Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 有故事的女同学

Channel

有故事的女同学

@WenAnGuan_botjihuo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,022subscribers

-583 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275806250
TypeChannel
Username@WenAnGuan_botjihuo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WenAnGuan_botjihuo

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,0229,6079,314.57 August 2026 — 9,605 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,585 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,566 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,550 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,536 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,514 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,509 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,486 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,478 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,458 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,411 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,386 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,350 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,292 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,238 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,189 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,173 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,152 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,130 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,112 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,095 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,075 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,054 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,037 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,022 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net -583. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,934–9,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 23:409,022-15
5 Nov 2026, 15:519,037-17
2 Nov 2026, 21:499,054-21
30 Oct 2026, 16:469,075-20
27 Oct 2026, 13:299,095-17
24 Oct 2026, 09:209,112-18
21 Oct 2026, 05:579,130-22
17 Oct 2026, 19:069,152-21
15 Oct 2026, 00:479,173-16
11 Oct 2026, 19:219,189-49
5 Oct 2026, 14:019,238-54
28 Sept 2026, 01:399,292-58
18 Sept 2026, 16:189,350-36
14 Sept 2026, 05:579,386-25
10 Sept 2026, 14:199,411-47
5 Sept 2026, 11:209,458-20
1 Sept 2026, 17:149,478-8
30 Aug 2026, 02:249,486-23
27 Aug 2026, 03:389,509-5
23 Aug 2026, 23:359,514first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 9,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held21 (3 January 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total1,010
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 23:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7368.2%
👍3129.0%
👏10.935%
🔥10.935%
🤯10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

经历越多越明白, 能治愈你的 从来不是时间! 而是心理的释怀!

10 Jun 2026, 20:57 UTC≈17,600 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

这是你最后一次带队远航,无论如何,请再一次跳动那颗不服输的心脏,祝你好运! #2026美加墨世界杯 #葡萄牙队 #诸神黄昏 #永远的c罗 #C罗最后一舞

❤10👍4🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC≈18,900 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

怕输才会紧张 想赢只会兴奋

👍5❤2

4 May 2026, 01:45 UTC≈20,900 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

想不通的时候 多给自己一点时间 过两天你就想不起来了

❤8👍2

27 Apr 2026, 05:02 UTC≈20,900 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

财能改命, 势能压人,有钱能买通天路,没钱难遇知心人。

👍11❤4

21 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC≈17,900 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

人都得为自己犯过的错误而买单,无一例外,或早或晚。

❤6

23 Feb 2026, 14:57 UTC≈21,100 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

“光着脚从家里走出的那一刻,就没想过光着脚回去,我很明白,捞偏门就相当于跟鬼借钱,该还的时候跑不掉,但我还是一意孤行。”

❤4🤯1

17 Feb 2026, 18:44 UTC≈19,300 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

“浪子回头金不换,衣锦还乡做柴火鸡!”

❤9

16 Feb 2026, 21:46 UTC≈15,800 viewsread 8 November 2026

新年快乐,兄弟姐妹们,希望今年大家都更上一层楼!

16 Feb 2026, 21:46 UTC≈15,500 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

你说你是天才 这里面哪个不是人中龙凤

👍3

9 Feb 2026, 11:12 UTC≈15,300 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

国内是看不到希望了,去东南亚闯一闯,行囊收好,焦虑暂存,东南亚的风里,藏着有没试过的人生,除了生死都是擦伤,顶峰相见!#越南 #胡志明

❤6

9 Feb 2026, 11:12 UTC≈11,800 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

😢😭😤😠😡🤬 正式开启 🏮 🏮 金马送福 · 恭贺新春 🏮 🏮 七大新春福利上线|全员可领|直接开冲 🤩 😀 官方入口: 6G.COM 😅【开年豪礼 · 存款送三次 100%】 📣 新春最狠福利 💵 存多少 · 送多少 ⛪️ 1000 存 → 2000 到账,真翻倍! 🔡【新春红包 · 鸿运开场】🔡 💥 每日 12 波红包雨 💕 单个最高 88888 USDT 🔥 拼手气 · 拼速度 · 现在就 🎉 【开年狂欢 · 人人有礼】 🎉 😩 新老用户 同享福利 ✅ 充值即可领 USDT 彩金 🥹 2066 + 1066 万 USDT|新春瓜分 🔥 新年第一波,错过再等一年! 其他福利速览: 👑 回归双礼|🐟 邀请有奖|💎 直属分红|🧐 充值回馈 ✅😀😀😀 巨额福利已就位,6G全球与您欢度新春! 🔗 立即进入| 6G.COM 👍👎👊✊🤞✌️🫰🤟 😀 彩票入口: 6G.COM 🥷 飞投:@AA6G 🔯 客服

❤4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @WenAnGuan_botjihuo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

吃瓜中心|热点曝光
@chigua6680 · 235,217
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“有故事的女同学” (@WenAnGuan_botjihuo), 9,022 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WenAnGuan_botjihuo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.