Channel
@Wisdom_from_twitter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001494355463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wisdom_from_twitter |
| Description | Мудрость из твиттера без лишнего шума, как это работает: https://afinaagency.peerboard.com/post/467492715 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wisdom_from_twitter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 5 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
🐦 @paulg: This may be the most interesting super-specialized account I follow. @bclemens finds planes in satellite photos and figures out what they are. It's a fascinating core sample through history.
🐦 @paulg: When self-driving cars are taken for granted as part of city infrastructure (which is probably only a few more years), the statements of the people trying to ban them will read like someone trying to ban electricity or indoor plumbing.
🐦 @jackbutcher: https://t.co/XdXsIJThtL
🐦 @jackbutcher: https://t.co/46qWxc8Q8K
🐦 @jackbutcher: 5.5% 🫡
🐦 @jackbutcher: 🐧🔒
🐦 @lexfridman: Pain is a good teacher.
🐦 @nntaleb: Some psycholophaster went after my critique of IQ... proving my point that it is a measure of unintelligence, not intelligence. Simply, things that work in the negative domain must not be applied to the positive domain. https://t.co/AGc472ZP4r
🐦 @paulg: Watch as the US economy switches from General Electric, Exxon, AT&T, and Coca-Cola to Apple, Microsoft, Google and Amazon. The trend is so clear and so dramatic. https://t.co/lhe7FaE2cl
🐦 @mkobach: I've got a few "$5 off first @Slice order codes" burning a hole in my pocket. Reply with a 🍕 if you want one. First come, first served.
🐦 @JamesClear: The benefits that arise from a good relationship—whether it be in marriage, friendship, business, or otherwise—are often produced over a long time span. Is it more important to win this battle or to maintain this relationship?
🐦 @mkobach: When rates are suddenly high like this, it benefits people with lots of money because they can either afford the rates or pay in cash. Rates being this high didn’t decrease prices (like most predicted) and won’t, but instead it just widening the gap between those who can afford… https://t.co/0LqR5zdeww
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Wisdom_from_twitter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Wisdom_from_twitter named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wisdom from twitter” (@Wisdom_from_twitter), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wisdom_from_twitter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.