ΡΠ°ΡΡ,Π²Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ²Ρ,ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡ?)π
β€325π77π€·60β€βπ₯30π₯11π€£8β‘6π4
Signed ΡΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡ

Channel
@Wife_Dmitry
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
751subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001755096245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wife_Dmitry |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wife_Dmitry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 751 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 749 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 749 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
1,993 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 1,153 | 57.9% | |
| π | 361 | 18.1% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 143 | 7.18% | |
| π₯ | 88 | 4.42% | |
| π€· | 60 | 3.01% | |
| π | 35 | 1.76% | |
| π₯° | 34 | 1.71% | |
| π€£ | 24 | 1.20% | |
| π | 21 | 1.05% | |
| π¦ | 19 | 0.953% | |
| β‘ | 13 | 0.652% | |
| π | 11 | 0.552% | |
| π | 8 | 0.401% | |
| π | 8 | 0.401% | |
| π³ | 6 | 0.301% | |
| π | 6 | 0.301% | |
| π€― | 3 | 0.151% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,993reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2024 to 10 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ΡΠ°ΡΡ,Π²Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ²Ρ,ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡ?)π
β€325π77π€·60β€βπ₯30π₯11π€£8β‘6π4
Signed ΡΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΠ°ΠΊ Π΄Π°Π²Π½ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π΅ π«£
β€210π¦19π€£16π9π₯9π5β€βπ₯4π4
Signed π
Video message, posted without a caption
β€116π43β€βπ₯23π5π₯4π3π2
Signed π
Video message, posted without a caption
β€219π69π20π₯8π6π4β€βπ₯3
Signed π
Video message, posted without a caption
β€264π91π₯27π9β‘7π³6β€βπ₯4π2
Signed π
ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ @wooow109
π₯°34π₯1
Signed ΡΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎ Ρ ΠΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π§ΡΠΎ ΡΠΎ Π΄Π°Π²Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ ( ΠΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΡ)
β€βπ₯76β€19π₯11π9π3π€―3π2π2
Signed π
ΠΡ , ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ
π₯17π3
Signed π
ΠΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°Π» ΡΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½
π20
Signed π
ΠΡΠ΅Π·ΠΆΠ°Π»Π° Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° ΠΆΠ°Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ 2.5 ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ³Π° Π² ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ.
π29β€βπ₯3
Signed π
ΠΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π²ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°Π΅ΠΌ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ
π5
Signed π
ΡΠ°ΠΊ Π²ΡΡΠ»ΠΎ
Signed π
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Wife_Dmitry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@Wife_Dmitry named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ―πππ πΈππππππβ (@Wife_Dmitry), 751 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wife_Dmitry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.