Posted without readable text

Channel
X Force
@XFrcee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
748subscribers
-140 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002575383340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @XFrcee |
| Created | 17 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/XFrcee |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 748 | -31 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 779 | -53 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 832 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 832 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 845 | -27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 872 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 876 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 886 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 888 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447136141947978904 | 104 | 75.9% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 7.30% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.92% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1️⃣🔤O5-10: 🟢The Mad General: Position Empty •Highly secretive, often portrayed as a female former Foundation hitman or combat expert. •Considered the most proficient killer in the foundation with vast combat experience. •Believed to handle many black ops, tactical missions, and enforcement of the Foundation’s will. 1️⃣1️⃣O5-11: 🟢The Mailman: Position Empty His most well-known role is to sign off on Termination Ord…
custom 544713614194797890430
🦋The O5 Council🦋 They hold Level 5 Security Clearance, granting them full access to every Foundation secret and the final say over all operations. Known only by their numeric designations, their true identities remain classified, their power absolute, and their influence feared by all. 🔣O5 Council Members🔣 1️⃣O5-1: 🟢The Founder: Identity Unknown An ageless/Immortal Entity. The one who founded X-Force and the O5 C…
custom 544713614194797890412
⚡️Welcome to the heart of X-Force: The O5 Council hierarchy—the secret command that runs the Foundation. The entities who know everything, control everything, and stay hidden from most. Our hierarchy system mirrors this mystery: 🟢Low ranks stay in the dark, handling day-to-day tasks 🟢Higher ranks gain access to secrets and exclusive powers few ever see 🟢At the top? The elusive O5 Council—the true rulers, known only …
custom 544713614194797890414
☣️ 🔠🔣🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ☣️ WELCOME, We are the shield standing between the world and the unknown. We don’t just follow orders — we live the mission. Our strength lies in every member, every operation, and every moment we stay alert. ⭐️OUR MISSION: 🟢Protect humanity from threats few dare to face. 🟢Support each other with sharp teamwork, vital knowledge, and reliable backup. 🟢Contain the unknown …
custom 544713614194797890418
🔤Information regarding everyone's role and the Hierarchy of X-Force will be shared very soon! Join this channel for the Updates.
custom 544713614194797890411❤7
❗️Announcement for Non-Members❗️ •We have created an Official Chat of X-Force for all the people who aren't X-Force members and wish to chat with us and discuss their problems. 🛫Join @XfrcChat Now and start your journey with us❗️
custom 544713614194797890412🔥4❤3
• X Force is not written. It is carved into the world by the fearless. - It does not bow to fear, it does not kneel to weakness. • X Force is the power of those who rise. - Every tag, every name, every member is a soldier of change. -🔥 Join. Stand. Become more than a follower. Become X Force. Only the bold survive. Only the united conquer. - Your destiny is not given. It is taken. • Use our tag [ χ ]. Prove your lo…
🤯9custom 54471361419479789043
X Force : is not the creation of one man, nor the possession of one leader. It is not bound by blood, nor chained to power. X Force belongs to no single person… it belongs to all who dare to rise. We are not divided by names, not separated by walls, not broken by fear. We are one. X Force is unity. It is the fire that burns in every heart that refuses to kneel. It is the strength of the many, fused into a single for…
🤯10custom 54471361419479789044
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @XFrcee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“X Force” (@XFrcee), 748 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XFrcee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.