11 measurements spanning 8 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,507–22,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:43
22,525
-18
13 Aug 2026, 14:37
22,543
-28
12 Aug 2026, 17:34
22,571
+7
11 Aug 2026, 21:04
22,564
-8
10 Aug 2026, 22:01
22,572
-10
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
22,582
-17
9 Aug 2026, 01:51
22,599
-20
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
22,619
-20
7 Aug 2026, 03:56
22,639
-8
6 Aug 2026, 14:20
22,647
no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:19
22,647
first reading
Engagement
123 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 22,525 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,270
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.859%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 123 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 123 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
123 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
770,857
Reactions total
6,618
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,150
Videos
≈7,400
Links
≈5,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,618 reactions across 120 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,694
40.7%
❤
1,275
19.3%
💯
746
11.3%
😱
506
7.65%
👎
391
5.91%
👏
315
4.76%
😢
248
3.75%
🔥
238
3.60%
🤬
101
1.53%
😡
74
1.12%
😍
22
0.332%
👌
4
0.06%
🤝
4
0.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,618reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
96
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 123 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XALQDARDI_1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 123 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сиз учун қайси бири муҳимроқ?
Муаммоларни очиқ кўрсатиб, камчиликларни танқид қиладиган каналларми ёки «ҳаммаси обод, ҳаммаси зўр» дея фақат ижобий хабарларни тарқатадиган расмий каналларми?
🔹 Танқидий ва муаммоларни очиқ ёритадиган каналлар муҳим63%
🔹 Иккаласи ҳам керак38%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ДИЛФУЗА ХАДЖАЕВА БУЙРУҚ БОРМИ ЁКИ ФАҚАТ ТОПШИРИҚМИ?
Фарғона шаҳри Ободонлаштириш бошқармасида 15 август куни ходимларни ишга жалб қилиш билан боғлиқ ҳолатлар жамоатчиликда савол уйғотмоқда. Ходимлар айтган маълумотлар рост бўлса, уларни соат 14:00 дан кейин ишга ким ва қайси ҳужжат асосида жалб қилган? Бу қарор раҳбар Дилфуза Хаджаеванинг топшириғи билан берилганми? Ходимларни муайян ҳудудларга бириктириш бўйича буй…
Бугун автобус ҳайдовчиларини эмас, оддий йўловчиларни танқид қиламиз.
Қўқон шаҳрига янги автобуслар келгани — албатта, қувонарли хабар. Замонавий, қулай ва йўловчилар учун шароит яратишга мўлжалланган автобуслар шаҳар аҳолисига хизмат қилмоқда.
Аммо масаланинг бошқа томони ҳам бор. Қўқон шаҳридаги 70-йўналишда ҳаракатланаётган янги автобусда кондиционер ишлаб турганини ҳатто пардаларнинг енгил хилпирашидан ҳам били…
Қачон бундай манқуртларга қарши курашамиз? Қачон спам босамиз, қачон обунамиздан ўчирамиз? Қачон «Жаннатим — онам» деб уйда кучада эса шундай жирканчларга кўнгил қўйишни бас қиламиз? Қачон эркаклар эркаклигича, ўз ҳокимияти ва қадр-қимматида қолади?
🕌 DIQQAT, QO'QONLIKLAR!
Qo'qon shahridagi Shayxon qabristonida obodonlashtirish va tozalash ishlari bo'yicha umumxalq hashari o'tkaziladi.
Barchangizni ajdodlarimiz mangu qo'nim topgan maskanni tozalashdek savobli ishda faol qatnashishga taklif qilamiz!
📅 Vaqti: 16-avgust kuni, soat 6:00da
📍 Manzil: Shayxon qabristoni
🛠 O'zingiz bilan: Ketmon, belkurak va o'roq kabi anjomlarni olib kelishingiz so'raladi.
Birgali…
ХАЛҚ ДАРДИ МУРОЖААТИ НАТИЖА БЕРДИ ҚИЛИЧМОЗОР КЎЧАСИГА ЯНГИ ЭЛЕКТР ТАРМОҒИ ТОРТИЛДИ
Андижон вилояти Жалақудуқ тумани Қиличмозор МФЙ ҳудудидаги Қиличмозор кўчаси аҳолисидан қувончли хабар.
Аҳоли томонидан икки йил давомида такроран билдириб келинган мурожаатлар ҳамда бир неча кун аввал «Халқ дарди» канали орқали ёритилган муаммоли масала ўз ечимини топди.
Мурожаат натижасида кўчадаги эски электр тармоғи ўрнига янги …
Қўқон шаҳри марказида жойлашган ушбу колодец қарийб 15 кундан буён очиқ ҳолда қолмоқда. Бу ҳолат ҳаракатланаётган автотранспорт воситалари учун жиддий хавф туғдирмоқда.
Ҳозирда хавфнинг олдини олиш мақсадида фақат дарахт шохи қўйилган, бироқ бу чора етарли эмас.
Масъул ташкилотлардан мазкур ҳолатни зудлик билан бартараф этиш, колодецни хавфсиз тарзда ёпиш ва автотранспорт воситалари ҳаракати хавфсизлигини таъминлаш…
Бефарқ бўлмай, эҳсон қилиб турган барча инсонларга катта раҳмат! 🤲
Яна бироз саховатингиз зарур. Ҳозирча операция учун етарлича маблағ йиғилгани йўқ.
Илтимос, ушбу хабарни яқинларингиз ва танишларингизга улашинг. Операция ўз вақтида ўтказилишига ўз ҳиссангизни қўшинг.
Бир ёш қизалоқнинг ҳаётини сақлаб қолишда бефарқ бўлманг! 🙏
Сизнинг кичик ёрдамингиз бир инсон ҳаёти учун катта умид бўлиши мумкин. ❤️
💳 Эҳсон учун…
🚨🚨🚨ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️📸
#БУГУН_ЗАРУР
МУҲТОЖ ОИЛАГА ЁРДАМ КЕРАК
Фарғона вилояти Фурқат тумани Шўхай қишлоғида яшовчи Фаридахон Ахунова айни вақтда оғир вазиятда қолган.
Фаридахон ижара уйда яшайди, боқувчиси йўқ.
Ўзи II гуруҳ ногирони, қарамоғида икки нафар қизи бор.
13 ёшли қизининг буйрагида тош пайдо бўлиб, аҳволи оғирлашгани сабабли Қўқон шаҳридаги SHER Med клиникасида шошилинч операция қилиниши керак.
Шифокорлар даволаниш …
❤17👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @XALQDARDI_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сиз учун қайси бири муҳимроқ?
Муаммоларни очиқ кўрсатиб, камчиликларни танқид қиладиган каналларми ёки «ҳаммаси обод, ҳаммаси зўр» дея фақат ижобий хабарларни тарқатадиган расмий каналларми?
🔹 Танқидий ва муаммоларни очиқ ёритадиган каналлар муҳим63%
🔹 Иккаласи ҳам керак38%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 СЎРОВНОМА
Сўнгги 3 йил ичида молиявий ҳолатингиз қандай ўзгарди?
🔘 Сезиларли даражада яхшиланди18%
🔘 Бироз яхшиланди16%
🔘 Деярли ўзгармади21%
🔘 Бироз ёмонлашди16%
🔘 Сезиларли даражада ёмонлашди28%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,000,211 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XALQ DARDI” (@XALQDARDI_1), 22,525 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XALQDARDI_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
