2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 259–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 05:21
260
+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:47
259
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.2%
avg views ÷ 260 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
14 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
1,499
Reactions total
93
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
39
41.9%
🎃
19
20.4%
❤🔥
14
15.1%
🤝
7
7.53%
🕊
6
6.45%
☃
4
4.30%
👾
2
2.15%
😢
1
1.08%
🦄
1
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
امروز روز جهانی گربس و زمان مناسبیه که براشون جایزه بگیرید، بیشتر باهاشون بازی کنیم، برای گربه های بیرون یه ظرف آب بذارید.
اما شاید بپرسید چرا روز گربه داریم؟
به نظرم دلیل خاصی نیاز نداره هر روز باید ازشون قدردانی کنیم که موجودات موذی رو شکار میکنن تا ما ازشون بیماری نگیریم، خودشون خودشون رو اهلی کردن تا بتونن کنار ما باشن و فقط برای اینکه ما بیشتر بهشون توجه کنیم میو میکنن؛ بین خودشون صداهای دیگه دارن. ولی دلیل ا…
احساس میکنم توی مغز ما خانمها یه ساعت هست که مدام نزدیک شدن به روز جزا رو گوشزد میکنه.
چند روز بعد از پریود: آخیش... تموم شد. چقدر زندگی قشنگه، چقدر انرژی دارم، چقدر همهچی خوبه، باید بیشتر از زندگی لذت ببرم. بعد کمکم روزها میگذره و ساعت شروع میکنه به تیکتاک کردن.
تا قبل از نیمهی چرخه: هنوز وقت داریم. بیخیال. ولی از نیمه که رد میشیم:
تیک.
اوه اوه یادم باشه بیشتر از زندگی لذت ببرم حسابی ورزش کنم.
تیک.
قرار ن…
کتاب قشنگی بود از اونایی که تو ذهنم میمونه.
این کتاب که با الهام از زندگی مری انینگ و الیزابت فیلیپات نوشته شده، بیشتر از هر چیز من رو به این سؤال برگردوند که چرا تو تاریخ، نام زنان دانشمند و اثرگذار کمتر به چشم میخوره. و خب بهتر بگم که خیلی قشنگ آروم آدم رو به این جواب میرسونه که مشکل کمبود استعداد یا هوش نبود؛ بلکه موانعی بودن که راه رو برای دیده شدن زنان خیلی سختتر میکرد. در دورانی که از زن انتظار میرفت فقط …
🦉 امروز ۴ آگوست روز جهانی جغد بود.
تو افسانهها میگن اگر نیمهشب صدای جغدی رو بشنوی، شاید جنگل میخواد رازی رو بهت زمزمه کنه. جغد قرنهاست که بین دو دنیا زندگی میکنه؛ برای بعضی فرهنگها نشونهی شومی و پیامآور تاریکیه و برای بعضی دیگه، نماد خرد، جادو و دانشی که فقط تو سکوت شب پیدا میشه. شاید به همین دلیله که چشمهای بزرگش همیشه انگاری چیزی رو میبینن که از نگاه ما پنهون مونده. اما پشت تمام این افسانهها، حقیقتی نه…
Xylaria polymorpha
که به انگشتان مرد مرده Dead Man's Fingers معروفه، از اون قارچهاییهست که اگه تو جنگل مهآلود ببینید احتمالاً برای چند ثانیه مغزتون بین قارچ و صحنهی فیلم ترسناک زامبی گیر کنه. از دل تنهها و ریشههای در حال پوسیدن، چندین تودهی سیاه و انگشتمانند که از زیر خاک بیرون زده. وقتی جوونه، نوک انگشتها آبی یا خاکستری کمرنگه، اما با گذشت زمان کاملاً سیاه و زبر میشه شبیه چوب سوخته. جالبه که برعکس ظاهر تر…
من فضولم خیلی یا همهی ادمینهای کانالا اینجورین که گاهی عکس اعضای کانالشون رو میبینن؟ آرههههه من همتونرو دیدممم، برای همین وقتی از کانال لفت میدید از رو عکستون عروسک وودو درست میکنم سوزن سوزن میزنم بهش 😈🧙🏻♀️.
🎃13☃4❤2❤🔥2🕊1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @WitchyInstructions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 719,775 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دفترچه راهنمای جادوگر” (@WitchyInstructions), 260 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WitchyInstructions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.