43 UTC851 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://ave.ai/token/0x28a7d9d9ff581e24765d9c1fa94238fc4b1f740a-bsc?from=Token Logo on Ave updated !!! Trending will come soon !!!

🔥7👍1

2 May 2023, 17:36 UTC396 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocatcallsPhoto

XPEPE another great launch almost 4x and now holding at 3x team pushed really well. Congratulations to those got in at presale after our call XPepe is a novel cryptocurrency venture that merges SpaceX and PEPE to aid investors in reaching the moon once it becomes available for trading. Telegram | Website |

🔥6❤1👌1👏1

2 May 2023, 17:20 UTC975 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HULKSGEMSCALLSPhoto

Nice 4x for the fam , team pushing hard for a new ATH so could see a nice pump especially with the Pepe hype ! Keep your eyes on this one https://www.dexview.com/bsc/0x28a7d9D9FF581e24765d9C1FA94238fC4b1f740a https://t.me/Xpepe_Official

🥰55❤31🔥11👍8👏8🤩3

2 May 2023, 17:13 UTC≈1,230 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

XPepe stake will release soon !!! Dev team working hard for big new coming !!! ✅Buy PCS: https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0x28a7d9D9FF581e24765d9C1FA94238fC4b1f740a 📈Chart DEXVIEW: https://www.dexview.com/bsc/0x28a7d9D9FF581e24765d9C1FA94238fC4b1f740a 📈Chart DEXTOOLS: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/bnb/pair-explorer/0x78cbadc5be3b62e7da2a6c90bf8e560f487247b7 📈Chart POOCOIN: https://poocoin.app/toke…

🤩29👏23❤19🥰17👍15🔥15

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @XPepe_Ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XPEPE to the Moon 🌔” (@XPepe_Ann), 129 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XPepe_Ann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.