Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for X 𝑴𝑶𝑫🇨🇳(原小铭)

Channel

X 𝑴𝑶𝑫🇨🇳(原小铭)

@XMZZ66

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,368subscribers

-1,150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002269702811
TypeChannel
Username@XMZZ66
DescriptionX𝑴𝑶𝑫中国唯一频道🇨🇳 负责人/反馈/频道主: @XM96996
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/XMZZ66

Growth

19,36820,51819,9437 August 2026 — 20,518 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,515 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,479 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,293 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,208 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,017 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,926 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,858 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,792 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,771 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,755 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,694 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,616 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,591 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,513 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,476 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,431 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,368 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1,150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,196–20,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 15:0819,368-63
28 Aug 2026, 12:2319,431-45
27 Aug 2026, 10:1319,476-37
26 Aug 2026, 13:2219,513-78
25 Aug 2026, 13:1219,591-25
24 Aug 2026, 15:1719,616-78
22 Aug 2026, 21:1519,694-61
21 Aug 2026, 12:0319,755-16
20 Aug 2026, 12:4719,771+11
19 Aug 2026, 13:1519,760-32
18 Aug 2026, 11:5319,792-66
17 Aug 2026, 13:1319,858-68
16 Aug 2026, 01:4419,926-91
14 Aug 2026, 14:5520,017-106
13 Aug 2026, 08:5220,123-85
12 Aug 2026, 11:1420,208-85
11 Aug 2026, 08:5220,293-186
10 Aug 2026, 09:0120,479-31
9 Aug 2026, 12:0120,510-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:0120,515first reading

Engagement

250 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.96%
avg views ÷ 19,368 subscribers
Avg views / post
380
248 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
250
of 250 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held250 (7 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total94,190
Reactions total2,422
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,690
Videos
113
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,422 reactions across 248 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,03484.0%
1154.75%
🕊662.73%
🤯512.11%
🖕441.82%
🤓291.20%
🥰240.991%
🤬150.619%
👎100.413%
🤔70.289%
🤮70.289%
🔥60.248%
😭50.206%
😁30.124%
🤪20.083%
🌚10.041%
👏10.041%
💩10.041%
💯10.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 248 of the 250 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,422reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC430 views20 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

爽吃,但我开了梅花所以正常禁网30分钟了

👍18🥰2

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

29 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC459 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍17🕊1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

29 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC418 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍17🕊1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

29 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC410 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍15🕊1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

29 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC491 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

太稳定了,连打8级

👍16🕊3

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

29 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC470 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍14🕊2

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC561 views22 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍183🤓1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC665 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026

42杀直接到黄金

👍13

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC680 views14 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍14

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC618 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍12🥰1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC603 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026

用上了,爆率都变高了

👍11🥰1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

28 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC610 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

😍😍😍

👍10🥰1

Signed 小铭(淡圈)

Showing the 12 most recent of 250 posts we hold for @XMZZ66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@XMZZ66 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 291,274 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“X 𝑴𝑶𝑫🇨🇳(原小铭)” (@XMZZ66), 19,368 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XMZZ66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.