Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✶’ WIND+C | SLOWUP P.M 🇻🇬

@WindChaseer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,654subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425178795
TypeChannel
Username@WindChaseer
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WindChaseer

Growth

7,6517,6547,652.56 August 2026 — 7,651 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,653 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,652 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,654 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,651–7,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:347,654+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:437,652-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:447,653+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:467,651first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

961 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥23824.8%
16016.6%
🆒12813.3%
🔥9710.1%
🤩737.60%
💋575.93%
💘575.93%
🏆484.99%
🍾353.64%
🍓313.23%
😭212.19%
🥰70.728%
🦄50.52%
🎉40.416%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 961reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WindChaseer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 8 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
15.0%
3 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,230
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,900
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2026030510121442351501030016648346750930615 March 20265 March 2026
2026030810121448551501030016688146716253718 March 20268 March 2026
2026040510121475551501030016611227178550515 April 20265 April 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 8 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2026, 09:49 UTC≈7,330 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Next material

  1. Cute47%
  2. Cool62%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2

5 Apr 2026, 09:38 UTC≈8,160 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260405101214755515010300166112271785505

I'm sharing DANA Kaget now! Let's claim it before it's gone 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=s4fj89kv4&r=c9jo4l&orderId=20260405101214755515010300166112271785505

11🔥2

30 Mar 2026, 02:42 UTC≈10,600 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BATTLE──(&.) #EXICT| TALE OF THE “MIDNIGHT GRID.” ⓘ HIGH-RISK, 01: ASCENT. &... PERMISSION 📁 LONDON GIRL (NYC / 02:14 A.M.) district : “LOWER GRID.” the moment breaks loose. who takes it ──街. the LEAD? | RAW STEP, SOLE.HIT.

❤‍🔥5020🍓12🏆10🆒6🍾5💋5🤩5

29 Mar 2026, 01:47 UTC≈11,600 views133 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BATTLE──(&.) #EXICT| TALE OF THE “MIDNIGHT GRID.” ⓘ HIGH-RISK, 01: ASCENT. &... PERMISSION 📁 SKATEBOARD (NYC / 02:14 A.M.) district : “LOWER GRID.” the moment breaks loose. who takes it ──街. the LEAD? | RAW STEP, SOLE.HIT.

❤‍🔥5726🤩9💋8🏆7🆒6🍓5💘5

20 Mar 2026, 01:38 UTC≈8,730 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kami informasikan lagi bahwa material ini kami takedown terlebih dahulu karena terdapat penggunaan PNG dengan lisensi yang belum jelas terkait izin commercial use. Sebagai bentuk tanggung jawab, kami memilih untuk menarik material berikut untuk di takedown https://t.me/WindChaseer/1059 https://t.me/WindChaseer/1038 bagi yang sudah sempat menggunakan atau menyimpan material ini, kami mohon kesediaannya untuk segera

😭212

14 Mar 2026, 01:18 UTC≈10,900 views152 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BATTLE──(&.) #EXICT| TALE OF THE “MIDNIGHT GRID.” ⓘ HIGH-RISK, 01: ASCENT. &... PERMISSION 📁 NYC BOY (NYC / 02:14 A.M.) district : “LOWER GRID.” the moment breaks loose. who takes it ──街. the LEAD? | RAW STEP, SOLE.HIT.

🆒5824🤩20🔥13❤‍🔥10🏆7💋7🍾6

8 Mar 2026, 02:19 UTC≈9,230 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260308101214485515010300166881467162537

Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sgmr6hw2s&r=kDTxCq&orderId=20260308101214485515010300166881467162537 jangan lupa basic manners.

6💋1🔥1

5 Mar 2026, 04:04 UTC≈9,540 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260305101214423515010300166483467509306

Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sd7jzxmqk&r=g3gh7Q&orderId=20260305101214423515010300166483467509306 jangan lupa basic manners cinta.

8

26 Feb 2026, 01:28 UTC≈14,700 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BATTLE──(&.) #EXICT| TALE OF THE “MIDNIGHT GRID.” ⓘ HIGH-RISK, 01: ASCENT. &... PERMISSION 📁 (NYC / 02:14 A.M.) district : “LOWER GRID.” the moment breaks loose. who takes it ──街. the LEAD? | RAW STEP, SOLE.HIT.

🆒4418🍾17❤‍🔥9🏆5🤩5💋4💘4

26 Feb 2026, 01:28 UTC≈10,000 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BATTLE──(&.) #EXICT| TALE OF THE “MIDNIGHT GRID.” ⓘ HIGH-RISK, 01: ASCENT. &... PERMISSION 📁 (NYC / 02:14 A.M.) district : “LOWER GRID.” the moment breaks loose. who takes it ──街. the LEAD? | RAW STEP, SOLE.HIT.

💘26💋13🔥11🍓86❤‍🔥5🍾3🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WindChaseer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Apr 2026, 09:49 UTCFinal Results104 voters

Next material

  1. Cute47%
  2. Cool62%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 8 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,374 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✶’ WIND+C | SLOWUP P.M 🇻🇬” (@WindChaseer), 7,654 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WindChaseer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.