Channel
@WhiteRoadClub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,119subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001616109238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WhiteRoadClub |
| Created | 16 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WhiteRoadClub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,119 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 2,116 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 2,115 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 2,114 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 2,114 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (9 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,599 |
| Reactions total | 179 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
363 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 194 | 53.4% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 14.9% | |
| 😢 | 24 | 6.61% | |
| 😱 | 24 | 6.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Зову в уникальную экспедицию в Монголию 1-13 сентября. Осталось всего два места. Зачем фотографу в Монголию? За пустыней Гоби, за охотниками-беркутчи. За каньонами. А мы поедем за кадрами, которых почти ни у кого нет - мы отправимся на берега озера Хубсугул, чтобы снимать наездников на оленях цаатаннов! Но уникальной этнографией дело не ограничится - цаатаны живут в живописных местах. Огромное озеро, петлючие речки,…
🔥20👍9❤2
Раз уж я сказал, что в экспедиции потерял дрон, не буду откладывать в долгий ящик и расскажу, как именно это произошло. Я летаю с 2017 года. Сказать, что летаю рискованно - приуменьшить. Я часто летаю далеко, прижимаюсь к скалам, пролетаю через каньоны и возвращаюсь на последних десяти процентах. И, естественно, в своих яхтенных экспедициях я летаю с яхты, причем часто в не самую спокойную погоду. Почему я это делаю…
😢23❤11😱5👍3
Вернулся с Командорских островов. Непростая получилась экспедиция. На отходе море испытывало волнами, которые остались после ушедшего шторма. На обратном пути попали в другой шторм - с волнами с трехэтажный дом. Даже опытный капитан, аккуратно подбирая слова, высказался на тему: "Видел разные шторма. Этот... кхм... меня удивил". В качестве платы за проход море забрало у меня новый Mavic 4. Но дало гораздо больше. Сол…
🔥54👍17❤15😱1
Давно у нас тут этого мема не было... Можете делать ставки, что случилось
😱18😢1
Завтра я снова сяду в маленькую пластиковую скорлупку и уйду туда, где встает солнце. В конце пути длиной двое суток - Командорские острова. Дальше только океан и где-то совсем уж далеко Америка. С Командорами у меня особая история. Я задумал попасть туда еще сидя на яхте в своей первой курильской экспедиции. Но потом то погода разворачивала нас с Командор на Курилы, то группа не набиралась. А причиной всему - то, ч…
🔥34👍8❤7
Шелковый путь Я уже рассказывал про дремлющих драконов ущелья Таш-Рабат. Но вот про сам караван-сарай, ради которого сюда едут туристы, не рассказывал. А, как оказалось, зря. Само сооружение - один из немногих архитектурных памятников Кыргызстана. И один из важнейших для всего региона и ветви Шелкового пути, который проходил через этот регион. Я никогда не предавал особого значения истории Таш-Рабата, но после кучи…
🔥21👍14❤2
Давайте, пока тема конкурсов свежая, я вам покажу пару фотографий, которые считаю конкурсными. Первая снята в дождливое утро в Хуаншане, Китай. Совершенно не такие фотографии обычно оттуда привозят, но мне этот сюжет безумно нравится. Кажется, именно такие сюжеты относят к категории "интимного пейзажа". Вторая - очень неожиданный сюжет из последней поездки по Кыргызстану. Река, впадающая в небо. И снова не то, что "п…
🔥23❤12👍9
Продолжаю штурмовать международные конкурсы (читай "бессмысленно тратить деньги"). Сегодня загрузил фотографии на Epson Pano Award. Требования конкурса - все работы должны быть с соотношением сторон 1:2 или длиннее, так что все многорядные панорамы с дрона, которых у меня вагон - мимо. При этом можно даже отрезать обычные кадры до панорамных. Сомнительно, но окэй. Загрузил 10 кадров, что уже не дешевое удовольствие -…
🔥42👍7❤5
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @WhiteRoadClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,952 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WhiteRoad Club” (@WhiteRoadClub), 2,119 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhiteRoadClub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.