Channel
@WhiteLedger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002360315262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WhiteLedger |
| Description | Ведем бух учет для малого и среднего бизнеса под ключ. Пишем про оптимизацию, экономию и разъяснение законов. Для связи пишите @PTNbuh |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WhiteLedger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 74 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 37.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 25.7% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 18.3% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 7.34% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔔НАПОМИНАЛКА ДО 25.02.2026 сдаем отчетность 📌 уведомление о сумме НДФЛ (1–22 февраля) 📌 уведомление о страховых взносах за январь 📌 6-НДФЛ за 2025 📌 персонифицированные сведения за январь 📌 декларация или уведомление по налогу на имущество — зависит от способа расчёта 📌 уведомления по транспортному и земельному налогам за 2025 год 📌 декларация по налогу на прибыль за январь (для тех, кто платит авансы по факту) 📌 …
👍4
20 карт в одни руки💳💳💳 На рассмотрении очередной проект ФЗ о внесении изменений... Что нас может ждать: 📌1 человек - не более 20 карт. Общий лимит на все банки. 📌Один банк сможет предоставить клиенту-физлицу не более 5 карт. 📌Информацию о выданных картах будут передовать в новую базу данных – Единую систему учета платежных карт. ЦБ РФ сможет установить иные лимиты. P.S. Не думаю, что у многих есть потребность в 20…
👍4🔥2
На этой неделе постов не было…. но хорошее настроение никто не отменял)) Какая деятельность, такой и юмор🤣🤣
😁4❤2🤣2🔥1
#РасслабляйсяОсторожноПятница
😁3🤣2😭2
ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕН=ГОТОВ Как узнать о предстоящей проверке? Сайт ФГИС «Единый реестр контрольных (надзорных) мероприятий» Как проверить: 1️⃣Перейдите на сайт: Зайдите на официальный сайт . 2️⃣Используйте поиск: введите ИНН, ОГРН или наименование своей организации. 3️⃣Введите код: для подтверждения, что вы не робот 4️⃣система покажет, есть ли ваша организация в планах проверок или есть ли информация о проведенных мероприя…
👍3🙏3❤1
🔔 НАПОМИНАЛКА До 28.01.26 необходимо оплатить 🪙 ▪️Страховые взносы за декабрь 2025 ▪️НДФЛ, удержанный с 1 по 22 января ▪️НДС - 1-й платеж за 4 кв. ▪️Туристический налог за 4 кв. Нужна помощь, пишите @PTNbuh
👍2🔥2
Легкий контен на выходные. О жизни, бизнесе, деньгах. Все как мы любим. К просмотру рекомендую ( ⬅️ссылка тут)
🔥10
#РасслабляйсяОсторожноПятница
🤣4😁3
26.01.26 красивая дата и последний день сдачи отчетности! Что сдаем: 📎 РСВ за 2025 г. 📎 Раздел 2 ЕФС-1 (Подраздел 1.2, Раздел 2) за 2025 г. 📎 Декларация по НДС за 4 кв. 📎 Декларация по туристическому налогу за 4 кв. 📎 Уведомление об НДФЛ, удержанном с 1 по 22 января Нужна помощь, пишите @PTNbuh
👍3🙏2
ОТЗЫВ – хорошо или плохо? Отзывы на Яндексе привели к доначислениям Наглядный пример, того, как налоговая все видит (если хочет). ИП, сфера деятельности – бьюти. Наемных сотрудников – нет. Выручка – есть. Ключевым показателем для ИФНС стали отзывы на «Яндекс картах». Как итог: 📍трудоустроены сотрудники с 2024г. 📍доплачены налоги и взносы 📍сдана отчетность ИП маленький и никому не интересен – давно уже МИФ. Не ж…
👍3🔥1
В работе бухгалтера, как в ресторане, есть все, кроме скуки)))) САМОЗАНЯТЫЕ Работодатель в зоне риска С 6 января 2025 года уточнен перечень индикаторов риска для проверок ГИТ (государственная инспекция труда) В список показателей, которые используют при решении вопроса о проведении внеплановой проверки работодателя и выборе ее вида, добавили сотрудничество с самозанятыми. Критерий станут использовать, если: 1️⃣ра…
👍3🔥2
ИСКУССТВО СТАТИСТИКИ ЗАКЛЮЧАЕТСЯ В ПРАВИЛЬНОМ СЛОЖЕНИИ НЕПРАВИЛЬНЫХ ЧИСЛЕ Не забываем сдавать отчетность в Росстат. Отчетность простая, штрафы большие. Проверить какую форму отчетности сдавать и когда, можно на сайте Росстатсайте Росстат, нужен только ИНН. Штрафы за непредоставление отчётности в Росстат ИП от 10 000 до 20 000 ₽ — за первичное нарушение от 30 000 до 50 000 ₽ — за повторное ООО от 20 000 до 70 000…
👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WhiteLedger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 900,039 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“White Ledger & Co” (@WhiteLedger), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhiteLedger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.