Channel
@WendysMemes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,350subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001655175829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WendysMemes |
| Created | 9 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WendysMemes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,350 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,351 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 1,353 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 1,352 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 June 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 942 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
300 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 97 | 32.3% | |
| 😁 | 66 | 22.0% | |
| 🍌 | 54 | 18.0% | |
| 🙉 | 39 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5850343127621046732 | 20 | 6.67% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 5.33% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.67% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is the final judgement handed down in the case of the Jacobs out of Douglas County Georgia. They had their case thrown out by the judge after a long and stressful fight over distributing flyers legally. The arrest was clearly an act of intimidation, as the state of Georgia has a long standing precedent for distributing political information the way that they did.
⚡11
They’re appealing so that’s great. But, hogwash that Shiloh and her family will have to deal with this burden. Her penalty is nothing, but a hindrance and waste of precious time as a mother
🍌2💯1custom 58503431276210467321
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡9🍌1custom 58503431276210467321
Lmao got em
custom 58503431276210467326⚡1❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤6⚡3🍌2😁1🙉1
"Millions of foreigners are burrowing deep into the institutions of our home. We will root them all out one by one and piece by piece but we will need to be better, more organized, more disciplined, more united. Do WE wish to hold this land for our descendants MORE than THEY wish to take it for theirs? Prove it to me that you do. " Thomas Rousseau http://patriotfront.us/join
⚡4🍌3❤2🙉2custom 58503431276210467322
https://rumble.com/v7cb6sy-i-day-250-irl-full-stream.html
custom 58503431276210467323⚡2🍌2🙉2
LMFAO shut the FUCK up right now 🤣😂🤣😂
😁16🍌2🙉1
I HIGHLY encourage you all to listen to Thomas's speech in its entirety
⚡9🍌2🙉2😁1
@PatriotFrontNews » 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 Watch the speech from Patriot Front's recent march through Washington, DC in recognition of America's 250th Independence Day. Thomas Rousseau speaks to PF's supporters, detractors and the nation at large in an address given in front of Union Station. ⭐️ Submit your application today: patriotfront.us/join
⚡11🙉2❤1🍌1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁17🍌4🙉4
@PatriotFrontSightings » Patriot Front live in DC for America 250
⚡14❤4🍌3🙉3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WendysMemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“POCKET MEMES” (@WendysMemes), 1,350 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WendysMemes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.