Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

星火王者公益端口通知频道

@XHNHNB412

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,357subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003288767121
TypeChannel
Username@XHNHNB412
Created8 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/XHNHNB412

Growth

2,3032,3572,33013 Aug 2026, 11:32 — 2,303 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 18:55 — 2,357 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 11:3214 Aug 2026, 18:55
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,295–2,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:552,357+54
13 Aug 2026, 11:322,303first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 2,357 subscribers
Avg views / post
444
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.295%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held13 (8 January 202613 August 2026)
Views total2,665
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍466.7%
233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC124 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

有人问我为什么不直接公益了,还要发视频才能领卡,因为黑子和白眼狼太多了,我免费公益给你们用,后台20多个人玩反馈也没有,然后还要投票诋毁,还有疯狗来骂我乱咬人

13 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC127 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

王者没有网络问题,已经完美解决,之前一直没有问题的,也建议卡密到期之后重新注册一个账号密码进行使用

1👍1

13 Aug 2026, 02:25 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

8.13号星火公益端口反馈,同号一直连打,无敌稳定

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC119 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

由于之前发起的投票,小黑子太多了,所以不再直接进行公益 嫌宣传麻烦或者不想宣传的富哥们也可以直接购买:https://new.zmfaka.cn/shop/ICNVBVL3 🎣免费领卡白嫖卡密活动: 💖作品要求: 💖快手抖音等平台发布关于星火公益端口的作品和测评 💖没有素材的可以在频道随便保存几张反馈 💖评论区置顶:星火公益端口神秘代码 @XHNHNB412 ⚡️作品必须带话题 内容: #星火公益端口 领卡反馈客服 @xinghuo412

1👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,640 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

【星火】王者公益端囗 已经完美适配新赛季 无客户端防闪框防卡框防强标 使用网络拦截,不进行任何本地内存修改 不会追外挂180 没有任何解密 任何语言都是苍白的,稳定性自己看 通知主频道 @XHNHNB412 下载地址以及视频教程:https://1816194271.share.123pan.cn/123pan/jHN5Vv-9GZ0v 注册地址: http://xhnb666.top/ 反馈客服 @xinghuo412 不禁言交流频道 @XHNHNB6 每天实时返馈图在交流群里面看就行

👍1

10 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC509 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

没进QQ群的都进一下,更新什么的都会第一时间在群里发的

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @XHNHNB412. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 857,321 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“星火王者公益端口通知频道” (@XHNHNB412), 2,357 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XHNHNB412.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.