Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rico's Thoughts

Channel

Rico's Thoughts

@WeirdMachines

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001142665124
TypeChannel
Username@WeirdMachines
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WeirdMachines

Growth

380381380.57 August 2026 — 380 subscribers7 August 2026 — 380 subscribers14 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 380–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:25381+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:40380no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:47380first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 27 February 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

377 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13535.8%
12934.2%
🔥3910.3%
👎349.02%
🎉174.51%
🤓102.65%
😱82.12%
😁30.796%
🤯20.531%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2021 to 20 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WeirdMachines. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 February 2021 to 20 July 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2024, 07:59 UTC≈6,530 views99 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Last week, I attended the Deutsche Hacking Meisterschaft (German Hacking Championship) in Bonn. I did not participate though - It's an annual CTF event to promote young talent in IT security. The winners will go on to compete in the European Cybersecurity Challenge (taking place in Turin, Italy, this year). This was our second year participating. And just like last year, we prepared a challenge for the contestants t

51👍23🔥14🤓9🎉2

26 Feb 2024, 10:00 UTC≈5,650 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Recently, while working on a project, I ran into an interesting problem. I wanted to scan a data stream (a large file) using regex and extract the matches. The project is written in the Go programming language. Go already has some great functions for working with regex and streams each. Unfortunately, none of them can extract the regex matches from a data stream. The naive approach would be to simply load the file co

🔥2112👍8🤓1😱1

21 Jun 2023, 14:01 UTC≈5,820 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I really love finding amazing new software and cool projects, especially when they help me solve specific problems in the digital world. But I also find it extremely hard to find said software in the vastness of the internet. There's a lot of great projects listed on so called "Awesome"-lists on GitHub, but even they are sometimes lacking true gems. In the first half of 2023 I started @ByteCrawl, a small channel ded

👍187🔥4🤯2😱2

27 Dec 2022, 11:52 UTC≈5,760 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

certstream-server-go Some time ago I created a clone of calidogsec's certstream server, written in Go (#golang). With it you can monitor the certificate transparency network for newly issued TLS certificates. It's fully compatible with the official certstream server, meaning you can use the same clients with either of both tools as server software. You can find the project on my GitHub account: certstream-server-go

👍275👎4😱4😁3

21 Jun 2022, 17:33 UTC≈5,190 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GitHub Copilot is becoming available for everyone for 10$ per month or 100$ per year. I used it for about one year now and I can say that it's insanely good. In about >70% of cases it does exactly what I want to do, most of the time it does it even better than I wanted the code to be. In the other ~30% of cases it at least gives some good hints or suggestions. And what speaks for itself: I immediately noticed when t

👍16🎉112

19 Mar 2022, 19:13 UTC≈4,180 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It's horrible what's happening in Ukraine at the moment. I got no words for this cruel war. And even though the situation leaves us feeling powerless, there are several things we can do to support these affected the most - civilians. Humble Bundle currently sells a bundle with over 120 individual pieces worth more than 2500$. I already own most of these games, so buying it for me wouldn't make any sense. So I thoug

👍27👎11🎉43

15 Feb 2022, 19:32 UTC≈3,360 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Raytracing on a Graphing Calculator - because, you know, why not? :D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY413t5fArw

👍85👎3

9 Dec 2021, 15:39 UTC≈3,230 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Yesterday one of my favorite YouTubers "LEMMiNO" shared a video made by another creator on his twitter account. Attached was a suggestion to watch it - so I did. And boi, I was not disappointed. LIFE BEYOND 3 by melodysheep - an absolutely stunning and visually impressive video about the search of extraterrestrial life. The quality of this thing is so ridiculously great, that I don't know why it's free to watch on Y

5👍2👎2

18 Nov 2021, 13:05 UTC≈2,480 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Interesting: IETF created a draft on the 8th of November to reduce the reserved private IPv4 address range from 127.0.0.0/8 to only 127.0.0.0/16, meaning that the range ends at 127.0.255.255. That could mean that at some point in the future there could be public IPv4 addresses in the range between 127.1.0.0 - 127.255.255.255 - that's another 16 million addresses. As said before, currently this is only a draft and he

5👎2

1 Jul 2021, 16:27 UTC≈2,600 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

5👎2

1 Jul 2021, 16:27 UTC≈2,610 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

5👎2

1 Jul 2021, 16:27 UTC≈2,890 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GitHub is working on a new thingy (e.g. VS Code extension) called "Copilot" and omg this looks amazing. I always dreamed of just telling a computer in natural language what to do and it does exactly that. Well with copilot you get suggestions for lines or even whole functions - based on the comment or name you give a function. Check out their examples - that's insane (assuming it works the way it should). It also mi

6👍4👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @WeirdMachines. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,037,856 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rico's Thoughts” (@WeirdMachines), 381 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeirdMachines.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.