厦门工兵报告 【⚠️须提供约课记录才能发布加积分】 提交报告:@guafu0592或@XMGBKF 【出击日期】:10.5 【验证工兵】:心动签到处 【老师艺名】:王思柠 【老师账号】:@Wsn_o8 【城市地区】:湖里 【水费次数】:600 1p 【人照相似】:100 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:100 【身材曲线】:100 【乳房状态】:b 【臀部形态】:少女臀 【皮肤状态】:皮肤很好 【bb的状态】:紧,润爽 【服务评分】:100 【情绪价值】:100 【☀️后感】: 重度流感四天,今天可算能出来玩了。。很神奇,生病期间每一两个小时就会醒来,这一两天每天都要反复梦到思柠。。也许是太久没和思柠宝贝做爱了吧。。这不思柠就来厦门了嘛~嘿嘿约起来~ 进门简单寒暄就一起洗澡去了,感觉非常好,熟悉的语调,让人有新鲜感的示意你试一下水温的小动作,彼此之间互道心意后的小欢喜,还有。。。香香香极了的发香!思柠先…

Channel
王思柠Vlog
@WsnXN5h2s1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
409subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004307012911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WsnXN5h2s1 |
| Description | 双向限制: @Wsn_8Bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WsnXN5h2s1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 409 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 409 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 509.6%
- avg views ÷ 409 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,080
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.087%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 September 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 41,686 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 88.2% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
满课啦,可提前预约明天喔,谢谢哥哥们的喜爱
❤1
厦门开课中,开始预约啦,每天🖐🏻个位置喔🙂
今天休息喔,明天厦门开课,可提前预约啦😉 @Wsn_o8
莆田老师体验报告: https://t.me/putianlsj 各花入各眼,每一朵鲜花都有耀眼的时刻,需要我们发现她的美。出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗️ 『总体评级』:良好 【日期】:10.3 【验证人】:@Hrsmw69 【联系方式】:@Wsn_o8 【地 区 】:莆田 【颜值/打扮】:比照片好看 【身材曲线】:照片一样 【服务水平】:对得起价格 【水费】6➖1 【体型】:偏瘦 【皮肤】:白嫩 【详情】:之前问了几次没和老师对上时间 群里表哥总说这个老师最嫩咋样咋样 看到群主发工兵券果断出击预约 确实如表哥们所说 有点像未成年 看到酮体后我有点不太好意思了 💦很多 很紧致后入位换传教士出水走人 总之 图嫩的来就对了 【妹子优点】:颜值高 【妹子缺点】:冷脸 【推荐指数】⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟
❤1
Posted without readable text
开课啦家人们头课在哦现在有空可以预约啦
Posted without readable text
头课在喔,先到先得🙂 @Wsn_o8
❤3👎1
莆田正常开课中,有位
正常开课中,头课有在
🤮1
休息喔,开课通知
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WsnXN5h2s1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“王思柠Vlog” (@WsnXN5h2s1), 409 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WsnXN5h2s1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.