A simple, but beautiful custom found it's way home.
❤🔥6❤2

Channel
@WillowsClaw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
38subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002674071801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WillowsClaw |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WillowsClaw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 38 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 39 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 39 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 59.9% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 12.2% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 9.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 5.44% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.08% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A simple, but beautiful custom found it's way home.
❤🔥6❤2
Maighdean na Tuinne - Mother of pearl, dyed quartz, and Czech glass seed beads, all woven together to create a one of a kind beauty, fit for the loveliest ceasg. DM for price
⚡5😍3
A little something in the works 🥰
❤5❤🔥4😍3
Amphitrite, Greek goddess and personification of the sea, Poseidons beloved, Queen of the ocean, and mother of various deities and creatures of the sea. This larger pair is made of Toho seed beads, glass and metal beads, dentalium shell, and stunning abalone tear drops with red and purple flash (which was so very stubborn to capture)! 💜 (SOLD)
❤8😍3
Vellamo, Finnish goddess of water, lakes, and seas who controls winds, storms, fish, and seafarers! She's made of various blue Toho seed beads, metal beads, glass beads, dentalium shell, and of course abalone with a beautiful blue and green flash! 💙 (SOLD)
❤7⚡3
Cliodhna, Celtic goddess of the sea, the Otherworld, love, passion, and beauty! She's made of various Toto seed beads, dainty dentalium shells, mother of pearl, glass and metal. ❤️ (NFS)
❤7🥰3
The first batch from my ocean themed collection is here! Obviously, a big part of the inspiration for this entire collection is the ocean, however, I wanted to pay tribute to different European Goddesses of the sea, with each piece that I create. So, here they are, in all their beauty and glory! Made of Toho seed beads, abalone, mother of pearl, and dentalium shells, glass beads, and metal beads, they are truly lovel…
❤7😍3
Last custom of the year! Definitely love this one, easily a favorite of mine. The little noodle is just too cute! 🐍🌺🌸
❤6🤩5😍3
And quartz with little stars! 🤩
❤8😍3
Lapis Lazuli with little moons, simple and sweet!
❤9🥰3
Next up on my list, is this little cutie 😍
❤8⚡3
My oldest made this as a gift for a family member, and I just had to share. He wanted to collect all the bugs himself, even if it was just a few legs here and there 😂. He even found some snake skin from our yard, to use. He's such a creative boy, I love how it turned out. 😍
❤6🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @WillowsClaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 882,884 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Willow's Claw” (@WillowsClaw), 38 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WillowsClaw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.