Channel
@WelfAnnouncement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60,085subscribers
-248 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002103627889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WelfAnnouncement |
| Description | Official Welf Announcements Channel. Link to our TG Chat: https://t.me/WelfChat |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WelfAnnouncement |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 60,085 | -26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 60,111 | -63 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 60,174 | -40 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 60,214 | -35 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 60,249 | -39 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 60,288 | -45 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 60,333 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,622 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 98.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Private markets are moving on-chain. Not in one migration. Fund by fund, jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Every step raises the same questions: who holds the asset, under which law, with what recourse. Investors whose structures already answer them will move first when the opportunity arrives. Join the discussion on X. Read and share, link: Welf Finance (@WelfFinance) on X
❤7👏1
Private credit, real estate, fund interests, instruments that once traded by appointment are becoming transferable. Liquidity is an opportunity and a temptation in equal measure. The investors who benefit will be the ones with a framework for when not to sell. → welf.com. X post to like and share: https://x.com/welffinance/status/2083171973417271652?s=46&t=nY9SaseZoSzzL4HnAF7Fpw
❤4👏1
A tokenized bond is still a bond. A tokenized fund is still a fund. What changes is settlement, transferability, and access, and those changes reshape how portfolios are built and moved. New rails, same obligations: suitability, custody, structure. That's where advice earns its place. X post: https://x.com/welffinance/status/2081732144129274286?s=46&t=nY9SaseZoSzzL4HnAF7Fpw → welf.com. For professional clients onl…
❤8
Most portfolios aren't as diversified as they look. When every return engine responds to the same underlying forces, spreading across asset classes only creates the appearance of protection. The crises of 2008, 2020, and 2022 proved it. True resilience comes from a different kind of independence entirely. The full breakdown is in the article: The Correlation Crisis: When Diversification Fails X: https://x.com/welf…
❤4
The smarter the investor, the more convincing the story they can tell themselves. High-net-worth individuals have access to better data, sharper frameworks, and more sophisticated language; which means the rationalisations tend to be more elaborate, not less frequent. That's the part behavioural finance rarely talks about. Read the full piece: The Real Reason Why Investors Underperform the Market, And What to Do Abo…
❤6
Behavioural finance has been mainstream for years. Every sophisticated investor knows the biases. Most still fall for them, not out of ignorance, but because knowledge and resistance operate on entirely different pathways. The real edge today isn't informational. It's structural. Read the full breakdown here: The Real Reason Why Investors Underperform the Market, And What to Do About It X: https://x.com/welffinanc…
❤5
Welf Takes the Stage at the RWA Week Panel! Tokenization is scaling faster than the frameworks built to govern it. Which raises the real question: who ends up in control, the platforms issuing the assets, the protocols settling them, or the governments regulating both? That's the question on the table at RWA Week, where our Head of Digital Investments, Martijn Pullen, joins the panel "Who Owns the Tokenized Economy…
❤8
Wealth migration in 2026 isn't driven by a single decision. It's the cumulative weight of tax reform, succession risk, geopolitical shifts, and the desire to build something that lasts beyond one generation. The families acting now are thinking ahead. Swipe through to understand what's driving the movement, and why the UAE continues to attract some of the world's most sophisticated wealth. Tweet: https://x.com/Welf…
❤4
Maintenance Complete The scheduled maintenance on the WELF dApp has now been completed successfully. The platform is fully operational again, and all services have been restored.
❤6
The figure most people quote is the tax rate. The figure that matters is $740bn (1/source) of family-office capital choosing the UAE, and the reasons run deeper than zero income tax. Regulatory architecture decides whether structures hold. Succession law decides whether wealth passes the way you intend. Lifestyle decides whether the family actually settles. Tax is the headline; the other three are what make the dec…
❤4
Maintenance Notice We are currently conducting a maintenance update on the WELF dApp. During this maintenance window, the platform will be temporarily unavailable. We are working to complete the update as quickly as possible and will restore full access once the maintenance has been completed. We appreciate your patience and thank you for your continued trust and support.
❤9
Most portfolios aren't as diversified as they look. When every return engine responds to the same underlying forces, spreading across asset classes only creates the appearance of protection. The crises of 2008, 2020, and 2022 proved it. True resilience comes from a different kind of independence entirely. The full breakdown is in the article: https://insights.welf.com/the-correlation-crisis Tweet: https://x.com/We…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WelfAnnouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Welf | Announcements Channel” (@WelfAnnouncement), 60,085 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WelfAnnouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.