Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for World Capital πŸ“Š

Channel

World Capital πŸ“Š

@World_Capital_001

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

1,086subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002029891568
TypeChannel
Username@World_Capital_001
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/World_Capital_001

Growth

1,0801,0961,08813 August 2026 β€” 1,095 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,093 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 1,096 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 1,090 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 1,091 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 1,087 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 1,086 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 1,080 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 1,086 subscribers1,08613 August 20265 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,078–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 09:581,086+6
1 Sept 2026, 22:271,080-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:561,086-1
26 Aug 2026, 22:241,087-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:061,091+1
20 Aug 2026, 23:281,090-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:371,096+3
14 Aug 2026, 13:171,093-2
13 Aug 2026, 14:311,095first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
7.32%
avg views Γ· 1,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.8%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held19 (11 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total1,511
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯2314.1%
πŸŽ„137.98%
πŸŽ‰137.98%
πŸ˜‡127.36%
🀝127.36%
⚑106.13%
❀‍πŸ”₯106.13%
🍾106.13%
😍106.13%
πŸ†’95.52%
πŸ‘95.52%
πŸ†84.91%
😎74.29%
πŸ‘Œ63.68%
🀩63.68%
πŸ’―53.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC23 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ikkinchi marta ham shu zonadan harakat +270 pips πŸ‘ŠπŸ»βœŠπŸ»

🀝3❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸŽ„1

13 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC44 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

πŸŽ‰2🀩2😍2⚑1πŸŽ„1🀝1

13 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC52 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

+430 pips harakat hammagayam emas 🀫

πŸ”₯3πŸ’―2🍾1πŸŽ„1🀝1

13 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC85 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Xauusd sell 4405 gacha sell kiraman

πŸ”₯4😍3πŸŽ‰2πŸŽ„1πŸ†’1

13 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Assalomu alaykum mujiki πŸ‘ŠπŸ»βœŠπŸ» Boshladikmi ???

❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘3πŸ”₯2🀝1πŸ˜‡1

12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC95 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sal ko’zilarni ochilar mujiki 400 pipsdan oshiq yurmoqda har bir signal tasavvur qivossilarmi uncha bunchasiga emas tizim yaratilar hammasini yaxshi bo’ladi

πŸ”₯4❀‍πŸ”₯2🍾1πŸŽ„1πŸ˜‡1😎1πŸ†’1

12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC86 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍾3πŸŽ„1πŸ˜‡1πŸ†’1

12 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

+445 pips πŸ‘ŠπŸ»βœŠπŸ» Tradingda pulni qanchaligi emas analiz signal tplarni anniqligi journalingni haftalik oylik va yillik win ratelarim kamida 85/15 ligi muhim 🀫😎

πŸŽ‰4πŸŽ„1πŸ†1🀩1😎1

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC93 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

πŸ‘3⚑2πŸ”₯2πŸŽ„1πŸŽ‰1πŸ˜‡1πŸ†’1

12 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC74 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

+290 pips πŸ‘ŠπŸ»βœŠπŸ» Manaaaaa trade qanaqa bo’ladi

πŸ”₯2πŸ˜‡2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸŽ„1πŸ†1🀝1😎1

12 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC74 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Sekin sekin yaxshi yo’nalishda +160 pips 🀫😎

⚑2❀‍πŸ”₯2🀩2🍾1🀝1πŸ˜‡1

12 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

+110 pips 🀫🀝

πŸ’―2😍2πŸŽ„1🀝1πŸ†’1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @World_Capital_001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝗧π—₯π—”π——π—˜ π—œπ—‘π—©π—˜π—¦π—§
@Trade_InvestUz Β· 50,923
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here β€” alongside 44 others β€” read 26 August 2026
𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓.𝒖𝒛
@trader_uuz Β· 34,365
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 47 here β€” alongside 46 others β€” read 4 September 2026
XAUUSD | KILLER
@XAUUSD_KILLEER Β· 33,005
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 48 here β€” alongside 47 others β€” read 4 September 2026
𝗛𝗬𝗕π—₯π—œπ—— 𝗧π—₯π—”π——π—˜
@hybrid_scalp Β· 50,210
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 48 here β€” alongside 47 others β€” read 25 August 2026
VOLATILITY INDICES STEP INDEX SIGNALS
@Volatility_Indices_Index_Signals Β· 266,261
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 42 here β€” alongside 41 others β€” read 13 August 2026
R.S.T | INVEST
@RST_invest Β· 31,652
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 54 here β€” alongside 53 others β€” read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œWorld Capital πŸ“Šβ€ (@World_Capital_001), 1,086 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/World_Capital_001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.